THE CHALLENGE HUB, CHALLENGE COMPLETE

  • Thread starter bjl23
  • 10,084 comments
  • 663,583 views
BATTLE # 2
BTR - Tune by @praiano63
20180804_085152.jpg


205 - Tune by @praiano63 but power parts added to bring it up to 500PP
20180803_180824.jpg
 
unnamed (1).gif

BATTLE#2 RESULTS
@lfm58VS @Lilium

Peugeot 205 Turbo 16 '85
4 POINTS, F/T - 2:39.800 / @lfm58
RUF BTR '86
0 POINTS, F/T - 2:43.629 / @RMan72 - @lfm58

lfm58 with the win

HOWS THE SAME TIMES IN THE RUF FROM @lfm58 and @RMan72!
I'll be back in a couple of hours to kick off the next BATTLE.

---------------

Adobe_20180618_121059.jpg


NO-TUNE CHALLENGE
ROUND 7


@fordlaser - 6:26.101
@RMan72 - 6:27.372
@smoothbore12 - 6:29.241
@bjl23 - 6:32.481
@Racin510s - 6:39.595
@skeagracing - 6:40.736
@Slim_14113 - 7:11.767

SUPER STOCK CHALLENGE

@fordlaser - 6:35.755
@bjl23 - 6:37.235
@smoothbore12 - 6:37.606
@RMan72 - 6:37.699
@Racin510s - 6:38.521

---------------

GONE IN 60 SECONDS
UPDATE

@lfm58: 38 cars
@Racin510s: 22 cars
@bjl23: 19 cars
@smoothbore12: 12 cars

-----------------
 
View attachment 757009
BATTLE#2 RESULTS
@lfm58VS @Lilium

Peugeot 205 Turbo 16 '85
4 POINTS, F/T - 2:39.800 / @lfm58
RUF BTR '86
0 POINTS, F/T - 2:43.629 / @RMan72 - @lfm58

lfm58 with the win

HOWS THE SAME TIMES IN THE RUF FROM @lfm58 and @RMan72!
I'll be back in a couple of hours to kick off the next BATTLE.

---------------

View attachment 757011

NO-TUNE CHALLENGE
ROUND 7


@fordlaser - 6:26.101
@RMan72 - 6:27.372
@smoothbore12 - 6:29.241
@bjl23 - 6:32.481
@Racin510s - 6:39.595
@skeagracing - 6:40.736
@Slim_14113 - 7:11.767

SUPER STOCK CHALLENGE

@fordlaser - 6:35.755
@bjl23 - 6:37.235
@smoothbore12 - 6:37.606
@RMan72 - 6:37.699
@Racin510s - 6:38.521

---------------

GONE IN 60 SECONDS
UPDATE

@lfm58: 38 cars
@Racin510s: 22 cars
@bjl23: 19 cars
@smoothbore12: 12 cars

-----------------
The identical times in the RUF from @lfm58 & @RMan72 reminds me of the times post qualifying for the last race of the 1997 F1 World Drivers Championship at Jerez.

Michael Schumacher, Jacques Villeneuve & Heinz-Harald Frentzen all set an identical time down to the thousandth of a second.
:eek: Unbelievable
 
BATTLE#3

This BATTLE sees 2 very different cars 1 being the Toyota FT-1 which can't be tuned and the Mercedes 230 SLK Kompressor '98 which can be tuned, when I first saw these cars I thought the Toyota on paper looks better but can the tuning of the Mercedes get it over the line?

Check post#4 for more.

ALSO I PUT UP A POLL FOR YOUR FEEDBACK
 
Sniper , you run on 34s and 35s with the " pig " ?

I did one TT yesterday and i was on 36s mid and high.

As Boogeyman said , wheelers have a good chance on this one .
 
BATTLE #3 (entry records)

BATTLE#3 CITYTRMDR S550SH MBSLK230K98 S529SH P1 300878 20180806_154702.jpg
BATTLE#3 CITYTRMDR S550SH TOYOTAFT-1 S550SH P1 256623 20180806_131503.jpg


Entry records after 5 races for each carmodel.
FT-1 much easier to drive than SLK, gap around 2sec per lap.
A bit of ballast for FT-1: 12kg @ 50%.
SLK maxed tuned with @ERAZER style, std trans @ 250km/h, no NOS.

Ciao
 
BATTLE#3

This BATTLE sees 2 very different cars 1 being the Toyota FT-1 which can't be tuned and the Mercedes 230 SLK Kompressor '98 which can be tuned, when I first saw these cars I thought the Toyota on paper looks better but can the tuning of the Mercedes get it over the line?

Check post#4 for more.

ALSO I PUT UP A POLL FOR YOUR FEEDBACK
Bryce, love the poll. 👍:tup:1 week was my choice. There are some here that have to work and don't have the time to put in the time to run these races everyday all day long if they choose to. I hope 1 week wins. I personally think limiting the time availalable to each event is a good thing.💡 I personally do my best under pressure or my first run is usually my best time. I proved to myself on this event. I did have slower times with TC1. Just have yo learn not to get on the gas with the wheel turned.:lol:
The Benz is at very good car.
 
Last edited:
First venture to TC0.:nervous: I tried also ABS0 and ended upsidedown:lol:. But Here is my fiorst times for Battle 3. Inknow I can do better as I have run a 1:32 on lap one. TC0 does make a big difference in how fast the cars are. I didn't think I could control them but to my surprise it wasn't as difficult as I thought. I'm going to improve theses times, just have to sort of change my driving style a little. I tried ABS0 but not ready for that. !!! I had forgotten how well and fast the FT-1 is. It could be the fastest between the 2 for this round. I'll be back with better times.
 

Attachments

  • FT1 Battle 3.jpg
    FT1 Battle 3.jpg
    96.1 KB · Views: 17
  • SLK230 Battle 3.jpg
    SLK230 Battle 3.jpg
    100 KB · Views: 13
Having just a short go in the battle i have to say :

How the 🤬 Gladiator is so fast with that merc ?


The same applies and for Marshmalow man .

This car need twice the the time to brake and i think is a bit of an " unfair " choise to the FT 1.

Anyway @bjl23 give us another headache. :banghead:
 
Welcome VBR to the hub. Glad you are here. This is quite fun and @bjl23 keeps it lively with new challenges. Join in the fun.

Thanks for the invite, but I'm only interested in online racing.


:)
 
VBR
Thanks for the invite, but I'm only interested in online racing.


:)
We do race and we are online :sly:
Just think the AI is us :lol:.

----------

I was just thinking to about capping the cars we pick for the BATTLES to $500,000 is everyone OK with that?
For some events this may have to be lifted.
 
Last edited:
Ok ,ok its a car ........ pigs turn better when they been chashed by the dogs in hunting and also they don t have TC and ABS or the ability to change tyres
And they don t slide at all :lol:
 
OK ladies and gentlemen, I've tested all I can on the ONE HIT WONDERS with the help of all of you. (expect for @Lilium, his not responding) anyway the show must go on. Here are the results from the tests with some very interesting results.

maz.JPG
slower 20180805_074429.jpg
IMG_20180805_081404.jpg
20180807_202426.jpg
20180805_072456.jpg
Mas Tskba.jpg
IMAG0539.jpg

For some reason @fordlaser 'S time didn't want to load, 5:18.107.

No surprises that @RMan72 being the fastest, I'm super impressed with @Racin510s time.
And we had some really close times to

I'm still finalizing some rules but I should have the first round up soon.
 

Attachments

  • My Great Capture Screenshot 2018-08-04 11-09-37.png
    238.5 KB · Views: 16
Back