- 1,194
- New York
- XSVterror16
- xsvterror16
In actual news, the Frnech Prime Minister still needs to sign off on the return of the French Grand Prix, but the organisers are so confident of it that the race has been given a provisional date of September 1st, 2013. If and when Fillon approves of the deal, it will pave the way for the French and Belgian Grands Prix to alternate between Paul Ricard and Spa from 2013.
haitch40We are going to miss spa some years.
Not much of a deal, is it?
Not any time soon. Spa, Suzuka and Singapore are all up for renegotiation this year, and there may be one or two that need to talk in 2013, but most of the calendar is farily well set until 2014-ish. However, Barcelona have said they're looking at their race with a critical eye while Valencia have openly said they want a new deal. So it's possible that they could start alternating, which would open up another calendar berth.Yeah, it could be worse. With all these circuits, is it likely for more deals like this to be made?
The alternative would probably be to have Spa every year for two or three years ... and then vanish altogether.
It could, but the organisers of the Belgian Grand Prix no doubt feel that the race has a better chance of staying on the calendar for longer if they alternate with France and Paul Ricard. Maybe one day they will be able to return to having a race on a yearly basis, but if they continue to have that race on a yearly basis, then it will ultimately collapse. On the other hand, if they alternate with Paul Ricard, they can ride out the problems of the European economy and get to that point where an annual race is viable once more without falling to pieces beforehand.Could still happen anyway.
It could, but the organisers of the Belgian Grand Prix no doubt feel that the race has a better chance of staying on the calendar for longer if they alternate with France and Paul Ricard. Maybe one day they will be able to return to having a race on a yearly basis, but if they continue to have that race on a yearly basis, then it will ultimately collapse. On the other hand, if they alternate with Paul Ricard, they can ride out the problems of the European economy and get to that point where an annual race is viable once more without falling to pieces beforehand.
Or do you think the organisers are doing this because they enjoy screwing the fans?
RTSolvalouI love Webber's approach with his thoughts on alternating Spa with the Paul Ricard circuit:
http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/leave-spa-alone-say-formula-one-figures/?v=2&s=1&i=17
Can you really not have Spa each year though? If it has to be that way then fine, But I hate to lose a special circuit even if we gain a not-so-good one, or should I say one that needs to re-prove it's worthiness.
But I hate to lose a special circuit
The French are meeting Bernie today to submit their proposal for reviving the French Grand Prix, alternating with Beligum from 2013.
Couldn't they have picked a more boring track to alternate with? (Like Valencia or something?) Spa is such a great track I couldn't image having to wait two years for the next Belgian GP!
*facepalm* Why don't people understand this? Spa being Spa does not guarantee it a place on the calendar.Couldn't they have picked a more boring track to alternate with? (Like Valencia or something?) Spa is such a great track I couldn't image having to wait two years for the next Belgian GP!
Couldn't they have picked a more boring track to alternate with? (Like Valencia or something?) Spa is such a great track I couldn't image having to wait two years for the next Belgian GP!
No, because that's not an option. No former race has expressed interest in a return, and Imola is not ready for Formula 1. Likewise, they haven't said anything about a return.Could we not re-introduce a former race and rotate Spa with Imola?
Could we not re-introduce a former race and rotate Spa with Imola?
The French Grand Prix was previously held at Paul Ricard, so technically, they are re-introducing a former race to alternate with Spa.