Carlos
Premium
- 6,453
- Netherlands
Yeah, probably. They shake turbulence.
Anyways, I just got back home on a flight from PIT-ATL and noticed the guy who came and sat beside me was looking at the KC-46 on the airliners forums, I stuck up a conversation with him and found out he flies KC-10's. I mentioned to him as you said it has the 400's glass cockpit and he thought it was the 787's cockpit they were putting in it.
Such a strange aircraft this one...
We also cloud surfed while coming into Atlanta and I have a picture or so of it. A bit of a wing effect (whatever it's called when condensation builds up because of high pressure...) on one of them.
I said both hehe
differing by combining the -200ER fuselage, -300F wing, gear, cargo and floor, -400ER digital flightdeck and flaps, uprated engines, and six generation fly-by-wire fuel delivery boom. However in 2008 the DoD chose the KC-30 over the KC-767. This led Boeing to protest and started a campaign. The Air Force was forced to reopen the tanker contract. In late 2008 the Defence Department canceled the whole thing. The new round was in late 2009, the Air Force announced the selection of KC-767 in February 2011. It was now called the KC-767 NewGen Tanker, based on the 767-200 with an improved version of the KC-10 refueling boom and cockpit displays from the 787
Cool you met that pilot, he's probably more than interested in it! I wouldn't mind going from a KC-10 to 767. I'll miss that third engine though, it still looks great.
Show us the photo 👍 I think the fancy name of what you mean is wingtip vortices. I just learnt that from Wiki