- 4,601
- Ste.Anne, MB
- Perswante
A review on the show (Fruits Basket), and the box set. Of course, the content review and review on the actual product would be separate sections.Are you doing a review on the content in the package of goods? We can do a different review specifically for Merchandise. It can range from lovely DVD/BR box specials, figurines (including gundams) and whatever else that has some value worth sharing.. just no TV shows, films or OVAs.
Also, I think a 0-10 scoring system is a bit too broad of a range... especially for some people in here who's scores tend to be skewed towards the higher end of the spectrum.
I already sense that there's going to be issues of disagreeing with reviews, as some of us tend to be more critical towards things than others....
It goes like this these days. Singles are practically gone. An example of what FUNimation does.Anime typically gets multiple releases (either a normal and special edition, or released in singles then later as a box set)
A review on the show (Fruits Basket), and the box set. Of course, the content review and review on the actual product would be separate sections.
It's basically kinda like what Chris Beveridge does at The Fandom Post. Here's an example. Since that site is down, here's a Mania review (From the site he came from.).
http://www.mania.com/garei-zero-com...mbo-also-wlimited-edition_article_129660.html
That you'll have to take with a grain of salt. Reviews are always opinions, don't forget. If you don't dig a certain person's tastes, well, either don't take their word on anything, or read it cautiously.
This is also why you group reviews of the same show together so that you can get an opinion from more than one person (if applicable).
but nothing to say on the actual show?
The 10 system can still go in there. On Anime-Planet, since they don't use a 10 system, I divide my MAL scores in half. A 7/10 is a 3.5/5 there.Still, I personally think that a simpler scoring scheme like 5 stars would be more useful to people trying to get an idea of a show's quality.
Scoring from 0.0 to 10.0, which is basically the same as scoring from 0-100, is way more specific than we need. All we really need is "okay it's 3 stars, so its good... this one's 4 stars so it's great... this one's 5 stars so it's amazing/must-see"
Okay, I was just wondering as I'm used to seeing mainly reviews on the product and the show in the same review. I don't see many reviews on just the show, and I don't see any on just packaging really (It's practically unheard of.). I'm just too used to stuff like this.Obviously, that goes in the other topic.
But what does it mean, a brief rundown on just the packaging, audio, video, and more, but nothing to say on the actual show?
Nothing on Audio/Video unless there's something special about it (like whatever upscaled blah blah blah BECAUSE it's a limited edition), otherwise keep that and the show in the show reviews. You can link 'em to that post instead of creating a post there since this thread is focused about material.But what does it mean, a brief rundown on just the packaging, audio, video, and more, but nothing to say on the actual show?
I never really liked ratings out of 5 personally, because it forces you to adjust your tastes to it. A 3/5 is pretty iffy to me; nothing "good" or close to it. Say you hated a story, but you found the animation to be spectacular... 2/5 doesn't feel right, so you give it a 3/5.... now comes along a show with decent everything, but lame-oh characters... It's not fantastic so it's definitely not a 5, everything was MEH, so would give it a 4, but now you got to count in the demerit for having dumb characters. Now it's a 3, on the same level as a crappy show with beautiful art... Get where I'm going with this? Rating something out of 10 is honestly not difficult to read or understand, and with it gives you a much more accurate impression of what you thought of the show... You can't give something a 5/10 with 2 or 3 stars....Still, I personally think that a simpler scoring scheme like 5 stars would be more useful to people trying to get an idea of a show's quality.
Scoring from 0.0 to 10.0, which is basically the same as scoring from 0-100, is way more specific than we need. All we really need is "okay it's 3 stars, so its good... this one's 4 stars so it's great... this one's 5 stars so it's amazing/must-see"
That's just my opinion though. If you guys would rather give very specific (and also very arbitrary to the readers) scores, then that'll work too.
Nothing on Audio/Video unless there's something special about it (like whatever upscaled blah blah blah BECAUSE it's a limited edition), otherwise keep that and the show in the show reviews. You can link 'em to that post instead of creating a post there since this thread is focused about material.
I never really liked ratings out of 5 personally, because it forces you to adjust your tastes to it. A 3/5 is pretty iffy to me; nothing "good" or close to it. Say you hated a story, but you found the animation to be spectacular... 2/5 doesn't feel right, so you give it a 3/5.... now comes along a show with decent everything, but lame-oh characters... It's not fantastic so it's definitely not a 5, everything was MEH, so would give it a 4, but now you got to count in the demerit for having dumb characters. Now it's a 3, on the same level as a crappy show with beautiful art... Get where I'm going with this? Rating something out of 10 is honestly not difficult to read or understand, and with it gives you a much more accurate impression of what you thought of the show... You can't give something a 5/10 with 2 or 3 stars....
Still, I personally think that a simpler scoring scheme like 5 stars would be more useful to people trying to get an idea of a show's quality.
Scoring from 0.0 to 10.0, which is basically the same as scoring from 0-100, is way more specific than we need. All we really need is "okay it's 3 stars, so its good... this one's 4 stars so it's great... this one's 5 stars so it's amazing/must-see"
That's just my opinion though. If you guys would rather give very specific (and also very arbitrary to the readers) scores, then that'll work too.
How about this, people can use whatever system the feel like? It's specific for that reviewer. What you can have like a letter grade, a 10 system, a 5 system, or even a 100 system.
True, but we're talking out of 10.0 here... not just out of 10. But 5 stars, if you allow half stars, is essentially 10 out of 10. 👍
And I think rating things by stars is easier to digest/relate to than just a number value.
True, but we're talking out of 10.0 here... not just out of 10. But 5 stars, if you allow half stars, is essentially 10 out of 10. 👍
And I think rating things by stars is easier to digest/relate to than just a number value.
Fine, we'll leave out the decimal, so 0-10
While stars may be easier to digest, but where the hell are you getting the stars from? you're not going to type out asterisks because that looks dinky, but at the same time, copy and pasting the img url of an image of a star is messy when composing your post.
In other news, 🤬! Ano Natsu de Matteru isn't what I thought it was going to be at all! I am very upset now. I'm going to bed...
This will feel weird, but might as well go and review just the packaging, sound, video (I feel like including these as it can be a big deal to people (People raged at the poor encoding on the first Geneon Samurai Champloo box set for example.), and some things can be different from legal streams, illegal streams, torrents, etc.), and extras on a few of my releases. I'll post them and see how it turns out, and what you guys think.
Sounds good. Looking forward to it. 👍
Created the thread for anime reviews: https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/group.php?do=discuss&discussionid=2413
👍 But where's the guidelines and rules at bro?!
Shouldn't have posted the link so soon, dumb-dumb.
In short, I kind of agree with Lain. Who is really Walter. Who is really FC3 Eastman. Who is really James. Who is really a human. Who is really a collection of atoms. Who is really a collection of tiny string cheese particles, yummeh!
lolwut?
You actually agree with me?
Not sure where you're getting the 8 thing. I've given two 7/10's lately, Nabari no Ou, and Mashiroiro Symphony. Shakugan no Shana III which I'm currently watching is a 6/10. This third season is really not all that good. It's decent at best.And TheCorvette will just give everything 8 or higher anyhow
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2012-01-10/media-blasters-lays-off-60-percent-of-its-staffI know right? It is just how I roll, troll people and then sometimes agree with them. But don't count on it.
I think the real shocker will be if I ever agree with TheCorvette on much of anything.
Now excuse me, I have to go destroy the anime industry.