Seems about right. Like you're saying the middle bar is more of an indicator than an actual rev counter. I like the design but there's too much duplicate information. (Just give us options, PD.The dial shows the entire range but the sliding bar seems to show only the rpm's in the higher, more usable range, maybe the last 1500 rpm. Actually a good move on their part as it gives you a better look at the useful rpm range and also acts as a shift indicator as it flashes and changes colour like it does on most modern race cars.
I bet that if Sony would drop them, they wouldn't be able to survive on themselves anymore solely by the quality (or lack thereof) of their games.
That's an interesting theory. I wonder how drastically different GT would be with a different publisher; not just the content, but if the current criticisms in the game would be addressed immediately.They would be out the game completely. Look at Evolution Studios after Sony dropped them, they were completely finished. Luckily Codemasters were willing to take on Evolution and their staff but PD would go the exact same way without Sony funding them, they would simply have to close up or find a publisher willing to fund them.
Indeed, i said before that i think it would have been wiser for Sony to keep backing up Evolution studios and drop PD instead. At least the guys at Evo where up to date and managed to offer a good all round simcade experience. Gorgeous graphics, an attractive car lineup and decent sounds to boot.They would be out the game completely. Look at Evolution Studios after Sony dropped them, they were completely finished. Luckily Codemasters were willing to take on Evolution and their staff but PD would go the exact same way without Sony funding them, they would simply have to close up or find a publisher willing to fund them.
So you think PD should have been closed in favor of a studio whose games sold nowhere near as well just because you don't like recent GT installments?Indeed, i said before that i think it would have been wiser for Sony to keep backing up Evolution studios and drop PD instead. At least the guys at Evo where up to date and managed to offer a good all round simcade experience. Gorgeous graphics, an attractive car lineup and decent sounds to boot.
But Kaz is settled in over at Sony's board so he's handed a free ticket to do whatever basically.
That's an interesting theory. I wonder how drastically different GT would be with a different publisher; not just the content, but if the current criticisms in the game would be addressed immediately.
Why do you think GT still sells? Not because of the quality of their games but only because of Sony's backing, the marketing machine that goes with it, and the brand name.So you think PD should have been closed in favor of a studio whose games sold nowhere near as well just because you don't like recent GT installments?
If I ever start a company, remind me not to make you CEO.![]()
But now you have 140 cars instead of 137!This has to stop, no more duplicates. The Mazda LM55 Vision, they both are literally the same car with the same livery even. Aside from the PP, there's no real difference. *facepalm*
![]()
Why are GT's sales always brought up in comparison to other games? GT6 might as well been a flop in comparison to the other 5 titles; it didn't even sell half as many copies as Gran Turismo 2.So you think PD should have been closed in favor of a studio whose games sold nowhere near as well just because you don't like recent GT installments?
If I ever start a company, remind me not to make you CEO.![]()
Because it's only relevant in comparison to other titles. If you're in as big a financial ****-hole as Sony is at the moment, and you have one franchise that's selling well right now, and another franchise that is very similar but isn't selling as well, which one are you going to axe? The less popular one. It's common sense.Why are GT's sales always brought up in comparison to other games? GT6 might as well been a flop in comparison to the other 5 titles; it didn't even sell half as many copies as Gran Turismo 2.
So you think PD should have been closed in favor of a studio whose games sold nowhere near as well just because you don't like recent GT installments?
If I ever start a company, remind me not to make you CEO.![]()
pffft, more like 70!But now you have 140 cars instead of 137!
Gt still sells because people still enjoy the games Pd make also Evolution studios had a golden opportunity and they blew it.Why do you think GT still sells? Not because of the quality of their games but only because of Sony's backing, the marketing machine that goes with it, and the brand name.
All of those goodies can easily be handed over to Evo, and they will grow in popularity and sales numbers as a consequence.
Probably. But the fact is, GT6 sold more than Driveclub did in the same span. Therefore it's smarter to axe DC's developers than GT's. Is it a pleasant decision to have to make? No. But at the end it's more logical.Put the GT name on Driveclub I guarantee it'd have sold a lot more. A huge amount of their sales are on brand name and reputation, not game quality.
Gran Turismo 6 sold 7.23 million units less than Gran Turismo 5; its sold 4.70 million.Because it's only relevant in comparison to other titles. If you're in as big a financial ****-hole as Sony is at the moment, and you have one franchise that's selling well right now, and another franchise that is very similar but isn't selling as well, which one are you going to axe? The less popular one. It's common sense.
But, if you go that route, none of Evo's games have even come close to any GT title. So your opinion doesn't make any sense from that angle either.Gran Turismo 6 sold 7.23 million units less than Gran Turismo 5; its sold 4.70 million.
Driveclub sold around 3 million short of GT6 on its first outing.
Common sense would be taking more than just numbers into account.
They blew the launch but by all accounts they really turned it around after that and ended up selling 2 million units, close to recent Forza games in sales and pretty good for an arcade racer. I guess Sony was looking for a home run but ended up with a stand up double instead and just weren't satisfied.Gt still sells because people still enjoy the games Pd make also Evolution studios had a golden opportunity and they blew it.
Nope, probably closer to half actually.But, if you go that route, none of Evo's games have even come close to any GT title. So your opinion doesn't make any sense from that angle either.
And, sure, you can try to twist words to make DC's debut sound more impressive than it actually was, but look at it like this: it sold less than a quarter of what GT6 did.
Think outside the box, imagine the GT logo and "evolution studios" in small letters on the same case. 3-4 million copies guaranteed. Won't happen now and brand names don't get carried over like that but things can chance and DC can become the next GT with the right backing.But, if you go that route, none of Evo's games have even come close to any GT title. So your opinion doesn't make any sense from that angle either.
And, sure, you can try to twist words to make DC's debut sound more impressive than it actually was, but look at it like this: it sold less than a quarter of what GT6 did.
Probably. But the fact is, GT6 sold more than Driveclub did in the same span. Therefore it's smarter to axe DC's developers than GT's. Is it a pleasant decision to have to make? No. But at the end it's more logical.
They blew the launch but by all accounts they really turned it around after that and ended up selling 2 million units, close to recent Forza games in sales and pretty good for an arcade racer..
Probably. But the fact is, GT6 sold more than Driveclub did in the same span. Therefore it's smarter to axe DC's developers than GT's. Is it a pleasant decision to have to make? No. But at the end it's more logical.
Half of 4,710,000 is 2,355,000. Last I checked, Driveclub sold over 2 million copies as of July 2015. A quarter of GT6's sales would be 1,177,500, so come again as to how Driveclub sold less than 1.18 million copies.But, if you go that route, none of Evo's games have even come close to any GT title. So your opinion doesn't make any sense from that angle either.
And, sure, you can try to twist words to make DC's debut sound more impressive than it actually was, but look at it like this: it sold less than a quarter of what GT6 did.
I thought the sarcasm would have been easy to detect as I liked your post.pffft, more like 70!
In which, I can't find the thought process behind this. 140 cars isn't that much better than the real number of models in the game anyway. I understood it for GT5 & 6 to some degree as over 1,000 or 1,200 cars sounds like a nice thing to advertise. But for a car list this small, no! Just be fricken honest, it's not complex!