The GT6 Epic Whining and Crying Thread

  • Thread starter HaylRayzor
  • 6,682 comments
  • 422,541 views
Does everyone have to be a ***** on here?

You-Stay-Classy-San-Diego-Anchorman.gif
 
There are many challenges that can be tried over and over again.
Grinding is now an official feature.

eco-challenges where you compete for how far you can drive on just 1 litre of petrol
Hilarious. Also new in GT6:
Use a paint chip and watch how the paint on your car dries.
Experience a total absence of sensations getting your lunar rover vehicle to a top speed of 8mph.


But I was wrong all along. GT6 is gonna be the best GT ever and Kaz is a genius:
There are no more standard cars from GT5. Enjoy standard equivalent cars in GT6.
Who needs a CLS AMG when you can just park your Vauxhall Tigra '99 (or Opel Tigra '99, because the car list is huge) on the side of the track and enjoy watching the Milky Way Galaxy on your TV, so you don't need to go outside anymore to see stars.
Learning curve will not be steep, as GT6 will gradually be released in future upgrades.
Hahahaha this would make for a hilarious infomercial
 
Bathurst is pretty good (for a real-world track). About half of it has got some nice tight bits and elevation changes. Most real-world tracks are a lot more boring. Still, I'd take El Capitan over it in a heartbeat.
Tight bits and elevation changes, eh? Ever heard of Nurburgring Nordschleife? It happens to be in GT6 as well, and guess what, it's a real life track!
I think tracks should be created 'bob ross' style. When Turn #6 needs something extra to look at, maybe draw in a cabin and a few tall trees to keep it company. Maybe toss in a 'happy little' creek. Yeah, I play fighting games largely for the backgrounds too--I'll fess up to that.

Not just the off-track scenery either. I tend to like slower cars, and it's just no fun running on a course built for F1 when you're packing less than 200hp. GT-original tracks often have cornering conditions that would never fly in real-life racing.
So the reason you want PD to focus on original tracks instead of real life ones, is because you enjoy taking a slow car around them looking at the scenery? Wow, that's great. 👍
 
Quite a bit of fun I guess eh? Novelty is my guess, or give people a chance to drive something they couldn't before, much like super cars. Same purpose in its inclusion. But I do admit it's pretty silly.

Oh my.. PD Defence Force in full. People don't buy GT to drive moon cars uhg... Nr. 1 car on request list is an E30 M3 and PD's logic is let't give them a moon car and you still don't see the problem? I feel like some of you guys would pay full price for GT1 on a blu-ray disc if Kaz told you it was the best game ever...
 
Oh my.. PD Defence Force in full. People don't buy GT to drive moon cars uhg... Nr. 1 car on request list is an E30 M3 and PD's logic is let't give them a moon car and you still don't see the problem?

On why the E30 is not in the game is not relevant. I was saying the lunar rover gives people a chance to drive what they never could have, not that they asked for it. No one knows why the E30 is neglected, so I don't know.

I feel like some of you guys would pay full price for GT1 on a blu-ray disc if Kaz told you it was the best game ever...

If it had GT2 and (probably a stretch) GT3 and GT4 then yes! I still play the games and having them remastered in HD would be great.
 
Now I think this GT6 should have been a spec 3 update to GT5 and a real GT6 for PS4. 8 tracks!, I can make them less in a year.

Lol, Only 2 of these, and 1 classic tracks

I miss you Midfield :(

And Tahiti, and Seatle, and SSR11...


GT6 will make for a great.... used game.. late 2014...
 
I'd rather have them deleted, as they make the game inconsistent.

Are you serious?

So tell me, does that giant stick hurt at all? Or are you used to it by now? "No coffee breaks! only serious racing! No moon car! Only fast cars! No standard cars! Premium or nothing!"...Did you ever think that they added those things...because they might be...fun.

1fun
noun\ˈfən\
: someone or something that is amusing or enjoyable : an enjoyable experience or person

: an enjoyable or amusing time

: the feeling of being amused or entertained
 
No sign of weight distribution figures in the car info unless I missed it. If it's not there then consider this my official cry and whinge about it. It's been a feature of that other franchise since 2007.
 
Could those pictures be from a Japanese version of the game, which tacks on a few 0s to prices?

No, the site says all pictures are from the pre-final US version. Personally I thinks those suites can still be won. So I don't mind the high price tag. Also you don't have to race a thousand races to win a fitting helmet for you favorite suite.
 
On why the E30 is not in the game is not relevant. I was saying the lunar rover gives people a chance to drive what they never could have, not that they asked for it. No one knows why the E30 is neglected, so I don't know.



If it had GT2 and (probably a stretch) GT3 and GT4 then yes! I still play the games and having them remastered in HD would be great.
Pffff... People don't buy GT games to drive a Lunar Rover and the E30 M3 not being in the game is relevent! It is what people that buy a car game about cars want, how hard is that for you to understand? I don't have a problem with them adding some odd cars, I have a problem with them investing time in useless cars when they could have made a car people are actually looking forward to driving. People are not going to spend hours in that moon machine. They win it, drive it once or twice and after that it collects virtual dust.

Never said anything about them adding GT2, 3, 4 and doing a remastered HD version. Some buy anything with a GT badge on it. Don't mind the worst sounds in any car game, the bad AI, the imagination lacking carreer mode and the 80% PS2 looking cars... Ugh...
 
The DeltaWing thing is another emblematic example of PD's lack of perfeccionism and the utter mess that characterize their last works. At this pace, we won't get a GT8. PD won't survive that long.
 
Pffff... People don't buy GT games to drive a Lunar Rover and the E30 M3 not being in the game is relevent!

True, they buy GT games for driving. The Lunar Rover is just a little feature.

It is what people that buy a car game about cars want, how hard is that for you to understand?

Very easy, that's exactly why everyone buys a car game.

I don't have a problem with them adding some odd cars, I have a problem with them investing time in useless cars when they could have made a car people are actually looking forward to driving. People are not going to spend hours in that moon machine. They win it, drive it once or twice and after that it collects virtual dust.

That may be the case for you, but not everyone. I doubt the game allows the player to drive the Rover outside of certain conditions it was set in.

Never said anything about them adding GT2, 3, 4 and doing a remastered HD version.

I know you didn't, which is why I start with "If it had". Also why wouldn't a remade GT1 or any GT be remastered in HD?

Some buy anything with a GT badge on it. Don't mind the worst sounds in any car game, the bad AI, the imagination lacking carreer mode and the 80% PS2 looking cars... Ugh...

I don't see what's wrong with that.
 
Back