- 9,089
- Scotland
Famine, ruining people's hopes and dreams since 2003, or when ever people found out he wasn't a girl.....
I am so glad you weren't around during the early days of NASA. We'd be bowing to Russia's every demand if we followed your thought process.What I am saying, is that it almost seemed a farce - I'm obviously biased towards touring cars, so maybe I should leave before really, really thrashing Le Mans... But I don't understand the purpose of a 24 hour race if it's not to be the pinnacle of engineering...
And, if the cars don't make it to the end, then they're not the pinnacle of engineering.
Do you understand what "endurance" means?Why even bother starting a race if you can't finish? Why spend the money?
And, if the cars don't make it to the end, then they're not the pinnacle of engineering. I could take my Subaru Impreza, make it a hybrid, and get a Top 5 in LMP1-H.
And, this technology will inevitably end up in your Kia Optima, Hyundai Accent or Audi A4. I sense trouble with the road cars that get these powerplants. I sincerely hope I'm wrong, though.
No. No you couldn't.
You really, really shouldn't be able to win the race if you spent that much time in the pits.
Oh come on dude, don't be so harsh on him. He's just talking in... what was it? Exaggerated reality? I think that was it.
I've watched Endurance racing for my whole life mate so don't tell me I don't know what I'm watching. I stand by what I said.
The problem is that the drivers think it is a sprint. They ride kerbs as if it doesn't matter and then shrug their shoulders when the car fails.
If not a single one of them is able to get a clean run through the race then something is very wrong indeed.
Therefore I recommend that YOU watch a bit more Endurance racing.
Then you'll know why the LMP2 race was not won by the fastest driver or the fastest car, but the one that was driven by drivers who understood what endurance racing is.
Courtesy of Le Mans:
Yes, a dog wearing a Pescarolo T shirt.
Actually they aren't going flat out as if it was a sprint, it was stated at Le Mans that if they didn't have all the fuel restrictions and litre per lap rule they would be lapping 10 seconds a lap faster.
Well let's take the audis for example, if the kerbs are causing the issues then how would that contribute to the #3 audi getting rear ended or the #1 and #2 turbos failing?That's not what I mean. It's the drivers riding the kerbs that is the issue. It sends vibrations through the car that actively contribute to spending time in the pits fixing what they've broken.
Made this last night, posted it in the race thread but since the discussion there has stopped, I've decided to post it in a more active thread so here:
If people really like this, I'll do the same for the Nurburgring 24 Hours.
Well are you saying it did? And if it did I wait for the article to back up the claim, I've never seen a turbo fail on our race cars at Knockhill which is heavy on kerbs.Are you suggesting that vibration sent through the car don't contribute to that sort of failure on a car?
As for#3 if the idiot driver hadn't been doing approximately 2 mph perhaps he wouldn't have caused such a big accident?
Well are you saying it did? And if it did I wait for the article to back up the claim, I've never seen a turbo fail on our race cars at Knockhill which is heavy on kerbs.
Same with our na race cars like the fiestas and minis and again if you can show that the toyota electrics failed due to kerb riding I'll await that too.
Well are you saying it did? And if it did I wait for the article to back up the claim, I've never seen a turbo fail on our race cars at Knockhill which is heavy on kerbs.
Same with our na race cars like the fiestas and minis and again if you can show that the toyota electrics failed due to kerb riding I'll await that too.
Are you suggesting that vibration sent through the car don't contribute to that sort of failure on a car?
As for#3 if the idiot driver hadn't been doing approximately 2 mph perhaps he wouldn't have caused such a big accident?
Vibrations loosen up the connections?
Are you claiming it's the #3s fault that he was wrecked?
Famine, ruining people's hopes and dreams since 2003, or when ever people found out he wasn't a girl.....
Considering the Hunaudieres were looking more like a river than a motorway at the time, I think both the #8 and #81 should be at blame for that accident... From the #92 Porsche's onboard, the Toyota appears sideways out of nowhere at [Spaceballs]ludicrous speed[/Spaceballs] with the #81 Ferrari close behind, and carnage ensues as they come across a pack of 4-5 cars that were going slowly. I do think the #8 would have crashed even if there hadn't been a gaggle of cars there at the time.
The brake lights looked as though that was the case, but it appears as though he was gently squeezing the pedal to stop it from aquaplaning.The Ferrari didn't look like it was slowing down at all.
Audi #3 slows to a crawl along with a Ferrari and a P2 car blocking the track.
crash @ 7:30
Its a huge WTF for the race director Eduardo Freitas.The track should have gone code 60 from the esses all the way down the Mulsanne straight 5 minutes before that wreck.Terrible leadership led to that wreck.
Thankfully he was around later to slow down that evil Proton Porsche that endangered hundreds/thousands of lives by burning rubber leaving the pits.