The Realistic Photo Thread

[20832]

Why shouldn't this be realistic?
Yes, it could also be classified as artistic, but in the end it's edited to look as realistic as possible.

It's not like the car drives through a Town in the Year 2142.

 

[matt-mtb]

Why shouldn't this be realistic?
Yes, it could also be classified as artistic, but in the end it's edited to look as realistic as possible.

It's not like the car drives through a Town in the Year 2142.

👍

 

[kornGT]

 

[RomanBidnyy]

4 by UkrainianHype, on Flickr

 

[hennessey86]

Why shouldn't this be realistic?
Yes, it could also be classified as artistic, but in the end it's edited to look as realistic as possible.

It's not like the car drives through a Town in the Year 2142.

That's not what I meant, how can this represent a realistic GT5 photo when it's heavily edited. Like I said it's a great photo but I thought this thread was for realistic shots using gt5 photomode

 

[Diogo]

That's not what I meant, how can this represent a realistic GT5 photo when it's heavily edited. Like I said it's a great photo but I thought this thread was for realistic shots using gt5 photomode

No. it's in general. Edited or not.

 

[MoMo PeeZero]

This is my first post here, wanna see if I can make the cut. I'm open to advice.

 

[OHM_fusion]

That's not what I meant, how can this represent a realistic GT5 photo when it's heavily edited. Like I said it's a great photo but I thought this thread was for realistic shots using gt5 photomode

To be honest, I think you need to edit the photos anyway because in my experience they get a bit blurrier and darker when transferring them from PS3 to PC, and not to mention that many people's TV's are calibrated differently from their monitors. And those differences in lightning and colors are very important when taking realistic photos.

I know some people think of editing as "cheating", but I personally think photos should be edited simply to restore them to their "original" quality (as shown on your TV). And if the author believes that further editing can make the photo more realistic, I think they should be allowed to do that. Then again, people might say that some editing is fine, but then the question is where do you draw the line between "just enough" and "too much" editing.

 

[MoMo PeeZero]

Okay, I am learning to upload photos, am sorry, going to try and post again, no photoshop, just the gt5 controls, all natural as it were. So, here it is.

[/IMG]

[/IMG]

[/IMG]

 

[e30 freek]

Can't see them ^

 

[Eric1512]

​

​

 

[gtuned]

quite loving this shot.​

 

[taz]

 

[LOGAN8TOR88]

I thought this looked pretty nice.

 

[nissanfanatic]

Ha, another Kaz mobile... Click for big

 

[carfanatic45]

http://www.flickr.com/photos/gtunedgt5/8041467438/
quite loving this shot.

That is the most amazing and epic thing I have ever seen!!

 

[LOGAN8TOR88]

Tell me what you think... I love how photogenic this car is!

 

[kornGT]

 

[[Nor]MclarenF1]

​

 

[Diogo]

​

 

[Taiga]

​

 

[gtuned]

JADEN, WAT R U DOIN. STAHP JADEN. STAHP MAKIN US LUK BAD.


​

 

[NBDESIGNZ]

​

 

[nealcropper]

Loving that Alfa shot

 

[kennylmao]

Damn Gtuned. Love the smoking tires, both your Ferraris look badass!

 

[DarkR]

​

 

[20832]

quite loving this shot.​

/thread

 

[RomanBidnyy]

car (1 of 3)-6 by UkrainianHype, on Flickr

car (2 of 3)-7 by UkrainianHype, on Flickr

car (3 of 3)-7 by UkrainianHype, on Flickr

 

[kennylmao]

FERRARI F2007S



Hope this belongs here ​

 

[e30 freek]

MGWQjPR7SVggJQLFwo_0_Hagrid_Cyborg_Film by Zhen2001, on Flickr
B2wzLw6f2dhqe0DzxA_0_Lucas_Skin_Film by Zhen2001, on Flickr
N9xUkzfv2tA78auqGc_0_Harry_Wall_Film by Zhen2001, on Flickr