A five year-old does not have the same rights and privileges as that of someone aged 18 or over. The reason for minors lacking a lot of those rights and privileges is for protection. Minors cannot for the most part protect themselves and so require adults to do so for them, which is done in part by the system affording the rights and privileges to be able to protect children to those adults.
This is all true, yet there's still not a comparison to be made. Cannon Hinnant didn't die because of the power imbalance between a child and an adult; if he were 18 or older, he still wouldn't survive getting shot in the head. An argument could definitely be made that George Floyd would not have died were it not for the greater power that Derek Chauvin's job granted him.
The racial component is really what's driving the discussions at large about both this murder and George Floyd's.
You're right, but they're very different discussions. The conversation around George Floyd and race is about the way his race intersects with a history of police brutality in this country. The discussion about Cannon Hinnant's race, to this point, is nothing more than a flimsy attempt by some to manufacture hypocrisy on the part of BLM protestors. Because as you said:
So far there is also little to no evidence of any racial motivation in Cannon Hinnant's murder
Race may have played a factor, but as yet, that's not at all established. And until it is, people shouldn't be expected to engage in conversations that presuppose that race was a factor.
There have been several incidents of white suspects being killed by cops in similar circumstances to George Floyd in recent years (some of which were by black cops), none of which have provoked the reaction that George Floyd's did, despite the same abuses of power committed by the cops in question.
I'm genuinely curious to know of one. Find me a white person killed by cops while already subdued and restrained who had committed no crime other than possibly spending a counterfeit bill, something which almost all of us have unknowingly done at some point.
There is little to no evidence from the recently-released body cam footage of the entire police interaction with George Floyd of any racial biases.
And that's where the argument lies, isn't it? There is certainly enough history of cops mistreated black folks in this country, that you can't completely dismiss it. People are going to see what they want to see from it. I personally am not aware of any white folks dying in a set of circumstances like George Floyd. If you can provide a couple, I'd certainly have to reconsider my viewpoint. You're far from the first person to declare "same thing happens to white people all the time, so it's not racism." You would, however, be the first to actually provide an example that doesn't play really loose with how "similar" the circumstances are.
But you can guarantee something as heinous as this would get BLM's attention if the races were reversed, and inevitably trigger more riots.
Nobody can guarantee that. Hypothetical arguments are lazy, and nobody here is required to engage them.
Even if you leave out the racial element or any discussions about BLM or police brutality as just look at this as a cold-blooded murder, the media silence at large over something like this is deafening.
If you leave out the racial element, and you've already acknowledged that it hasn't yet been at all established, then all you have is juste one murder among the dozens that happen every day, and get no attention at all. Which actually means this case is getting
more attention than expected. Why don't you find the silence over the other murders that same day "deafening?"