- 152
- Killumaniti
what are the odds of GT5 at e309? and what were the odds of GT5 being at e308?
Last year Nintendo showed that an absolutely abysmal E3 will not affect your business.Seriously, Sony will be betting the future of their videogame business on a successful E3.
There were no reliable rumors or news for E3 08 and Sony wasn't talking about their biggest E3 ever, and taking up three booth spaces. Everything points toward something big, including Sony's own bragging.what are the odds of GT5 at e309? and what were the odds of GT5 being at e308?
Seriously, Sony will be betting the future of their videogame business on a successful E3.
They need to launch PSP2/GO and multiple AAA titles that are as yet unanounced.
In addition they need a $50+ price cut
even more new I.P's
greater PS3 functionality
It's make or break for Sony, the PS3 and the PSP, they can't delay major announcements any longer.
what are the odds of GT5 at e309? and what were the odds of GT5 being at e308?
Well considering that its 2009 I do believe they showed some stuff at E3 08 so 100% for E3 08, and probably 90% for E3 09.
...SNIP...
Not this again...
Seriously no... heck even the PS2 and PSP are still beating the 360 in many regards, and despite what you may have heard, the PS3 is selling world wide at a faster sales pace than the 360 (which was also brought up recently in the other cryptic thread by Amar, HERE)... despite the *higher cost.
I know how quickly the PS3 is selling, but Sony's target isn't the 360, it's the Wii and Nintendo, they're unlikely to topple them, but they need to be far closer. The PS3's launch has been nothing short of dreadfull, only now is the system begining to show what it's capable of. Even then sales haven't taken off, for that to happen we need a major price cut and 2009 releases for titles like GT5.
How do you work out that Sony's target for PS3 sales is the Wii?
You are really going to have to back every single bit of this paragraph up. Sony has focused the PS2 on the Wii, not the PS3. The PS3 competes with the 360, which is why recently Sony did some stats juggling (they are right, but it's all in how you look at the numbers) to show that the PS3 has a higher attach rate than the 360.I know how quickly the PS3 is selling, but Sony's target isn't the 360, it's the Wii and Nintendo, they're unlikely to topple them, but they need to be far closer. The PS3's launch has been nothing short of dreadfull, only now is the system begining to show what it's capable of. Even then sales haven't taken off, for that to happen we need a major price cut and 2009 releases for titles like GT5.
Why is it that this keeps getting said? I can't argue against it, but it seems counter-intuitive as every other industry claims digital distribution helps piracy. Plus, I thought the rumored UMD cut was because of space constraints as UMDs hold under 2GB.Sony moving to a download only future in a move to cut piracy.
Really? Who? If you are talking about D-N he showed facts and stats to back up his statements, you just said stuff. Also, note that I hyperlinked my sources for everything I said.All of the above ties into GT5, this E3 Sony has to deliver on all fronts. Some posters appear to be preparing themselves for disspointment, rather than criticise PD, they make excuses for them.
You are aware that features you feel are necessary are not the same for everyone else, right? If PD promises it and doesn't deliver, that is one thing, but saying you wanted something that isn't there is not PD's fault. And so far, GT5 has yet to be delayed as it has yet to be given a date.I'm a driving sim enthusiast, Gran Turismo is of interest to me as it's delivered the goods, but if GT5 lacks features and is delayed time and again, I'll call them out for it.
Wow, really? Can you link me to their announcements that lead you to believe this? I might have to check it out.I'm quite sure Forza 3 will match if not beat GT5 in most areas,
I know how quickly the PS3 is selling, but Sony's target isn't the 360, it's the Wii and Nintendo
How do you work out that Sony's target for PS3 sales is the Wii?
Yeah, i don't see much crossover between the two systems. Yes they're both 'next-gen' consoles but you can't really compare the two. One is a serious and powerful games machine and media player and the other is the gaming equivalent of a karaoke machine. It's a bit of fun if you're a kid or you have friends round and fancy acting like a kid, but it has no real depth.
Both consoles are great at what they do, but they are essentially different concepts altogether. If people want a PS3 (or X360) they'll get one. If they want a Wii, they'll get one as well - but not instead. Some folk might just want a Wii, but they were probably unlikely to be in the market for an X-box or Playstation in the first place.
Sony has focused the PS2 on the Wii, not the PS3. The PS3 competes with the 360, which is why recently Sony did some stats juggling (they are right, but it's all in how you look at the numbers) to show that the PS3 has a higher attach rate than the 360.
The PS3 competes with the Wii and 360, technology is irrelevant. Sony have moved from a dominant first place last generation, to last this. At this point the 360 is also cheaper than the Wii. It's no coincidence both the PS3 and 360 are rumoured to be recieving new motion controllers.You are really going to have to back every single bit of this paragraph up. Sony has focused the PS2 on the Wii, not the PS3. The PS3 competes with the 360, which is why recently Sony did some stats juggling (they are right, but it's all in how you look at the numbers) to show that the PS3 has a higher attach rate than the 360.
The 360 is also a relative flop, it's an under performing, unreliable cash hole for Microsoft, but they don't care, they want market share, hence the early launch.And how exactly has the PS3's launch been dreadful? They have been selling at the same rate as the 360 when comparing the life of the systems. The 360's overall sales lead has only to do with their one year lead. If the PS3 has had a dreadful launch then apparently so did the 360.
As for the price cut, you are right, that will increase sales. But that is the same as saying the sky is blue. All gaming systems have the majority of their sales after they dip below certain price points.
The PSP has a 50% piracy rate as UMD's can be ripped with ease, are clunky to operate, and power hungry. Downloads can be controlled with DRM.Why is it that this keeps getting said? I can't argue against it, but it seems counter-intuitive as every other industry claims digital distribution helps piracy. Plus, I thought the rumored UMD cut was because of space constraints as UMDs hold under 2GB.
You are aware that features you feel are necessary are not the same for everyone else, right? If PD promises it and doesn't deliver, that is one thing, but saying you wanted something that isn't there is not PD's fault. And so far, GT5 has yet to be delayed as it has yet to be given a date.
Wow, really? Can you link me to their announcements that lead you to believe this? I might have to check it out.
If housewives are buying a Wii and common gamers are buying/using 360 or PS3 they are hitting much different markets, thus why the Wii has the lowest attach rate. Console sales mean little if the game sales don't match.The PS3 competes with the Wii and 360, technology is irrellevant.
Here you have a legitimate point, but if their games don't compete a new controller still means nothing. At most I would say this is Sony and Microsoft attempting to pull some of the games sales for multi-console owners like me.Sony have moved from a totally dominant first place last generation to last this. At this point the 360 is also cheaper than the Wii. It's no coincidence both the PS3 and 360 are rumoured to be recieving new motion controllers.
Relative to what? We were discussing launches and the PS2 is the most successful console out with over 100 million sold and the PS3 and 360 had very similar first years.The 360 is also a relative flop,
How so? First of all, Sony can live on without the PlayStation brand. They did it for decades. Secondly, E3 is one show. Sony could not show at E3 at all and still put out a year full of great games while making announcements over time. What E3 has done is lead to this drought of info we have right now that people are complaining about because companies like Sony and Microsoft hold all their good details until E3 so they can have a big show. E3 is just an industry wide media stunt.That isn't my point, I'm saying E3 is pivotal to Sony and the PS3's future.
Explain this. You keep saying it but all you can do is compare it to a system that sold for nearly 1/3 of the price and was chasing the more casual market. The Wii is going after a mostly different market. No one will catch it because it is an oddity, not the trend. The PS3 and 360 are matching industry trends in console sales and attach rates. The Wii has tripled industry trends in console sales and fallen below attach rates.The PS3 has underperformed
Where did you get that number? It may seem high, but compared to PC, it is extremely low. Oh, and PC does have DRM, as does music and movies. DRM controls little.The PSP has a 50% piracy rate as UMD's can be ripped with ease, are clunky to operate, and power hungry. Downloads can be controlled with DRM.
I have never made it a secret that I disagree with your synopsis. I prefer the ~150hp cars over a supercar any day.car list (Porsche, Ferrari, less filler, more quality)
This argument.....again? I'll let D-N post one of his very, very, very long lists of highly rated PS3 games. EDIT: He already did.Bottom line, not only do Sony have to deliver a spectacular E3, they also need AAA software on the shelves in short order.
Considering you now have two less things than you did a year ago (Ferrari, online) I think it is safe to say that the GT series is trying to make changes.'what, still no damage/weather/Porsche/ etc.'
Ugh, GRID is the one of the most horrible driving games i played so far, DiRT 1 was better, i hope they dont ruin the 2nd one.Codemasters really seem to have done a great job, lets hope for multiplayer and better handling.
The [Wii] competes with the [PS3] and 360, technology is irrelevant.
i don't want to insult anyone's fragile biasism towards any platform or game series but if GT series haven't happened in 98 we would probably still be racing only racecars on racetracks without any coherent structure. also, without many gameplay assets of gt series genre would still be dull as whiteboard. so if pd would pack theirs bags, you can bet that evolution would be pretty much sustained. not to even mention that games such as segagt, enthusia and forza would never exist in their form if there was no gt. so you can pretty much call yourself either ignorant, missinformed or deliberately biased - conclusion remains the same. sorry for capitalisation and formatting, im writing this on web browser of my obscure and overpaid bluray player tha eventually lets me to play games from time to time .
Yeah... you provide a link to a shootout in which the brain trusts discuss sound quality by comparing the MUSIC.You'll find Turn 10 and the Forza series has already matched or superceded Gran Turismo in most areas, damage, online, mechanical and livery customisation, track list, car list (Porsche, Ferrari, less filler, more quality), engine sounds etc. Everyone's looking at PD to see what they deliver, they have yet to top Forza 2, nevermind Forza 3.
http://www.insidesimracing.tv/
i don't want to insult anyone's fragile biasism towards any platform or game series but if GT series haven't happened in 98 we would probably still be racing only racecars on racetracks without any coherent structure. also, without many gameplay assets of gt series genre would still be dull as whiteboard. so if pd would pack theirs bags, you can bet that evolution would be pretty much sustained. not to even mention that games such as segagt, enthusia and forza would never exist in their form if there was no gt. so you can pretty much call yourself either ignorant, missinformed or deliberately biased - conclusion remains the same. sorry for capitalisation and formatting, im writing this on web browser of my obscure and overpaid bluray player tha eventually lets me to play games from time to time .
I love how some people think the O.G.'s are the only people with brains. If they thought of these things, what makes you think it's impossible for anyone else to? Who's really the ignorant one here?
All I can say is thank goodness Sony aren't as complacent as some of those around here., i.e. E3's 'only' a trade show. It's a trade show that will define the year ahead and drive the media agenda until Christmas, and the reason why Sony has so many suprise titles under wraps.That makes as much sense as saying the Honda Civic competes with the Lexus LS and the Cadillac CTS. Yes, they are all cars, yes the Civic sells far better than the LS and CTS, but the Civic has a VERY different target market... and once again, evidence and facts have already been brought to your attention that bare that out.
As for everything else you have said, it's pretty much been covered already.
Look, just as you have the right to express your opinion, you also have the right to be proven wrong, and considering that facts, and not just personal subjective opinions, have already been brought to your attention that don't support your opinion, I suspect is why some may feel you are simply trying continue to spread myths and misinformation.
Now when I first responded to your initial comment I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you were perhaps simply a victim of someone else's misleading information (as Lord knows there's plenty of it to be found) and only sharing what you thought was true... but even though facts that fairly clearly show that much of what you claimed was true isn't, you apparently aren't changing your tune in the least... which now makes me feel like rather than being a victim of misinformation, you are one of the culprits.![]()
i don't want to insult anyone's fragile biasism towards any platform or game series but if GT series haven't happened in 98 we would probably still be racing only racecars on racetracks without any coherent structure. also, without many gameplay assets of gt series genre would still be dull as whiteboard. so if pd would pack theirs bags, you can bet that evolution would be pretty much sustained. not to even mention that games such as segagt, enthusia and forza would never exist in their form if there was no gt. so you can pretty much call yourself either ignorant, missinformed or deliberately biased - conclusion remains the same. sorry for capitalisation and formatting, im writing this on web browser of my obscure and overpaid bluray player tha eventually lets me to play games from time to time .