ROAD_DOGG33J
Premium
- 14,272
- IL, USA
- holyc0w1
- holyc0w
.999 repeating = 1. It does, but it doesn't.
The 'rona.
Seriously though, it annoys the heck out of me too.
Also, isn't it a proper noun? I always capitalize it. As bolded in your quote.
APcoronaviruses
A family of viruses, some of which cause disease in people and animals, named for crownlike spikes on their surfaces.
The viruses can cause the common cold or more severe diseases such as SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome) and COVID-19, the latter of which first appeared in late 2019 in Wuhan, China.
As of March 2020, referring to simply the coronavirus is acceptable on first reference in stories about COVID-19. While the phrasing incorrectly implies there is only one coronavirus, it is clear in this context. Also acceptable on first reference: the new coronavirus; the new virus; COVID-19.
In stories, do not refer simply to coronavirus without the article the. Not: She is concerned about coronavirus. Omitting the is acceptable in headlines and in uses such as: He said coronavirus concerns are increasing.
Passages and stories focusing on the science of the disease require sharper distinctions.
COVID-19, which stands for coronavirus disease 2019, is caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2. When referring specifically to the virus, the COVID-19 virus and the virus that causes COVID-19 are acceptable. But, because COVID-19 is the name of the disease, not the virus, it is not accurate to write a new virus called COVID-19.
SARS is acceptable on first reference for the disease first identified in Asia in 2003. Spell out severe acute respiratory syndrome later in the story.
MERS is acceptable on first reference. Spell out Middle East respiratory syndrome later in the story.
Is it okay to substitute fat with "curvy"? How about "husky", "tubby" or "chunky"? Is "crippled" an acceptable alternative to the latter? Why/not?It's not OK to call a fat person fat but it's OK to call a disabled person disabled.
It's not OK to call a fat person fat but it's OK to call a disabled person disabled.
People who think making a change in life is easy for someone who is struggling. The phrase I absolutely hate is "If you don't like your ______, why don't you just _____."
I've been seeing this be even more prevent with the virus and people mocking those essential workers in something like the food industry or auto industry for complaining about not being paid enough to risk their lives. Just to hear people say "if you don't like the job, just quit and find another one." It's not as easy as you think to find a job.... Or same goes for my current situation of absolutely hating my apartment neighbors and all I keep getting told is that I should "just" move. But the cost of living in Southern Maine isn't cheap and living up north, despite being cheaper, doesn't really mean much if you add to the factor of the cost of commuting from farther away. (And risks)
It's about as bad as someone with depression being told to "just cheer up," as if everyone's the same and can just make an immediate change.
I feel like I've lost knowledge reading this post. But yes, you are correct.The thing that absolutely annoys the heck for me is to hear journalist on TV or radio saying this:
"so and so is/was traveling at high rate of speed..."
High rate of speed?!!
The journalists just love to use that term! They will use it anytime they have the chance... the will use it ignorantly too.
You either say:
1) the car was traveling at high speed
OR
2) the car was accelerating rapidly/excessively
High rate of speed is the equivalent of accelerating rapidly...
Why can't they just say accelerating rapidly?
No, no, the journalist want to sound scientific, and in doing so, they are wrong...
Using "high rate of speed" is not doing them any good. In fact, if they use "high rate of speed", clearly it makes them sound very stupid to the educated people.
At this point, any journalist using "high rate of speed" is essentially a parrot, repeating ignorantly what they dont know.
One of my physics teachers pointed it out to us a few decades ago, and ever since that day, every single time i heard "high rate of speed", i just wanted to jump into the tv and radio and strangle the ignorant.
Please let your fellow journalist family and friends know... stop this madness.
and please dont use "high rate of acceleration" that's even more stupid.
Acceleration is the increasing rate of speed.
Saying "high rate of speed" is essentially saying "high acceleration", so why not use that term to make it simple, and you wont sound like a dimwit anymore.
I feel like I've lost knowledge reading this post. But yes, you are correct.
Also though, when journalist are quoting an officer or spokesperson for something of this nature, it's not their fault. It's the officer's fault. But yes before you say anything, the journalist should use the soundbite of the officer or just omit the quote when reporting on the story.
Let's assume I'm accelerating at 12ft/s/s (about 0.38G), then I press the bang pedal harder and increase that to 24ft/s/s (about 0.75G).And please dont use "high rate of acceleration" that's even more stupid.
Also makes me wonder what "low rate of speed" means...?Let's assume I'm accelerating at 12ft/s/s (about 0.38G), then I press the bang pedal harder and increase that to 24ft/s/s (about 0.75G).
How would you describe that process in any other terms than me increasing the rate at which I am accelerating?
Let's assume I'm accelerating at 12ft/s/s (about 0.38G), then I press the bang pedal harder and increase that to 24ft/s/s (about 0.75G).
How would you describe that process in any other terms than me increasing the rate at which I am accelerating?
I road test cars. Comparative acceleration rates are useful.It is technically correct in the stated situation, but whoever bother using that term must be bored out of their mind....
Also makes me wonder what "low rate of speed" means...?
I road test cars. Comparative acceleration rates are useful.
How do you come to the conclusion that one is bored when all you have to go by is discussion not pertaining to being bored? Is the willingness to engage in discussion with others indicative of boredom?PS : I would like to be as bored as you are
How do you come to the conclusion that one is bored when all you have to go by is discussion not pertaining to being bored? Is the willingness to engage in discussion with others indicative of boredom?
News reporters are generally a victim of their profession in that they often have to fill a time describing things they know nothing about. So no matter what, they end up sounding clueless since they usually are, depending on the subject. The more you as a viewer know about a subject being reported, the more painfully apparent this effect is.
On a related note, this has me thinking of a time my neighbor gave us a carpet and told us how it wasn't cheap, albeit in a rather confusing manner. She told us "It was not inexpensive". Okay, maybe it's just me, but it threw me off, I had a difficult time processing this due to how it was worded and I ended up misunderstanding it as a result. She could've just said "It was not cheap" and not only does it have the same meaning, but it's far easier to understand. I don't know why she didn't just say that instead.
I have no doubt I have had other instances like this in my life, but this is the only one that comes to mind right now.
I'm genuinely curious to see what homeforsummer has to say about this because if I recall correctly, he is a journalist. (correct me if I'm wrong)
🤬 fast.I'm genuinely curious to see what homeforsummer has to say about this because if I recall correctly, he is a journalist. (correct me if I'm wrong)
Fixed it for you🤬 fast rate of speed.
I could not fail to disagree with you less.On a related note, this has me thinking of a time my neighbor gave us a carpet and told us how it wasn't cheap, albeit in a rather confusing manner. She told us "It was not inexpensive". Okay, maybe it's just me, but it threw me off, I had a difficult time processing this due to how it was worded and I ended up misunderstanding it as a result. She could've just said "It was not cheap" and not only does it have the same meaning, but it's far easier to understand. I don't know why she didn't just say that instead.
I have no doubt I have had other instances like this in my life, but this is the only one that comes to mind right now.
Could be, but I still feel she was being needlessly complex with her wording.To me it seems like a polite way to infer that the carpet was expensive but without sounding snobby.
I see what you did there.I could not fail to disagree with you less.