Rotary Junkie
Premium
- 9,810
- Canton, MI
- RJs_RX-7
Nah, multiply by .62 to get it exact.
Nah, multiply by .62 to get it exact.
My garage is now full of cars with nicely rounded mileages, and when switching between mph and kmh I noticed that;
15,000 miles = 24,000 km and,
24,000 miles = 38,400 km exactly.
So PD are using 1 mile = 1.6 km and/or 1 km = 0.625 miles for their conversion factors.
The most accurate real-world conversion you can reasonably expect to use is that 1 mile equals 1.609344 kilometres.speedemon08multiply it by 5 and divide by 8 to get a rough calculation, and thats about 302 mph.
Nah, multiply by .62 to get it exact.
I am still not entirely happy with taking speeds in kilometres per hour and then simply converting them. Who knows, with all the odd glitches GT4 has in it, perhaps the speed is calculated differently to distance, or - more likely - speed is calculated more accurately for Max Speed Test runs. This means that, despite the knowledge of the overall distance conversion rates, we still can't accept proof in kilometres per hour for the Leaderboard: as those who've been around a bit will tell you, in a close speed battle a couple of hundredths can make the difference between being top and not.
Did you, er, read my post at #6903?gt4 addictthe best conversion is:
km/h-mph: multiply by 0.6214
mph-km'h: divide by 0.6214
for example, 250km/h=155.35mph and just to check, 155.35/0.6214=250. so there you go, the proper formula.
this means that to be a fully-fledged member of club 300 you need to have a speed of at least 482.78km/h.
therefore, Street Racer 77 just scrapes in with 300.7576mph. congrats!
hope this helps guys and good luck reaching that magic number
Did you, er, read my post at #6903?
It supplies not only a more accurate conversion method but also a very good reason for not using it on GT4-output speeds.
Thanks for that, Car-less, that little issue is news to me too - makes me feel somewhat more comfortable with my decision though
DE
How can you possibly claim that your conversion rate is 'almost exactly' right, when you can't even get it to work both ways? I have to wonder why you don't simply divide by a constant to go one way, and then multiply by it to go the other.speedemon08the conversion rate is almost exacly the formula i said, as it works on the mph to kmh conversion, but is slightly out on the kmh to mph conversion.![]()
I thought of that. The issue is that you end up with a constant that works exactly for one particular speed, but may not be exactly accurate for others. It only takes one infinitesimal decimal place to cause rounding to work incorrectly when converting the speed, thus our constant must be perfectly accurate. You have, however, proven that the speed conversion is done differently to the car odometer conversion.mafia_boyI think what we need to do is have someone do a 300+ run in any car, then convert to km/h by changing the units marker in options. Then do vice versa by doing the run in km/h then converting to mph. If there is any discrepency it will be found out this way by this method in conjunction with using the calculation.
For example, I ran a 3000GT on max speed today. Got a km/h speed of 518.19km/h, when I used the units change in options, it came up at 322.00mph. Going from this method along with using DE's calculation of 1.609344 it wound up with 518.21km/h, which is just off the mark. HOWEVER, using the tried and universally accepted figure of 1.6093 with no other decimal points put me SPOT ON THE MARK!! 322.00mph = 518.1946km/h. Round that down (under .1950) and it becomes 518.19km/h!! SUCCESS.
Other way around of 518.19km/h divided by 1.6093 = 321.9971mph, rounded up (over .9950) it becomes 322.00mph.
PROBLEMO SOLVE-O!!
Hi there ty00123, that's a good starting speed. Did you read and follow all of the rules outlined in Post #1 when doing it?
LeonidaeHmm.. btw, is the 6.2 mile 300ZX still the "weakest" roadgoing car to get into 300mph? AFAIK, it had 888bhp while I was doing those runs for a year, over and over and over again.. if there's other car that has less power and achieved 300mph+, let me know.
Can't even get 800bhp out of that baby, I believe it would've been around the 770 mark. Shame it had to be an R33, eh mate?Leaderboard230 tyr112587 Nissan Skyline GT-R33 V-Spec 316.63 15/08/2006 Road
Thanks for that, ty00123 - is there some sort of abbreviation I can use for you- you're now on the Leaderboard. Welcome, once again, to the Club
![]()
I think what we need to do is have someone do a 300+ run in any car, then convert to km/h by changing the units marker in options. Then do vice versa by doing the run in km/h then converting to mph. If there is any discrepency it will be found out this way by this method in conjunction with using the calculation.
For example, I ran a 3000GT on max speed today. Got a km/h speed of 518.19km/h, when I used the units change in options, it came up at 322.00mph. Going from this method along with using DE's calculation of 1.609344 it wound up with 518.21km/h, which is just off the mark. HOWEVER, using the tried and universally accepted figure of 1.6093 with no other decimal points put me SPOT ON THE MARK!! 322.00mph = 518.1946km/h. Round that down (under .1950) and it becomes 518.19km/h!! SUCCESS.
Other way around of 518.19km/h divided by 1.6093 = 321.9971mph, rounded up (over .9950) it becomes 322.00mph.
PROBLEMO SOLVE-O!!
*added bit* Still want someone else to do the run to double check if I'm right or not.![]()
I thought of that. The issue is that you end up with a constant that works exactly for one particular speed, but may not be exactly accurate for others. It only takes one infinitesimal decimal place to cause rounding to work incorrectly when converting the speed, thus our constant must be perfectly accurate. You have, however, proven that the speed conversion is done differently to the car odometer conversion.
Quite apart from that, this is a Club for people who've reached speeds of over 300 miles per hour. "The 482.8032kph Club" doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
DE
Hmm.. btw, is the 6.2 mile 300ZX still the "weakest" roadgoing car to get into 300mph? AFAIK, it had 888bhp while I was doing those runs for a year, over and over and over again..if there's other car that has less power and achieved 300mph+, let me know.
Leaderboard429 MasterStorm Mitsubishi FTO Super Tourer 301.63 01/07/2006 Racing
In all honesty, I've only had GT4 for about a month, so this is my first "major ahievement", if you will.Alright, I'll put it in bold so people know I haven't missed some letters out of 'tyre' or whatever
No problem, seems that's what I'm here for these days! It's nice to see someone genuinely glad to be here, too
![]()
Figured as much; just wanted to make sure.If you make a new speed, I'd prefer you make a new post - unless, of course, the most recent post is one of your own - so that I'm guaranteed to notice it! Apart from that, when this thread's moving at a high pace, backtracking to find your original post could get a bit time-consuming. Anyway, putting it in a new post means you get everyone else's attention and, sometimes, congratulations![]()
Another thing I had kinda figured just from looking at the Leaderboard; I had 3 speeds that were slower than the one I had posted.Answering another question I misread your post to mean, just in case anyone else new is wondering- to avoid massive amounts of speeds that are sometimes very similar, each member is 'allocated' one slot for each car. So, if you post a speed in a new car, that's in a new entry on the Leaderboard, to allow people to hold speeds and records in multiple cars. However, if you post a faster speed in a car you've already used, your existing entry will be replaced. After all, there's no need for a several-thousand-entry Leaderboard showing everyone how slow you used to be, is there?![]()
All I can say is "Wow". I knew there were a lot of people, but I had no idea it went this deep.Random statistic for the moment: as things stand now, if all of our drivers had used all of the cars proven to be capable of 300mph, the Leaderboard would have 9,940 entries
DE
I'm pretty sure the weakest car, full stop, is the Mitsubishi FTO Super Touring Car - with six hundred and something horsepower, if I recall correctly.
Anyone have a precise figure for that car?
DE
Yeah, but if it's the same car, it would only show the best with that car. Ok Speedemon?