- 5,588
- Dahlonega, GA
- ryzno
@huskeR32 tree'd me...You make a good point how does "they" work in other languages ?
@huskeR32 tree'd me...You make a good point how does "they" work in other languages ?
@huskeR32 tree'd me...
In some languages there is no seperate word for "gender" (as in identity). They use sex and gender interchangebly. I am curious if other languages make that difference though.
On that bombshell, I speak Spanish too, not perfect but, I'd be fine if I went to Mexico. That said, they have specific words depending on if you are talking to a man or woman/boy or girl.
I'm not fluent in Spanish, but I know some. "Ellas" = they/them if you're referring to a woman, or a group that's entirely women. "Ellos" = they/them if you're referring to a man, or a group that has at least one male member.
So, the language already dictates that "ellos" can serve a neutral purpose, even though it's the "masculine" version of the word. Perhaps non-binary folks in Spanish-speaking languages would just utilize that already extant flexibility?
French has an ungendered "they" (on) in addition to gendered they (ils/elles), so it's do-able.
I am curious if a native speaker agrees with that. In dutch "hun" (they) is plural. As far as I am aware isnt used for individuals.
I am just starting trying to understand non-binary as a gender, but have difficulty understanding. Because as far as I know sex defines your biology and sexuality defines your sexual preference.
What is the main difference in feeling as both genders vs no-gender?
Perhaps your confusion is stemming from trying to incorporate sex and preference into what gender is?
I'm not sure there is much of a distinction here. Either way, a person saying that they're neither or that they're both are probably trying to communicate the same thing - that they don't feel like the traditional, rigid, male-or-female dichotomy accurately describes them.
I...I don't know.Perhaps it's just how I see sexuality ('the opposite', 'the same', 'either', or 'neither' / hetero, homo, bi, A-). If I state myself as a heterosexual male (sexuality - gender), it's simple to understand my partner would not be a homosexual male or female (for instance). I was wondering if stating that a non-binary person was either a heterosexual (opposite) or homosexual (same) undermined their gender since it assumes one state in order for them to be attracted to the same or opposite, therefore leaving bisexual or Asexual as the only two 'safe' options (if we're applying labels)
Not trying to pick fault, just curious.
Interesting article.
https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5428701
There is a good reason for a passport (and other official identity documents) to remain a reflection of your physiological gender rather than your psychological one. It's so that you can be identified when you cannot identify yourself - such as when you are unconscious and require appropriate medical treatment for your own medical history, or dead and your loved ones want to bury the right otherwise-unidentifiable remains.In the UK you literally can't get your passport changed to anything except for male or female.
In this context, gender is not a reflection of biology, and in no context is it a reflection of sexual preference. Gender is what you identify as.I am just starting trying to understand non-binary as a gender, but have difficulty understanding. Because as far as I know sex defines your biology and sexuality defines your sexual preference.
I know of intersex or androgany, but I have a lot of difficulty understanding non-binary. In my head it just feels like the question if I am ethnically chinese, but feel dutch and then deciding you are neither chinese and neither dutch, but end up as both. I would not understand the feelign of being neither.
If you feel both genders you feel that you have some parts of either identity. If you feel none then you do not have parts of either.What is the main difference in feeling as both genders vs no-gender?
No, that would be genderfluid. Non-binary is specifically someone who does not identify as either because they do not perceive gender as an exclusionary one-or-the-other thing.So non-binary person could be seen as both?
Not intrinsically (although they may identify as such) because intersex disorders and hermaphroditism (which are different things) are physiological not psychological. Gender in this context is what you identify as, not what your chromosomes say or what physiology they produce.Can a hermaphrodite (intersex) be seen as non-binary?
Thanks for the explanation. As you already pointed out, it doesnt help that the community themselves have trouble "labeling" yet some can find offence in mislabeling even when there is no malicious intent. Like within ethnic groups, slurs its kind of unanimous what is offensive and what not. Are there any definitive answers to the definion of LGBTQ+?
This is interesting thread for people from cultures where gender doesn't really exist, in every culture there are some expectations for males and females in society, but that's only expectation. English culture is trying to give label on something that can't be labeled because everybody is an individual.
There is a good reason for a passport (and other official identity documents) to remain a reflection of your physiological gender rather than your psychological one. It's so that you can be identified when you cannot identify yourself - such as when you are unconscious and require appropriate medical treatment for your own medical history, or dead and your loved ones want to bury the right otherwise-unidentifiable remains.
They've simply decided that the good reason isn't a good enough one to remain as it is.If this is the case then how do Argentina, Canada, Malta, New Zealand, Uruguay and some US states deal with this? All of them let you identify as non-binary on official documents including passports.
They've simply decided that the good reason isn't a good enough one to remain as it is.
My dad had a co-worker who was male, fully changed to female and ended up getting with a woman.For all I know, there are "male" trans individuals out there, those who were identified as female at birth, who are attracted to "female" trans individuals.
"on" (we/us) is plural though and not an individual. I dont think it is used as pronoun for an individual at all.
Le beurre est bon sur le pain.De rien.
The point was made that in many languages and cultures there is no "gender" (as in identity).
On that note, If I refuse to comply with established idea of man in society (chase pussy, make kids, work my ass off to pay mortgage) what gender should I choose from this list? And why do I need to label my identity?
It sounds like pre op counselling would only be considered conversion therapy if counsellors were also trying to convert the gender preference of the individual. I can't see where or why opponents of conversion therapy would be opposed to pre-op counselling.There is the counter-point, which is transgender regret stories, some of which end up in suicide. Is counselling someone to reconsider transgender therapies automatically conversion therapy? I'd hate to see that be the case. Seems like defining what is "conversion therapy" would be fraught with problems.
There is a good reason for a passport (and other official identity documents) to remain a reflection of your physiological gender rather than your psychological one. It's so that you can be identified when you cannot identify yourself - such as when you are unconscious and require appropriate medical treatment for your own medical history, or dead and your loved ones want to bury the right otherwise-unidentifiable remains.
In this context, gender is not a reflection of biology, and in no context is it a reflection of sexual preference. Gender is what you identify as.
Nationality is an interesting one, because your ethnicity is a matter of genetics and physiology (like chromosomal and physiological gender are), but your nationality is a matter of identity. This would be more like if there were only two possible nations on Earth and most people identified as one or the other (which matched their ethnicity), but some identified as the opposite, some as both equally, some as neither, and some as parts of one and parts of the other - and which may shift on a momentary basis.
If you feel both genders you feel that you have some parts of either identity. If you feel none then you do not have parts of either.
This reflects back to earlier points @Danoff made about gender stereotypes - how can one decide you have male and female identifiers without first deciding what makes males male and females female, and how can you do that without referring back to gender stereotypes?
No, that would be genderfluid. Non-binary is specifically someone who does not identify as either because they do not perceive gender as an exclusionary one-or-the-other thing.
Not intrinsically (although they may identify as such) because intersex disorders and hermaphroditism (which are different things) are physiological not psychological. Gender in this context is what you identify as, not what your chromosomes say or what physiology they produce.
This is why I rarely take offence if people use terminology that is considered rude, lots of people genuinely don't know what terms they should use and what is off limits.
.
Genderfluid, Non-binary, trans, queer etc. It is very confusing for me and very hard to classify and use correct pro-nouns.
I already noticed in your posts that you are very aware that ignorence does not equal malice. The problem there are some that do take offense. There is no mainstream way how someone like me can actually learn more. Even dictionaries and wikipedia has conlicting information.
It's universal... ish.The problem is all of the above is not universal and there is much contradictory information out there.
It's universal... ish.
In essence you should keep four terms in mind:
* Trans - across, or opposed
* Cis - alongside, or the same; not a wholly necessary term, but one frequently used
* Gender - psychological sexual identity
* Sex - physiological sexual characteristics
*And this leads back to a question @Danoff posed - and was called transphobic for posing - of how you can describe a gender identity in terms of maleness and femaleness without resorting to stereotypes of male and female behaviour.
We all know about those crotch sniffers, built into the door handles of all public restrooms, that detect the genitalia of wouldbe travelers and allow the door to be locked automatically if the genitalia detected doesn't correspond to the gender permitted to enter, but do you suppose one of those Gwyneth Paltrow vagina candles could be used to trick the system and allow someone with ill intent to get in? One wonders if that's why they sold out so quick.
But as I pointed out earlier in many languages and cultures there is no seperate word of gender as an identity.
The issue is that the adoption of the term "gender" to mean an identity as a distinction from "sex" to mean a physical characteristic is very much new - the terms are pretty much interchangeable, although "gender" means "sort, or kind" and "sex" means "division in two".
Post
I came to this thread because I misread the thread title as "Transgender Threat" and wanted to know more.Don't know why I came to this thread, but now I know there's a legal precedent for saying big ol' titties on GTP, and that's about all the information I'll be needing.
Thankee, and big ol' titties.
So, for instance, when a restaurant owner seek to hire people, what does the classified ad look like regarding waiter/waitress mention? And did this change over time?That's also true in English, it's common (if becoming unpopular) to talk about waiters and waitresses, actors and actresses, we have all kinds of gendered nouns despite having no actual gender system