Scaff
Moderator
- 29,815
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
Those naughty chaps at Top Gear have managed to get themselves in trouble again.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6324129.stm
So now the PC brigade have stomped in on this one, apparently the TG team must discuss the accident with serious faces on or its disrespectful. I would have thought that what constitutes disrespectful comments in regards to Hammond's accident could only be judged by Hammond himself. Given that the entire show is scripted I'm sure had he any objections he is more than able to voice them himself.
I did also love this comment "It just glamorised fast driving and gives the impression people can make a fully recovery from head injuries.", firstly I don't think is glamorised fast driving at all, it showed quite clearly that an accident at those speeds is very, very serious indeed; however its the second part that gets me. What is RH supposed to do? Pretend he did not make a fully recovery so it doesn't give the wrong impression. I get the feeling these people would have actually been happier had he died or not fully recovered, and that I find far more disrespectful than any of the comments made by the TG team.
The second set of complaints is quite typical of 'BRAKE', an organisation that is singularly obsessed with stating that speeding is the cause of all accidents. They seem to believe that footage of someone having a major accident in a 300mph+ jetcar is going to turn us all into speed-fuelled accidents waiting to happen. These are the same people that believe that we should all be forced to stick exactly to the speed limits no matter what, because driving around staring at my speedo to make sure I don't do 31mph in a 30 zone is far safer than doing 31mph and actually looking at the damn road.
Bloody lentil eating politically correct morons get my back right up.
Grrrrrrrrrr
Scaff
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6324129.stm
BBC NewsTop Gear insulting, says charity
The handling of Richard Hammond's return to Top Gear has been branded "insensitive" and "insulting" by a charity for people with brain injury.
Headway said it had been inundated with complaints particularly over comments made by presenter Jeremy Clarkson.
At the start of Sunday's show, Mr Clarkson asked Mr Hammond if he was mental, while James May offered him a tissue in case he started dribbling.
The BBC said the show was not intended to cause any offence.
It really was offensive and insulting to all those people living with brain injuries
Peter McCabe, of Headway
Headway chief executive Peter McCabe said: "This has created such anger among members of Headway. It really was offensive and insulting to all those people living with brain injuries.
"I think the whole way the show handled the issue was wrong. They should not have shown the crash.
"It just glamorised fast driving and gives the impression people can make a fully recovery from head injuries.
"That is not always the case."
Complaints
The charity said it had received 50 complaints via the telephone helpline and through email from members and has now announced it will be making a complaint about the programme.
Mr Hammond, 37, was left fighting for his life in September following the crash in when his jet-powered car came off a runway near York at 280mph.
The BBC Two show featured footage of the crash.
A BBC spokesman said: "Top Gear's audience is familiar with the irreverent tone of the programme and this was typical of the type of exchanges that take place between the presenters. It was certainly not intended to cause any offence.
"The item showing Richard's crash could not have been a clearer illustration of the dangers and excitements of speed."
The programme has also fallen foul of Brake, the national road safety charity.
It said it was "shocked and appalled" by Mr Clarkson's comment that "speed kills" while pointing at Mr Hammond following clips of the crash.
Jools Townsend, from the charity, said: "Clarkson's comment was highly irresponsible and offensive to anyone who has been bereaved or injured at the hands of a speeding driver.
"A shockingly disproportionate number of young male drivers are dying on our roads and it is highly irresponsible for the BBC to allow Top Gear, with its target audience of young males, to openly make light the deadly act of speeding."
So now the PC brigade have stomped in on this one, apparently the TG team must discuss the accident with serious faces on or its disrespectful. I would have thought that what constitutes disrespectful comments in regards to Hammond's accident could only be judged by Hammond himself. Given that the entire show is scripted I'm sure had he any objections he is more than able to voice them himself.
I did also love this comment "It just glamorised fast driving and gives the impression people can make a fully recovery from head injuries.", firstly I don't think is glamorised fast driving at all, it showed quite clearly that an accident at those speeds is very, very serious indeed; however its the second part that gets me. What is RH supposed to do? Pretend he did not make a fully recovery so it doesn't give the wrong impression. I get the feeling these people would have actually been happier had he died or not fully recovered, and that I find far more disrespectful than any of the comments made by the TG team.
The second set of complaints is quite typical of 'BRAKE', an organisation that is singularly obsessed with stating that speeding is the cause of all accidents. They seem to believe that footage of someone having a major accident in a 300mph+ jetcar is going to turn us all into speed-fuelled accidents waiting to happen. These are the same people that believe that we should all be forced to stick exactly to the speed limits no matter what, because driving around staring at my speedo to make sure I don't do 31mph in a 30 zone is far safer than doing 31mph and actually looking at the damn road.
Bloody lentil eating politically correct morons get my back right up.
Grrrrrrrrrr
Scaff