HAHA! I bet they took that from us
![LOL :lol: :lol:](/wp-content/themes/gtp16/images/smilies/lol.svg?v=3)
Yes. Source please.
Could be, I have no idea, nor do I really care. They could have taken it from any site that includes a forum on GT6 where speculation runs rampant, including GTPlanet and many others, or they may have been quoting Mr Yamauchi directly. It should be obvious to most intelligent racers and even a few gAmeRz that official info is and always has been in short supply re GT. I simply provided it because that's where I found it.
I know many impatient gAmeRz think the slave-mentat-elves are toiling away 24/7/365 all year long to support their "substantial" (not) $60 investment, but from mid Dec til the first week of January, things tend to come to a crawl in many businesses, especially where people tend to work really long hours like in programming. I know I didn't get very much done this past week or so for the code I develop and maintain. Granted, I normally work 16+ hour days, so I have no qualms about taking the time, regardless of anyone's complaints. Emergencies are one thing, but this isn't an emergency. My employer can always choose to fire me, but they will be hard pressed to find someone as intimate with the code or as willing to drop everything when they have an issue or a new feature they want added, at the price they pay me.
I have no doubts that PD will deliver. "When?" is a question that leads to speculation until an official announcement is made. That much should be apparent without resorting to mydogbigger me-too-isms and "Like I said it firsts".
Yes LVracerGT, much as I'd like to see the missing content added, any substantial bugs probably ought to be shaken out first. Of course, a complete shake-out may be problematic, since some aren't obvious bugs (for instance, the online bonus issue that some are reporting) and some may simply be difficult to isolate, but I do agree with the sentiment. It's how I conduct my work and how I hope to see companies conduct theirs as well. Not exactly "hoping" they do so, but it seems to me a responsible way to address things.
Having said that, iff there's content they have completed which is ready for incorporation, I don't see anything wrong with a two-pronged attack, ie, release the content and continue to squash bugs. I can't why they would hold up release of material until they fix every single issue. That wouldn't be in anyone's best interest (IMHO)