It doesn't affect me if other people have more money, and it doesn't really bother me how they got it. But it does affect me when the online portion is literally plugged up with people glitching.
I have to admit, I didn't get to use online during the SS7 glitch, but I don't see what's so bad about it. A room made for racing faced much less competition if the majority of rooms were SS7. It should have been easier for those seeking a race to gather. Even before 1.07 a good portion of rooms were SS7 for free run, trade, or drag. 99% of time, those were as good as blanks to me along with rooms on oval tracks, SRF, no restrictions etc. People will do what they want to do. While finding a race may, perhaps, have been less convenient, I'm sure it wasn't even close to impossible. But again, I wasn't there.
I will say though, that 1.08 might actually be justified, if only because it tamed online mode. Though there are other ways that the situation could have been handled without the needless removal of the SS7 glitch.
I never said it was perfect, I said there was an IMO obvious intention there, and used properly its not utterly useless. It still does show where someone is at in the game. As well you need to be somewhat decent at the game to win the X1 unless you b-spec it (which yes I agree is dumb but I guess they needed a big incentive) you can't just overpower that challenge nor FGT. They should have had more regulations on some races, thats just a flaw in the game nothing you can do about it.
The FGT challenge doesn't matter. Even with the SS7 glitch, duping, or anything, you can only win it if you're better than the AI. This has never changed. You can get to level 40 the "right" way by playing the Sunday Cup (or more realistically grinding Indy in the X1 [that can be obtained in B-Spec or from a friend]). No one needs to beat the FGT challenge in GT5, and no one can take credit for it without actually doing it. Same for the other races.
And there is far from nothing that can be done about the game. If the AI was good enough to care about, I'd probably be with people asking for suggested race restrictions. It's something that GT has always lacked, and one of many things that makes it feel primitive and poorly thought out. Sure, some races like Super GT make it easy to pick a theoretically competitive car, but it's harder in more open races. Point is, fans can and should ask for what they want. And as long as it doesn't negatively effect others, I think anything is a reasonable request.
My point is they put out a product that fits into certain parameters. A lot of people expect it to be something different. Meanwhile there are other games out there that will do what they want and have all the cars they could ever want and more (iRacing, GTR, others... yes on the PC but if you really care then who cares what they are on). I just don't get it. If I need a product to do a certain thing I don't buy one that doesn't and then bitch about it afterwards, I buy what does what I want.
I bought GT5 because it has what I want. It's just that the game makes it difficult to get there. Also consider that PD has been up to a bit of faulty marketing. Of all the scarce meaningful interviews with Kaz I remember before release, the most important to me was one where he said something like "players are different today, they don't have time to unlock stuff". It made it sound like GT was going in a good direction. Same for GT5P's promise of unlocking cars in GT5. PD axed both without warning. What am I to do if I can't even trust what they said?
I guess at this point, it's obvious that we disagree on what's harmless and what's not. But I would only suggest a change or exploit a feature if I deem it harmless. I am completely open to the ideas that other people want to play a game in some other way, and I take that into consideration when I post my thoughts. I really do think that PD can please everyone, or at least a very large majority. But they don't even try, and that is truly frustrating.
Yes its stopped now that trading has been blocked, but up until now anyone and everyone had one. The point of the game was it was supposed to be a car few had and they had to earn over time. That is gone now, at least until a predominant number of those who duped it give up on the game.
As someone who "earned" an X1, I'm glad that everyone had one. It made finding a race easier. If I had one and no one else did, what would do with it? It would be useless. I guess others disagree though. The level system wasn't going to do me any good at all in finding a good race, and like I said, even level zeros can get the X1. The car was never meant to be exclusive. Ever. Maybe the carbon, but certainly not the regular model.
My focus is mainly on online play, and the economy of the game, and the rarity of cars. All are/were affected by it. You are missing that it DOES affect everyone, and IMO it would have been more fun if it were like real life, cars were rare, money was limited etc. It could have been like that and thats how it was intended. Unfortunatelynow that is gone.
Car rarity doesn't work in GT5 as is. There are infinite cars, there is infinite money. Getting one car isn't actually that bad, unless the UCD hates you. Even then PD allowed you to get around it with gifting and the OCD. What PD did was make it hard to have a large collection, for whatever reason. In an "as intended" GT5, Mark IV's would probably be fairly common online. What would have been uncommon: simultaneous owners of the Mark IV, 330, and 2J. I think all the other expensive cars are actually obtainable via offline racing. "Everyone" would have at least one. Heck, I've done 30% of the game, got the Jaguar XJ13 without even aiming for it because I was grinding.
But just because YOU don't like how it works or YOU feel that people should just get enjoyment resting on their A-Spec laurels, doesn't make it right.
Indeed. If one likes something, it doesn't make it right.
Maybe, for once and for all, the exploiters and cheaters can take this as a sign that PD (you know, they guys that MAKE the game) don't want you to cheat, don't want you to play the game 'any way you feel like it' and don't want you to exhaust the game in a few months. It's going to be several YEARS before the next one comes out, and they want you to have something left to do in a year or two's time...
PD has never
supported exploiting, this is obvious. I don't care, because A-Spec is garbage. They also pulled features from the game that were advertised without warning, and they don't communicate well with fans. I've found a better way to play, and I'll keep playing that way so long as it doesn't stop other people from playing their own way. If I'm doing no harm, I'm doing nothing wrong.
And for the xth time, if they want me to play a long time and have things to do in two years, then they shouldn't bother me, because GT5 lasts longer my way.
Then, the next time you feel like flaming someone for pointing out that you are 'cheating' or exploiting the game, you can simply flame PD and Kaz... and give us a rest for a while.
That makes no sense. If you personally go on about how someone is cheating even though they aren't, they have every right to argue with you.