- 40,764
No, not "some models." Every single car Acura sells right now (and the majority of the ones they've sold in the past decade), including one that will almost certainly come to GT7 fairly soon, meaning:And yes i get it that there are some models there are not released for the japanese market
This is false.but still no need to implement them because one where yelling at PD for it.
Because that's a standard you are applying for what constitutes a "different brand." Until 2021 when it was partially divested Bugatti's role in VAG was no different from Acura's in relation to Honda. It absolutely would not exist without Volkswagen; or the Volkswagen engineers that built the brand up with derivatives of Volkswagen powertrains on behalf of the Volkswagen then-chairman's specific engineering demands and then chose a nameplate to put on it after work had already started. Bugatti as a brand was so irrelevant to what Volkwagen was already working on that they only bought the brand after they found out that BMW was going to steal the Rolls Royce name out from under them for a small fraction what Volkswagen paid when Volkwagen thought they were buying it; and Piech had Volkwagen look to see if Bugatti's trademark was available out of spite against BMW. VW likely originally intended the car to be a Bentley or a Rolls when they thought they were buying both. So rushed was VW's initial ramp up of Bugatti that the first concept cars were tweaked versions of a car that the Italian Bugatti had built 5 years prior.And why you came up with bugatti?
So why is Acura (who builds and designs their own cars for their own market as well as doing the same for their halo car to be sold worldwide on behalf of their parent company) held to a different standard for being a "different" brand?
Last edited: