Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 964,365 views
Not fair. I want all of them except that Mitsubishi. Maybe the Nissan GT-R is at the third spot because I can't have one with LHD.
 
Last edited:
Mitsubishi. I love all the 90s tech. Twin turbo V6, AWD, four wheel steer, active aero, electronic suspension, probably a pager, too.
 
1973 Mitsubishi Lancer 1600 GSR
249351.jpg


1973 Nissan Skyline 2000 GT-R
image01.jpg


1970 Toyota 2000GT
7d356ff8-toyota-2000gt-1.jpg


1972 Mazda Cosmo Sport
20cf453c4ad1391a70ef304ede5b838e28db3786.jpg
 
Jist ton play some catch up.

Rx7

Cosmo, I have a soft spot for rotaries. But, if it came to actually getting them, the 2000GT, sell it, then buy the Cosmo, all gens of rx7 and maybe an rx3 wagon, and a house to store them all in...

And finally

FTO
That was easily the ugliest and most useless generation celica.

Pulsar probably because I began driving/modding cars in the hay day of Honda's with fart can mufflers, splotchy primer and broken evo body kits. That has literally ruined Honda cars for me.
 
I would be happy with a Mitsu 3000GT, or the Supra.... Or the RX7, or the NSX or the tuned R32 ;) (never really like the heavy look of the R34)

1973 Mitsubishi Lancer 1600 GSR
249351.jpg


1973 Nissan Skyline 2000 GT-R
image01.jpg


1970 Toyota 2000GT
7d356ff8-toyota-2000gt-1.jpg


1972 Mazda Cosmo Sport
20cf453c4ad1391a70ef304ede5b838e28db3786.jpg
Mazda COSMO !!!
BUT the 2000GT is gorgeous, especially in that green.







FTO vs Celica? FTO

Civic vs Pulsar? Pulsar.

Same: FTO and Pulsa...
 
Sorry, didn't mean to make this post
But, since I am here....
Would you rather

Mercury Marauder
1486274870163.jpg


Or

Chevy Impala SS

280px-94-96_Chevrolet_Impala_SS.jpg


The Marauder for me.
 
Last edited:
Back