I'm pretty sure he was aware of Lamborghini and Porsche all the way back in GT2 days, since they were mentioned multiple times in the car info sections in that game and there was one of each included (but hidden) in GT3 (including the Porsche 911 that Kaz himself owned at the time).@ CorvetteConquer: Kaz didn't really know about other car manufactures back when he started making GT, IIRC. He just met up with manufacturers, saw the cars for one day, and that was it. Now that the community has told him about Porsches and how he ironically OWNS two, I think he'll be adding some more cars into GT6.
CorvetteConquerThat's a loaded statement! Where did you ever hear/read this?
Kaz knows about manufacturers; after all, he's a huge car enthusiast.
ToronadoI'm pretty sure he was aware of Lamborghini and Porsche all the way back in GT2 days, since they were mentioned multiple times in the car info sections in that game and there was one of each included (but hidden) in GT3 (including the Porsche 911 that Kaz himself owned at the time).
http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=26274
That's the article where he was interviewed about his and Gran Turismo's beginnings.
I personally believe we will see a copy and paste of GT5, having 100+ skylines, miatas, Fairladiys...etc boring tracks, slow repetitive AI. The problem is GT has no competition on this platform, if Forza came to Sony Kaz would be filing for bankruptcy, if GT6 is the same as GT5 i'm not going to waste money on the game
The arrogance that was evident in 'Beyond the Apex' especially ' ... I want everything to be perfect' has to go.
You can say that about any game this gen being copy and paste. Well except maybe Heavy Rain.
And holy crap have people turned on PD pretty quick.
For me, the elimination of the 'duping' exploit was the straw the broke the camel's back. For a game that was devoid of any life in terms of racing, to go and curtail the only thing that made it marginally enjoyable (the collection of cars) it was a massive slap on the face.
Why? That's how the guy operates. Would you rather have him say everything has to be "ok"?
Never really understood the criticism for Kaz's Perfectionism streak. Yeah it's detrimental to scheduling, but at least he's got passion for his work. Steve Jobs had one too but yet the yuppies would spread their butt cheeks for him....
Why? That's how the guy operates. Would you rather have him say everything has to be "ok"?
Never really understood the criticism for Kaz's Perfectionism streak. Yeah it's detrimental to scheduling, but at least he's got passion for his work. Steve Jobs had one too but yet the yuppies would spread their butt cheeks for him....
It's not at all abnormal for a series to be strong, weaken, and then eventually fizzle out. Thus is life. Thus is gaming.
GT5 is clearly a low point in the series, if not the lowest. GT6 has a lot of pressure on its back. I can't imagine the number of "new comers" that took a risk on GT5 and were sorely disappointed. Many of the most proud and dedicated fans are those that have been around since '98, when GT arrived and re-defined racing games. But that was 1998. I don't think GT5 re-defined anything. I mean, it looked good over all (premium cars and new tracks), but that's it.
1. Online isn't new and exciting. It's very cumbersome. The open lobby requires much work.
2. Customization for a 2010 game was beyond laughable. Hey, paint your rims and body. Now leave! Oh, here's one wing option, too.
3. A-Spec mode was small, inconsistent and lacking many racing disciplines (not even one rally race?. You're kidding me, Kaz)
4. Standard manufacturers from all regions that should have had premium models (Where's the premium Bugatti, Chrysler, Cadillac, Plymouth, Buick, Saleen, Pontiac, RUF and Bentley and Holden models?)
5. Very few new manufacturers added. Where is Koenigsegg? Gumpert? Ariel? SSC? Opel? De Tomaso? Fisker? This is the best selling racing series. Come on now!
6. A.I. is terrible. Enough said, really. It needs serious work (only a few employees even work on A.I. according to the credits).
Lastly, we have to be sure not to just buy GT just because it's GT. That, for me, is a major flaw in our judgement. I, for one, will be much more cautious when considering buying GT6 for 60 dollars. It has to impress. I do wish PD luck.
I know this rant was tough, but I definitely want to see the series thrive again. We'll see.
Completely agree, especially the part in bold. After spending on Prologue and GT5, I feel like I've been duped (pardon the pun). But equally sadly, there isn't a true competitor to GT on the PS3. NFS and Burnout are all well and good I guess, but not serious enough. F1 and Dirt, too specialised. GRID was awesome but the direction the 2nd one is taking is disappointing and Shift 2? Let's not go there.
For a long time I was astounded how bad football (soccer) games were. And then FIFA 10 hit. I just think it's too late in the PS3's life span for a good all-round package racing game to arrive.
Project CARS my friend, Project CARS. Look it up, be amazed, sit back and wait for mid 2013.
Could it be that Kaz wants to add too much to the game itself?
I mean if he wanted a further 2 years to complete GT5 what does that say about the next game?
I believe his goals could be accomplished if the next game was on the PS3 as they would be using GT5 as a template on which to improve on. If the game was for the PS4 then I can see that the new equipment would only hamper the next GT's progress unless it was easier to program for than the PS3.
Another factor is does Kaz envision a fully finished game without DLC? If he had another 2 years on GT5 I could see the current DLC we've had up to now being part of the game, but would that mean they'd have plans for additional DLC ontop of that?
I have been totally distracted from GT5 just recently. F1 2012 in short. The physics are better in GT5 for sure, but I have come to the conclusion that although this is probably quite important, it does not make the game.
The thing about Gran Turismo is, it doesnt feel quite fresh enough. GT2 was GT1 done a little bit better.. GT4 was GT3 done a little bit better still. And if GT6 is GT5 with a little more spit and shine, I fear in response to the OP I will be very disappointed indeed.
Whilst I am very grateful for ongoing updates to the GT series, the feelings of freshness are few and far between. Let me just ask you guys how many years you've been driving round bloody Deep Forest Raceway!? In my opinion they need to drop the classic nature of GT.
This (in short) is why F1 has enamoured me.. All those brilliant new race tracks. 100's of twisty bits to learn then attack and perfect. The actual interpretation and physics of an F1 car are probably better in GT5, but as I said before, I really couldnt care less.
GT6 will no doubt grab my attention, but better UI's, better graphics, better physics, better utilisation of resources (with regard to better sounds, livery editors, night day cycles etc etc) should be GIVEN improvements over the last because of the better understanding and advancement of the hardware and software on which they are created. This in my opinion is chaff, not wheat.
GT6 should be new. Brand new! The only thing familiar about the next GT game, should be that sweet satisfaction you get from taming car against racetrack. And for me the only way to feel fresh is to be somewhere AND in something you've never experienced before.
Out of the box this is what GT6 should be.. ONLY new tracks, visceral sensations of speed and intensity, and a great community of online racers ready to get their wheels dirty
I couldnt ask for more, yet something tells me PD will try and give it. And it will be to the detriment of the few factors that make a driving game truely special.
GT6 even before its conception is on my 'to buy' list. Will I be disappointed, unfortunetely more than likely.
Out of the box this is what GT6 should be.. ONLY new tracks
JAHHAJThis in my opinion is the stupidest idea I've ever heard by all means put new tracks in but there's nothing wrong with just updating the old tracks.
PD have made millions from GT5, so in financial terms it's a success, I guess Sony & the shareholders are happy with the profits. I doubt PD genuinely care about anything else other than pursuing their own narrow minded & bizarrely Japanese nonsensical ideas (rabbit cars etc).
They're really great at making digital copies of real cars & tracks, making them look awesome in game. But when it comes to creating a realistic motor racing experience, they have all the imagination of a wet dish cloth! When I see all the creativity & innovation from GT Planet members, who organise & run online events, I wish PD would take notice & give us something similar.
GT6 will be more of the same; 'we love cars-patronising-fantasy-drivel' (with awesome looking cars & tracks of course). This time I'm expecting nothing, so that by contrast, I'll like whatever they do get right.
This in my opinion is the stupidest idea I've ever heard by all means put new tracks in but there's nothing wrong with just updating the old tracks.