- 35,488
- Downtown North Dakota
- Cy-Fi
Hence the ping of 4ms.My university's wireless.Funny thing is speedtest used one of the uni's own servers to perform the test! LOL
Hence the ping of 4ms.My university's wireless.Funny thing is speedtest used one of the uni's own servers to perform the test! LOL
![]()
My university's wireless.Funny thing is speedtest used one of the uni's own servers to perform the test! LOL
That is less than 50 miles away, not 50 kilometers away.
Apparently i'm less than 50km from Adelaide.![]()
That is less than 50 miles away, not 50 kilometers away.
You should really read the FAQ on speedtest.net. The speed is in Megabits and the distance is displayed in miles when you post a picture of the result. If you want to find your speed in Megabytes you divide the Megabit speed by 8 or 8000 if you want to find it in KB/s.
This is how I'm livin' (internet speed-wise)
http://[URL=http://www.speedtest.net][IMG]http://www.speedtest.net/result/480334576.png[/IMG][/URL]
I pay for 6 mb/s and get less than 4. Upload speed is terrible as well.
I get one of the popular "bundle" packages from my cable company.
I pay approximately $125 per month for about 120 channels, unlimited phone, and "6 mb/s" internet speed![]()
![]()
But I guess it could be worse, obviously.
My cable provider--New Wave Communications = FAIL
Funnily enough, while the local servers only returned ~250-260kb/s down and 24kb/s up, connecting to a London server gave me the highest downloads - 285kb/s - and a Paris server gave me the lowest ping and highest upload - 14ms and 27kb/s.
And that's disregarding the fact that on a clean connection, my uTorrent regularly pulls 300kb/s down and 35kb/s up.
Yes, low ping times are better. Simply put, it's the amount of time it takes for you to send a request to a site and them to send a response back.I have no idea how to read these things, but I'm pretty sure I'm aiming for a low ping?