- 1,762
- NG9
- Shin_Roh
Give Kazunori and the PD team some recognition for their accomplishments rather than bash them for spoiling you're unrealistic gaming fantasies!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fddef/fddefb537796bbfc24d1bbe6a0893a94858decfb" alt="sad-child1.gif"
Give Kazunori and the PD team some recognition for their accomplishments rather than bash them for spoiling you're unrealistic gaming fantasies!
Give Kazunori and the PD team some recognition for their accomplishments rather than bash them for spoiling you're unrealistic gaming fantasies!
Dude, Im probly just as much a 'real' GT fan as you in terms of all games owned, all cars aquired, black, etc. And believe me, I put alot of hours in, the like of which no man can fathom!(GT3) What's unfair is that you guys are putting your own wishes upon the rest of the GT world. It's not enough that we got day/night, weather, cockpit, karting, 3DHD, motion dection, GPS mapping. No, you guys want EVERYTHING. Why not make your own game or contribute something of worth to Kaz and his team and stop being immature?
I hope I can get me a decent performing premium car from the used car list right from the beginning.
If I was given $60m, the time PD have had and the marketing power their brand has, I'd probably not have made a game and have been wasted on a yatch somewhere, so, you know, consider yourself lucky GT5 exists at all.
Its still very strange that Kaz hasn't realy shown us good pictures of the Standard cars.
How they look compared to premiums,
Will they race alongside premiums,
Will they look bad in photomode(if you can even use them in photomode),
Will they be as customisable as premiums,
Will they sound as bad as they did in that short trailer,
What will damage be like for them(visual and mechanical).
Those are a few questions that could do with clearing up,
and not just with specualtion but actual facts.
Damn! Dude, what will be left for the buyers to find out for themselves? As if we didn't get enough info on GT5 already, smh. That just leaves nothing to be discovered afterward.
'cough'Forza'cough'how many games out there have you seen with 200+ cockpit views? none? exactly. so stop complaining.
how many games out there have you seen with 200+ cockpit views? none? exactly. so stop complaining.
The thread is the standards vs premiums debate, I'm debating my point of view, that isn't immature, its to be expected,
Look at the size of this thread, its fairly obvious this is a decisive issue.
EDIT: I also never meant to infer you were not a real GT fan, if thats what you read from my post.
Fair enough dude, see you on the black-topI was being sarcastic about creating your own game, but anyway, my PS3 is cleaned out, Im hungry, and the thread continues. No hard feelings dude, just my opinions. Later man! Hey, we might meet in GT5 and settle this in a race?
Forza 3.......... You asked.
Forza 3.......... You asked.
Next time Revelation1115, you mention the physics, weather, and tuning details in addition to the 200+ cockpit view. Srry to say, I saw it coming, lol.
I probably would have done the same
Except I would be on a yacht![]()
200 GT5 cockpits are far better than 400 Forza 3 cockpits. i think that PD could make some of Forza 3 cockpits for standard cars ...
That's the being wasted part, has impeeded by spelling as well.![]()
I wonder if PD just don't see it as a big deal. You know, because they've just included the "Standards" as an extra thing for those players that would miss certain cars (given the revamped physics, weather etc.) since they knew they were going to have to cut down the car list dramatically for the next game. That's certainly in line with their original plan for GT:HD.
It's a bit like when Kaz laughed at the skidmarks thing. He obviously finds it amusing that we obsess over certain stuff that he himself knows everything about. He can clearly see why things are a certain way, and he's probably taken aback when the fans get it all wrong. Blame communication (they are Japanese; I wonder if these issues are as prominent in Japan?), maybe, I don't know. I suppose that's the biggest issue, that some people feel they were promised 1000+ cars of the same standard - sorry, Premium.
Frankly, now's about the time to get over that and just consider the facts, outside of any "promises" expressed or implied (anyone remember GT4?): there are 200+ GT5 cars, and the GT4 and GTPSP cars are going to be playable too, but probably not have all of the GT5-specific features.
Customisation, sound, and cockpit view are the few things (that I can think of) which will probably suffer. (Feel free to add to this, of course...)
Weather ought not be an issue for the Standards (it's just particle / shader / screen-space effects, excluding a particular viewpoint).
Same for Day / Night (it's just lighting).
Then there is the questionable assertion that they look crap next to Premiums. Personally, I don't care about that, but for others, it's the single thing which incenses them. That on / off switch for Standards is almost definitely a good idea.
I'll probably get a lot of stick for this post, something about "PD sympathiser", but **** it.
What does that even mean in response to what I said?if you want to see the standard cars, just play gt4
I wonder if PD just don't see it as a big deal. You know, because they've just included the "Standards" as an extra thing for those players that would miss certain cars (given the revamped physics, weather etc.) since they knew they were going to have to cut down the car list dramatically for the next game. That's certainly in line with their original plan for GT:HD.
It's a bit like when Kaz laughed at the skidmarks thing. He obviously finds it amusing that we obsess over certain stuff that he himself knows everything about. He can clearly see why things are a certain way, and he's probably taken aback when the fans get it all wrong. Blame communication (they are Japanese; I wonder if these issues are as prominent in Japan?), maybe, I don't know. I suppose that's the biggest issue, that some people feel they were promised 1000+ cars of the same standard - sorry, Premium.
Frankly, now's about the time to get over that and just consider the facts, outside of any "promises" expressed or implied (anyone remember GT4?): there are 200+ GT5 cars, and the GT4 and GTPSP cars are going to be playable too, but probably not have all of the GT5-specific features.
Customisation, sound, and cockpit view are the few things (that I can think of) which will probably suffer. (Feel free to add to this, of course...)
Weather ought not be an issue for the Standards (it's just particle / shader / screen-space effects, excluding a particular viewpoint).
Same for Day / Night (it's just lighting).
Then there is the questionable assertion that they look crap next to Premiums. Personally, I don't care about that, but for others, it's the single thing which incenses them. That on / off switch for Standards is almost definitely a good idea.
I'll probably get a lot of stick for this post, something about "PD sympathiser", but **** it.
What PD knew or planned, (assuming there was one) is anybody's guess.
We were never promised anything, but rather in the absence of specifics, left open to draw your own expectational conclusions. IMO especially after GT5P.
In review of all that has gone before, at some point there had to be a realization that there were not enough resources to develop all the features and have all premium cars. Maybe it was from the gitgo, but the opposite, as indicated could easily be considered a real probability as we passed the 4-5 yr mark with still a ways to go.
It doesn't necessarily dampen my enthusiasm for the "finally released GT5" but I'm not sure how much of that at this point is just "give me what you got and and let me play it already".
Once I can do that, I'll let you know whether " I'm over it or not".
BTW I don't consider you a PD sympathiser because of your comment.
But then again, truth be known, I guess we all are to some extent or another.
What does that even mean in response to what I said?