evilfoxhound
(Banned)
- 639
It's funnyer that someone thought the joke was so good, that they watermarked it LOL
It's funnyer that someone thought the joke was so good, that they watermarked it LOL
Premium cars don't have to be fast. And it's their game, they can do whatever the hell they want. The only loss of standards is the cockpit view, the slightly worse look, and the lack of chamging whels. Big deal![]()
And the lack of quality, if I'm honest. Any idiot could have ported over 800 cars from GT4. It takes a real bunch of arrogant ***** to do this and then charge £40 for the privilege of playing them in HD.
And the lack of quality, if I'm honest. Any idiot could have ported over 800 cars from GT4. It takes a real bunch of arrogant ***** to do this and then charge £40 for the privilege of playing them in HD.
And the lack of quality, if I'm honest. Any idiot could have ported over 800 cars from GT4. It takes a real bunch of arrogant ***** to do this and then charge £40 for the privilege of playing them in HD.
Somebody call the waambulance. Apparently, you do not know what it is like to meticulously model 3d vehicles at a high polygon count. It is not as simple as pressing a convert button on the standard models.
When I see you're name in the credits of a racing game that's better than GT5, that statement will be relevant. Until then, you're just another kid on a forum who thinks they know better than PD.
When I see you're name in the credits of a racing game that's better than GT5, that statement will be relevant. Until then, you're just another kid on a forum who thinks they know better than PD.
I haven't made a movie but know Transformers 2 was a pile, as just one example.
Forza gave us 400 right off the bat. In half the time it took GT5 to finally finish development. Have you got an answer for that, smartarse?
Plus Photo Travel. Plus the Photomode restrictions. Plus a crappy damage engine. Plus hell knows what else. Do keep up.Premium cars don't have to be fast. And it's their game, they can do whatever the hell they want. The only loss of standards is the cockpit view, the slightly worse look, and the lack of chamging whels. Big deal![]()
Personally, I'm THRILLED to get to drive all of GT4's cars again, but this time with far superior physics
It's "The Real Driving Simulator" not "The Real Car-Viewing Simulator". Not having an in-car view certainly stings, but is it really going to hurt your enjoyment of the game that much?
Someone is confused.I think it just smacks of laziness (sitting around) and over-ambition (working too hard on something) by Kaz and the PD team.
I know a place where those Standard car's would feel right at home
http://findingschools.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/garbage.jpg
*Man i just cant do anything right*![]()
You mean a massive workload chosen by Kaz to be worked on during GT5 development. If PD was seriously bitten by the development of GTPSP, they have no one to blame but themselves.But seriously, some of you guys think GT PSP was simply done by a Convert button, rather than a massive workload dumped on Kaz and the team in the ninth hour of GT5 development.
i am a diehard cockpit kinda guy.........enough said......and off topic am i the only person in gt land that wants a 87-93 5.0 mustang lx ( with trunk lid ) ??????????????????????
I'm glad I didn't give a turd about GT PSP. What a waste of time that is.
Nope, but I want the hatch.i am a diehard cockpit kinda guy.........enough said......and off topic am i the only person in gt land that wants a 87-93 5.0 mustang lx ( with trunk lid ) ??????????????????????
Plus Photo Travel. Plus the Photomode restrictions. Plus a crappy damage engine. Plus hell knows what else. Do keep up.![]()