- 3,915
- California
- gdwest1
That's fine if they do that, but when it goes away you don't get to complain about it.I'd really like to see those articles on how NASCAR hands out subsidies. I guarantee that even if they did, Don Panoz did just as much subsidizing in the ALMS if now more when they had an actual prototype grid. What team owner in their right mind would not run a series that you could make a guaranteed profit off of courtesy of the sanctioning body where the other one didn't and was more expensive to run as is based on operating cost.
http://www.autoweek.com/article/gra...mpse-grand-am-rolex-series-financial-troubles
Marshall Pruitt was able to confirm that a "Substantial" number of teams got similar deals.
Ed Brown was never guaranteed a good result.The few rich guys that raced the ALMS(not all the rich guys chose the ALMS) because they had a class structure where they were pretty much guaranteed a good result and because they had a ratings system where the funded driver didn't have to race all the professionals.
3rd isn't good if it's a class of 4 cars. They know that.
Except 2 of those cars are funded by a sole business at the discretion of their owner/driver. All of the P2 cars in the ELMS and WEC (except SMP) are paid for on a business basis.There are more full season DP teams after the updates than the WEC has LMP2 teams. ELMS doesn't exactly have stellar numbers either. Counting the DW as a full season entrant, there are I believe the same number of IMSA Prototypes as WEC LMP2 and ELMS LMP2 entries for their seasons. Hardly making it work if you ask me
I don't think paying people to show up counts as working.Aside from the inaugural season of the DP, there has never been fewer than 9 full season entrants. Subsidized or not, that's more than making it work.
You missed the point. Rebellion have enough money that they WASTE cubic dollars on their own P1 car with no chance of winning. Are they in the press whining about cost? Nope. They're upset with the lack of entrants.I doubt Rebellion could find 4 renters for said program unless they didn't need the money from the renters then they could just find an obscure silver rated driver who's got pro level speed and experience and mop the floor.
And the long term.Getting rid of GTLM would certainly hurt the series short term
Did they? They had to buy out a competing series. If the product was so good, they would've let the ALMS sink itself.but grand am never had a factory GT program and they got by.
Regardless, the buyout was supposed to stop people from "Getting by" and start creating something awesome. Why do you just want to get by? Let's grow the fan base! Let's have manufacturers spend money! Let's have customers lining up to buy the cars!
Only DP teams were receiving subsidies as I recall. Regardless, this comment was made intentionally in such a way to be a bit condescending. Kind of upsetting that you're trying to make this personal, when I'm only putting facts on the ground.Unless NASCAR was dropping enough subsidies into the series to pay for a DP grid of 15+ and GT grids of 15+ for a whole decade, I don't see that logic.
If the manufacturers leave then the marketing stops, and the sport can't grow. Nobody is going to rally around Jeroen Bleekemolen, if anyone becomes a household name, it'll be from a Factory car.I really don't think it would change a whole lot after the first year of not having the factory teams. Get them building a customer car for the privateers like Porsche, Ferrari, Audi, Ford, and others do and support them. That gets all that money back into the series helping the privateers compete as well. Everyone wins.
One is closer to the road car, driven by rich guys, the other is more of a custom-built race car, a bit harder to drive, but faster. Designed for the pros.Try to explain why these 2 Ferrari 458s aren't in the same class to someone who doesn't know a lot about sports car racing.
If they can't handle that explanation, then they aren't cut out for anything. Either they accept what it is because they want to be a fan, or they aren't interested anyway and it doesn't matter.
You seem to dwell on the glory days of Grand Am, that's gone now. If they were doing so well, they wouldn't have needed to buy the ALMS out. If the ALMS were doing it right, they wouldn't have let themselves be bought out.
Last edited: