- 3,016
- Columbus, Ohio
RBR should just stuff a bag of flour into a racing helmet and put that in their second car. Given that they built the entire team around one person, it'd probably post the same results as anyone else who's not named Max.
I read last month Hamilton has every intent to move forward with the team, but made a statement that now wasn't the time to discuss a big contract with the current state of the world's economy. Seemed like he was concerned about his image looking poorly in relation to being such a big activist.Nicked this list from Sky... I hadn't realised how many TBCs there were on next year's grid. Hamilton at Mercedes seems a given, I'm not so sure about the RBR seat.
Redbull have to hire a driver outside their program for that second seat, Perez being gone from RP honestly is the perfect Sceniaro driver for Redbull, he can be their Webber untill they give their driver program time to bring a natural replacement.
For Alfa Romeo I would be picking Shwartzman even if he doesn't win the title, this is his first season of F2 straight from winning the F3 title, he looks to have the most raw talent given how much of an advantage experience is in F2.
If you read the headline improperly, it sounds like they will have 1 driver for every 2.5 seats. No wonder the team is struggling.https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/152014/haas-looking-at-close-to-10-drivers-for-21-seats
That's Romain and K-Mag confirmed for next year, then./S
When it comes to those Alfa seat, the top 3 drivers in F2 are all Ferrari young drivers and are starting to perform well enough that they can be classed as "ready for F1". IMO, it should be pretty simple. "Win the title and you get Kimi's seat. Come second and you get Giovinazzi's seat". The car may be awful this year, but neither are really performing great in it this year. Kimi has only had flashes of speed in the last few rounds, while Giovinazzi keeps crashing. if Illot and Shwartzmann beat Schumacher, so be it. They're ready and he missed out. If Tsunoda somehow comes alive in these last rounds and wins the title, then Alfa take just one of the drivers and Kimi/Antonio keeps their seat.
I don't see Alfa needing to get someone like Hulkenberg, Perez or Magnussen into a seat because the F2 challengers have looked really good this season.
Sad to hear Checo is leaving Racing Point.
Moving to Haas? Dear god no. He deserves a car to fight for that elusive F1 win, not struggle with a car with such a low ceiling.
I pray he can get a seat with a competitive team.
If you read the headline improperly, it sounds like they will have 1 driver for every 2.5 seats. No wonder the team is struggling.
I think going forward after seeing what RP have done with copying the Mercedes, I suspect the Alpha Tauri's going forward are going to be as much a Redbull Chassis as is legally possible under the regs making the car Similar in performance.Horner claiming thatMinardiToro RossoAlpha Tauri are now "a sister team rather than a junior team" and that "it wouldn't make sense" to swap Gasly and Albon.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/152042/horner-swapping-gasly-and-albon-wouldnt-make-sense
Have to say that if Red Bull do take this approach (and honestly who knows with Red Bull) that would seem the most sensible. We've seen these past couple of seasons that Faenza can punch above their weight in F1's midfield and that Gasly is leading that charge. If Gasly can be a strong number 1 at that team and take the team up higher in the constructor's standings that will only mean more prize money for Red Bull.
The question, as it has been for some time now, is whether Red Bull want to focus solely on being "Team Verstappen" or if they want to put up a serious two car challenge in the constructors over the next couple of years. If it's the former then either they can stick with Albon or put Kvyat in the second car, but if it's the latter then Pérez to Red Bull would be a juicy prospect, while Gasly and Albon at Toro Rosso could be one of the most exciting young lineups in F1 and potentially make some waves in the F1 midfield.
Schumacher has taken the lead in F2 so far. If he wins the championship he deserves that seat, but so does any of the top guys in that championship who'd be worthy of a promotion.At Alfa Romeo, I wonder if they will take 2 of the FDA drivers on. Probably Mick Schumacher alongside whoever does best in the F2 Championship. Schumacher probably doesn't deserve a seat over Shwartzmann, but the people making driver decisions are going to be heavily swayed by the surname and what it means to Ferrari...
Schumacher probably doesn't deserve a seat over Shwartzmann, but the people making driver decisions are going to be heavily swayed by the surname and what it means to Ferrari...
Schumacher has taken the lead in F2 so far. If he wins the championship he deserves that seat, but so does any of the top guys in that championship who'd be worthy of a promotion.
Your driver needs to be monetisable, they need to be good for the sponsors, they need to generate press. That stands Mick Schumacher in good stead in exactly the same way as a fat sponsorship portfolio. If he can demonstrate that he's a genuine member of the top-pick group then I don't see why a team wouldn't want him.
How do you know it's down to Racing Point? It may have been a Vettel requirement not to have someone in the team that could give him some problems.Remember when the Toro Rosso was actually last seasons Red Bull car, and they got an earful + regulation changes as a result... This doesn't seem very far off that, but it does prove they could have been a lot closer had they chosen to be. They were probably just aware that the scrutiny would have been 10 times worse...
I'm really disappointed that Racing Point have not shown Perez the same loyalty he has shown them. He has been there since 2014 I think? To sign a 3 year contract last year showed again his commitment to the project, and now this... Oof.
At Alfa Romeo, I wonder if they will take 2 of the FDA drivers on. Probably Mick Schumacher alongside whoever does best in the F2 Championship. Schumacher probably doesn't deserve a seat over Shwartzmann, but the people making driver decisions are going to be heavily swayed by the surname and what it means to Ferrari...
How do you know it's down to Racing Point? It may have been a Vettel requirement not to have someone in the team that could give him some problems.
The issue with RB and TR back then was that Red Bull were literally building Toro Rosso’s car for them. TR did nothing in the way of construction. The specific rule is that a team must BUILD the car themselves, not DESIGN it. This is an important distinction. The FIA clarified back then that Toro Rosso needed to build their car themselves, rather than have the parent team just give them a hand-me-down. It’s related to the 1982 Concorde agreement that forbade privateer teams. TR’s argument was that they were technically a part of Red Bull, so they should be allowed access to the parent’s info. The FIA told them that as a separately registered team, they were not considered a part of RB as far as the regulations concerned.Remember when the Toro Rosso was actually last seasons Red Bull car, and they got an earful + regulation changes as a result... This doesn't seem very far off that, but it does prove they could have been a lot closer had they chosen to be. They were probably just aware that the scrutiny would have been 10 times worse...
I'm really disappointed that Racing Point have not shown Perez the same loyalty he has shown them. He has been there since 2014 I think? To sign a 3 year contract last year showed again his commitment to the project, and now this... Oof.
At Alfa Romeo, I wonder if they will take 2 of the FDA drivers on. Probably Mick Schumacher alongside whoever does best in the F2 Championship. Schumacher probably doesn't deserve a seat over Shwartzmann, but the people making driver decisions are going to be heavily swayed by the surname and what it means to Ferrari...
The issue with RB and TR back then was that Red Bull were literally building Toro Rosso’s car for them. TR did nothing in the way of construction. The specific rule is that a team must BUILD the car themselves, not DESIGN it. This is an important distinction. The FIA clarified back then that Toro Rosso needed to build their car themselves, rather than have the parent team just give them a hand-me-down. It’s related to the 1982 Concorde agreement that forbade privateer teams. TR’s argument was that they were technically a part of Red Bull, so they should be allowed access to the parent’s info. The FIA told them that as a separately registered team, they were not considered a part of RB as far as the regulations concerned.
The issue with Racing Point this season was that many people up and down the paddock believed RP’s car this year was TOO close a copy of last year’s Merc to be a simple reverse-engineer job from photographs alone. Specifically because they used the same wind tunnel as Merc, so people were saying that Mercedes had granted them access to the W10’s technical blueprints. Teams are disallowed from sharing technical documents and personnel with each other (Which is why TR/AT’s cars aren’t direct 1:1 copies of RB’s anymore), so if it could be proven that RP had access to Mercedes documents rather than simple reverse engineering, they would fall afoul of the regulations regarding ‘building the car yourself’. The final catalyst was their brake ducts, which were practically identical to the W10s, despite RP having no realistic way to have been able to reverse engineer them without having direct access to their blueprints.
I don’t remember the exact situation, but I think it came to light that RP had used a technicality to buy the Merc brakes last year when it was still legal to do so, then designed their own variants of them for this year despite the fact that starting this season, it was no longer legal to buy brakes from another team. The ruling the FIA handed them is basically “You know you’re guilty, we know you’re guilty, but you didn’t actually violate the letter of the law. We’re giving you a slap on the wrist, so don’t do it again.” RP decided to not challenge it because it was more trouble than it was worth.
It were idiot fans that don’t understand the regulations who were saying things like “you can’t copy someone’s car! That’s not fair, it’s cheating! You have to design your own, otherwise everyone would just copy everyone else and the whole grid would just be Mercedes copies!” That was never the FIA or rival teams’ argument.
American-Mexican team sounds like a good pair. I assume perez still has the telemex backing?