Cap'n Jack
Premium
- 10,147
- South of the South
- GoldMineGutted
Election called. Let’s gooooo!
The one thing I have always disliked about this series is the long waits between rounds.Just been given the go ahead by Supercars.
![]()
Supercars commits to Adelaide 500 season-finale
The 2018 Adelaide 500 Supercars has confirmed its plans to close out the 2022 season on the streets of Adelaide.www.speedcafe.com
Only problem I have, is that there's going to be a month break between Gold Coast at the end of October and Adelaide in early December. A long wait, especially if the championship is still up for grabs.
It's borderline the moves on Cam and WD but there are ok. It's hard racing but it's also smart because he isn't allowing them to have the chance to do anything because of the sidedraft. But the move can go wrong as we saw with Frosty and Reynolds which took out Chaz. So it's borderline because we saw what can happen if it goes wrong.Shane's being Shane as usual.
While personally I think the move on WD was okay and the one on Cam was borderline (leaning more to the illegal side) both moves were actually against the rules. I've highlighted the relevant part.It's borderline the moves on Cam and WD but there are ok. It's hard racing but it's also smart because he isn't allowing them to have the chance to do anything because of the sidedraft. But the move can go wrong as we saw with Frosty and Reynolds which took out Chaz. So it's borderline because we saw what can happen if it goes wrong.
Hmm... interesting indeed. Well this is gonna cause the usually politics on brand lines about what the rule is. Putting my Holden hat off and looking at the rule you've highlighted he should've been penalised. For some reason it wasn't even looked at. So it comes down to interruption. Obviously for all of us it's different to Shane's and the stewards on what's ok and what's not.While personally I think the move on WD was okay and the one on Cam was borderline (leaning more to the illegal side) both moves were actually against the rules. I've highlighted the relevant part.
View attachment 1129380
From here: https://dscxx9mer61ho.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2022-Div-B-CLEAN-28.01.2022.pdf
Edit: Just spotted this on Speedcafe...
View attachment 1129393
Definitely illegal imo.... and no Cam you won't be able to give it back. How does he not know this yet!!!
Yep, it comes down to interpretation, and unfortunately this is where Supercars are consistently inconsistent with their rulings. Bad luck they don't actually go by the rule book.Hmm... interesting indeed. Well this is gonna cause the usually politics on brand lines about what the rule is. Putting my Holden hat off and looking at the rule you've highlighted he should've been penalised. For some reason it wasn't even looked at. So it comes down to interruption. Obviously for all of us it's different to Shane's and the stewards on what's ok and what's not.
Yes that is most definitely an improvement. Extra red is good too.It's amazing what a change of sponsor can do for a livery. The Hino logo looks much better on the side than the Seiko one did, imo. Just looks cleaner.
![]()
I wonder if doing a free trial of Kayo through a VPN would work. 🤔Wish I could watch the races.....
Someone on facebook said they are able to watch them through SuperView on the website, not on YouTube.I wonder if doing a free trial of Kayo through a VPN would work. 🤔
Well, if it makes you feel any better. You didn't miss out on anything with the third race.Wish I could watch the races.....
Can confirm this does work. I helped out a mate in New Zealand a couple years back who had no other way of watching Bathurst.I wonder if doing a free trial of Kayo through a VPN would work. 🤔
Haha, I had called it and was about to get up and go to the shops before the Grand Prix started. Then SVG had his lock up.Another non event even when Van Gisbergen starts further back
edit: maybe not