For somebody that "won the debate by a huuuggge margin", "so far ahead in all the polls", etc. He sure is going to extreme measures to keep out of the spotlight and avoid any possible questioning of his lunatic behavior.
Just how JD Vance is, answer no questions and shift blame to someone else.Huh, seems like every problem in America is directly Kamala Harris' fault.
Just parroting his leader.Huh, seems like every problem in America is directly Kamala Harris' fault.
If he wanted to defend free speech, maybe should've brought up Trump attacking 1A through saying criticizing SC judges should be imprisonment, burning the flag should be a year in jail, or that media companies should have their licenses revoked for daring to attack him.Ugh. So apparently Walz said that you can't yell fire in a crowded theater.
Jon Stewart specifically brought this one up as he even threatened late night comedians who criticised him. Walz should've mentioned all of this.If he wanted to defend free speech, maybe should've brought up Trump attacking 1A through saying criticizing SC judges should be imprisonment, burning the flag should be a year in jail, or that media companies should have their licenses revoked for daring to attack him.
I thought everything was Joe Biden's fault??Huh, seems like every problem in America is directly Kamala Harris' fault.
Or Obama's before that.I thought everything was Joe Biden's fault??
Haven't you heard? Ever since Biden dropped out, it's actually the Vice President who controls the groceries, gas, energy, trades, war, etc. policies.I thought everything was Joe Biden's fault??
Isnt this the case, except for the executive orders with POTUS stamp on it?believe all of Trump's "accomplishments" are actually Pence's.
For me it was "the rules were you guys weren't going to fact-check"This bottom tweet was the crux of the debate for me:
I stopped listening to that bit when he ranted on so long they yanked the mike on him. He sounded hellbent on unilaterally declaring TPS illegal to shore up his one-note immigrants-bad narrative.For me it was "the rules were you guys weren't going to fact-check"
He could always try pleading inanity.He sure is getting ready to pander for clemency based on diminished responsibility.
Walz didn't come off super friendly. I think that's about all I missed on.Vance is a tool, and Walz is a good guy. But I think Vance and Walz will both keep it relatively tame. I think Vance can do a better job of staying on point than Trump, and Walz will not be anywhere near as adept as Kamala. Walz is a governor and teacher, but Kamala was a prosecutor. So I think it ends up much more even than Trump v. Harris.
I've definitely seen Walz get tripped up during speeches, and headlines are saying that he's already nervous. Vance is not going to come off as a human, but better than Trump almost for sure.
All of that being said, there is a huge difference between the two in terms of how relatable, genuine, and honest they are. So maybe Walz can just come off super friendly.
I thought it was notable how he went from this during Vance's vacillation:Walz didn't come off super friendly. I think that's about all I missed on.
I thought it was notable how he went from this during Vance's vacillation:
View attachment 1393777
... to the friendly uncle of his practised closing speech which I guess he's expecting the news media to broadcast in isolation so people don't notice the change.
View attachment 1393695
No wonder he bailed. Trump is the most dishonest President of all time.
Please, Coach, don't **** up tonight...
It's easy to propagandise based on visuals alone. "We don't want you to watch so here's a funny pic." Turning the sound up revealed a different story to me and I guess also to a number of poll respondents.Mostly so far I've seen discussions of Vance "winning" which is annoying because whichever politician came off more polished is not necessarily the one that "wins" voters - so they should drop the whole win/lose narrative.
I think the post-debate polls disagree there. Both men got a good jump in favorability & a couple outlets with featuring their undecided voters voted in favor of Walz.Mostly so far I've seen discussions of Vance "winning" which is annoying because whichever politician came off more polished is not necessarily the one that "wins" voters - so they should drop the whole win/lose narrative. I've also seen discussions of Vance trying to hold on to the thoroughly debunked 2020 "stolen election" nonsense, including fact checking and cut mics. And finally I've seen commentary on them saying they agree with each other a lot - which I think is an attempt by both sides to own a centrist label.
In the end, I don't think it matters much. Vance appearing slick is probably mostly off-putting. Walz looking disappointed most of the time didn't make him super likable either. I also doubt that the voters that were targeted were even watching. So mostly this was to make campaign ads out of, which Walz probably got the better of.
So mostly this was to make campaign ads out of, which Walz probably got the better of.