Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC 

  • Thread starter daan
  • 140,156 comments
  • 38,719,055 views
If you can unpack the data, you can change the car's weight in car.ini and keep the data.acd as a backup (like data_backup.acd). It should then take the info from the data folder and not the packed data. Just don't try to pack the data.
Thank you for your answer, but this doesn't work for me. When I unpack the data.acd of the folder "bk_audi_r8_lms_2019" with CM, the ini-files have only unreadable useless content as the data.acd is encrypted.
 
The other reason modders encrypt is to hide stuff.
Just looked at the Bentley GT3 car and it has "copyright of untied racing design" in the tyres ini and i'd guess there is much more that is URD physics that the modder then encrypted.
To hide, rather than claim i'd guess.
90 percent of AC users won't go all detective like a modder can.
Same as when i went into Tommy 78's sierra RS500 mod recently to take some bits for my RS500 PCars conversion.....
Guess what...... Tommy's is PCars RS500.
OK so he did some stuff to it, but he claims scratch made I believe and charges money.

There is a lot of stuff that people like to hide, same way as there is a way around stopping CM analyse tool recognising you took kunos cars physics just by changing a few spellings in the data files.

Data file encryption is so dumb because you just open the data file, copy and paste to another data folder make a totally new car folder and data isn't now encrypted.

If i can be bothered i am going to do a Bentley GT3 car and use the same data as that encrypted one to prove a point.
Not sure i have the energy as its such a run of the mill sim car and i could use my time to do something interesting.

yo, some URD guy here thats going to tell you that you talk so much nonsense its unbelievable. chem got perms from the head of URD himself to use those tyres upon my request. if you dont even know anything about that id rather keep shut than shouting stuff you cant even claim to be true. i dare you to take this tyre data for your own mod, you will recieve consequences for stealing that. if thats all there is to offer for a free mod with good physics, talking the man down that released multiple cars for free then thats just a sad place still. hoped to not come back and see people going ape mode cause a 3d is encrypted, if youre so keen on changeing stuff why dont yall self proclaimed elite modders convert the car in better quality yourself?
 
But probably bought and paid for through official channels? I think Codemasters tried to pass a modder's work off as their own with no permission obtained.
Like i said there was more to it as codemasters didn't need permission as they owned the license.
Not so much passing it off as there own as a multimillion pound developer has plenty of in house guys and have the resources to get models done.
I guess they saw a model and just took it as the modder had no official rights to complain.
It may of been an old fashioned FU.
Thing about encryption is that i guess the worst part of all of this is people being able to obtain pay mods, encryption doesn't stop that.
If i were a modder trying to sell stuff I'd be far more concerned about that than someone working out your encrypted data file is actually a URD GT3 car or the nice Sierra DTM car you scratch made is actually from PCars.

But again i fall into the bubble trap myself, i assume that because i see pay mods going for free on massive spread sheets, that everyone is getting them, but clearly they aren't.
I remember they did not get permission originally and the community got outraged and then they either paid the guy a small amount at that was the end of the story or was the guy hired by Kunos? I don't remember the details.


Either way, the license means everything, the 3D model no matter who made it is still the property of the manufacturer. So unless it was one game taking the model mesh directly from another game, that's another story.
 
I have the permission to use URD tyres xD
I work with URD together and it is the best for both sides to have a bigger GT3 field..
The rest of the physics is ACC based.
So don't bash things where you don't know whats going on.
I steal no physics data

Edit: if you want to do a new bentley, go for it. But using payware data without a permission isn't allowed you know?
But why do you want to do one, isn't my Version good enough?
Try if you want to do a better job but URD won't be happy about using their tyres
Classic.
So I was right, you used URD tyres but OK you asked them for it, ok fair enough.
But i wasn't wrong was i?
You encrypt data but its fruitless for anyone who knows a bit about modding to get the data, so my point was, what's the point?
GT3 cars are GT3 cars and they don't differ much in real life so I'd guess a decent GT3 mods data can happily fit into most cars.
You can't be doing much more that any of the current GT3 mods or even kunos cars can do.

I won't be doing a Bentley GT3 car and even if i did I'd do it to prove a point one how easy it is to make your own and use encrypted data.

For what its worth i liked the drive i had in yours, you did get dragged into the encryption topic as yours was most relevant.
I do actually apologise for that, it was lazy to use that one example and i meant no personal malice.

Having said all of that, any idea what URD could even do if i made a personal mod using their physics?
I mean considering Turn 10 don't seem to care about tonnes of their hard work being in AC?
Do URD have a bigger legal team than Turn 10?

yo, some URD guy here thats going to tell you that you talk so much nonsense its unbelievable. chem got perms from the head of URD himself to use those tyres upon my request. if you dont even know anything about that id rather keep shut than shouting stuff you cant even claim to be true. i dare you to take this tyre data for your own mod, you will recieve consequences for stealing that. if thats all there is to offer for a free mod with good physics, talking the man down that released multiple cars for free then thats just a sad place still. hoped to not come back and see people going ape mode cause a 3d is encrypted, if youre so keen on changeing stuff why dont yall self proclaimed elite modders convert the car in better quality yourself?
Calm down dear.
I just said it had URD tyres, which it does.... again please explain what URD can do about someone using their physics on a personal mod?
Kunos can't do anything about me changing something in their cars, you are the one talking garbage.
I can do what i like with any of my games thanks, i don't release stuff let alone try to sell it. So politely, do one.
There is literally a 'change tyres' thing in CM man, what the hell could URD do to stop anyo0ne using their tyres!
 
Classic.
So I was right, you used URD tyres but OK you asked them for it, ok fair enough.
But i wasn't wrong was i?
You encrypt data but its fruitless for anyone who knows a bit about modding to get the data, so my point was, what's the point?
GT3 cars are GT3 cars and they don't differ much in real life so I'd guess a decent GT3 mods data can happily fit into most cars.
You can't be doing much more that any of the current GT3 mods or even kunos cars can do.

I won't be doing a Bentley GT3 car and even if i did I'd do it to prove a point one how easy it is to make your own and use encrypted data.

For what its worth i liked the drive i had in yours, you did get dragged into the encryption topic as yours was most relevant.
I do actually apologise for that, it was lazy to use that one example and i meant no personal malice.

Having said all of that, any idea what URD could even do if i made a personal mod using their physics?
I mean considering Turn 10 don't seem to care about tonnes of their hard work being in AC?
Do URD have a bigger legal team than Turn 10?
The point isn't that I want to hide my physics. It is okay that somebody can look into them. I just encrypted the car that the original link has the latest version of the car, so that there aren't multiple versions with the same name..
And I can't do more then other GT3 Car mods out there or ks cars?
Well i can do more😄
If you know the right person, you can get real data of the car: from aeromaps to damper luts you can get anything.
All my cars use cphys with at least damper luts.
Camaro, Gallardo and Corvette have aeromaps in addition to that😉
Thats why I can do more then the other gt3 mods out there except for the bk Audi R8.
Well yeah anybody else can do that too but idk if they want to ask manufacturers for their data for a Single mod.
I just want the best for the community and the cars
 
I have the permission to use URD tyres xD
I work with URD together and it is the best for both sides to have a bigger GT3 field..
The rest of the physics is ACC based.
So don't bash things where you don't know whats going on.
I steal no physics data

Edit: if you want to do a new bentley, go for it. But using payware data without a permission isn't allowed you know?
But why do you want to do one, isn't my Version good enough?
Try if you want to do a better job but URD won't be happy about using their tyres

yo, some URD guy here thats going to tell you that you talk so much nonsense its unbelievable. chem got perms from the head of URD himself to use those tyres upon my request. if you dont even know anything about that id rather keep shut than shouting stuff you cant even claim to be true. i dare you to take this tyre data for your own mod, you will recieve consequences for stealing that. if thats all there is to offer for a free mod with good physics, talking the man down that released multiple cars for free then thats just a sad place still. hoped to not come back and see people going ape mode cause a 3d is encrypted, if youre so keen on changeing stuff why dont yall self proclaimed elite modders convert the car in better quality yourself?
Arguing with people over the internet is pointless. Regardless of who's right or wrong people will never change their minds. Better off ignoring all this
 
The point isn't that I want to hide my physics. It is okay that somebody can look into them. I just encrypted the car that the original link has the latest version of the car, so that there aren't multiple versions with the same name..
And I can't do more then other GT3 Car mods out there or ks cars?
Well i can do more😄
If you know the right person, you can get real data of the car: from aeromaps to damper luts you can get anything.
All my cars use cphys with at least damper luts.
Camaro, Gallardo and Corvette have aeromaps in addition to that😉
Thats why I can do more then the other gt3 mods out there except for the bk Audi R8.
Well yeah anybody else can do that too but idk if they want to ask manufacturers for their data for a Single mod.
I just want the best for the community and the cars
Fair enough, i already said i was using yours as an example as it was recent. I also have3 said i have no beef with encryption.
Ultimately i always end up getting rounded on, its fine you don't know me i don't know you.
Its the wild west in AC.
People do what they have to do, I get it, but in the end models are everywhere and anything that carries a price tag will get chucked out there for free.
Ilija makes money from no license for using kunos base game despite Reiza having to pay for madness engine.
Kunos are fine as 8 years later it out sells about everything sim road based.
Regardless CSP and CM are the game version of a ripped model.
It's literally there everyday telling you its ok to take stuff, its no biggy.

I don't and will never care about doing whatever i like with personal (or private if you prefer) mods.
Nothing anyone can do about that, it would be like JK Rowling finding out I changed Harry Potter to Hairy Pratter when i read it to my kids and suing me.....

Arguing with people over the internet is pointless. Regardless of who's right or wrong people will never change their minds. Better off ignoring all this
Apart from p0rn, that IS the point of the internet....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nissan-z400-gt500-super-gt-2022-2023-nismo-exterior-3d-model-5a3139f7e1.jpg

Ok, who's gonna make this then...?! Oh man, I wish I could 😖
 
Classic.
So I was right, you used URD tyres but OK you asked them for it, ok fair enough.
But i wasn't wrong was i?
You encrypt data but its fruitless for anyone who knows a bit about modding to get the data, so my point was, what's the point?
GT3 cars are GT3 cars and they don't differ much in real life so I'd guess a decent GT3 mods data can happily fit into most cars.
You can't be doing much more that any of the current GT3 mods or even kunos cars can do.

I won't be doing a Bentley GT3 car and even if i did I'd do it to prove a point one how easy it is to make your own and use encrypted data.

For what its worth i liked the drive i had in yours, you did get dragged into the encryption topic as yours was most relevant.
I do actually apologise for that, it was lazy to use that one example and i meant no personal malice.

Having said all of that, any idea what URD could even do if i made a personal mod using their physics?
I mean considering Turn 10 don't seem to care about tonnes of their hard work being in AC?
Do URD have a bigger legal team than Turn 10?


Calm down dear.
I just said it had URD tyres, which it does.... again please explain what URD can do about someone using their physics on a personal mod?
Kunos can't do anything about me changing something in their cars, you are the one talking garbage.
I can do what i like with any of my games thanks, i don't release stuff let alone try to sell it. So politely, do one.
There is literally a 'change tyres' thing in CM man, what the hell could URD do to stop anyo0ne using their tyres!
youve been warned, we know how to handle such cases. simply cause kunos doesnt care doesnt mean we wont care either. isnt like you worked your ass off testing physics to match irl counterparts. all you say is basically i could do this and that, in the end nothing happens. seems like there is no value behind your word besides "i hope nothing will happen" since you asked so often what we can do. the usage is strictly forbidden for anyone not granted permission, such as chem got and we dont care if its private or not, in the end the outcome is the same, you take something youre not allowed to. you also totally seem to ignore every fact stated as soon as you read encrypted, its his damn decission to encrypt model work on a car, the port or scratch parts. better think twice what you will say in the future and dont blame yourself again for half knowledge. cause thats quite embarrasing what you demonstrated here xD

Arguing with people over the internet is pointless. Regardless of who's right or wrong people will never change their minds. Better off ignoring all this
quite funny to see this place conserves better than iphone pricetags, that beeing said urd cars are also getting encryption from now on so enjoy the mayham mate.
 
the saddest part in all this is that theres enough talent in this forum to come together more often and release some really cracking stuff.

ive tried reaching out to people in the past but most seem to be in this little clique of circle jerkers

worse still are the sheeple which will like anything anyone in this clique posts. probably a mixture of beta males and bot accounts tbf.

thus is life.

@safi hellie I find some of your mods very cool and can appreciate your penchant for the unusual but releasing mods, at least on here, just isnt worth the hassle imo. I get nothing but passive agressivness fueld by jealousy and worse still flat out hatred.

and thats coming from somone whose vast majority of work has been free and unencrypted.

@CrisT86 i want to release the beta of Spa 83 by the end of the week. it is based off the 1988 version which in turn features your config etc.
 
the saddest part in all this is that theres enough talent in this forum to come together more often and release some really cracking stuff.

ive tried reaching out to people in the past but most seem to be in this little clique of circle jerkers

worse still are the sheeple which will like anything anyone in this clique posts. probably a mixture of beta males and bot accounts tbf.

thus is life.

@safi hellie I find some of your mods very cool and can appreciate your penchant for the unusual but releasing mods, at least on here, just isnt worth the hassle imo. I get nothing but passive agressivness fueld by jealousy and worse still flat out hatred.

and thats coming from somone whose vast majority of work has been free and unencrypted.

@CrisT86 i want to release the beta of Spa 83 by the end of the week. it is based off the 1988 version which in turn features your config etc.
Your observations are not exclusive to GTP. There are cliques on RD, facebook, discord, etc. Thus is life, so just do what makes you happy and with those that you enjoy being around. Speculating on how others feel (e.g. how can you prove jealously?) is likely not helping the situation.
 
Le Mans 1967

Le Mans 1967 v1.0

This is my take on the le_grand_circuit_1967 track done by Terra21 and updated by WooChoo and Virtua_LM. All credit for the track goes to those guys. I simply added some CSP features and altered a few textures\meshes to give it a look I prefer. It is a standalone track so as not to mess with the original and will come up as Le Mans 1967 in your track list. If you have a preferred ai you use with the original track, just copy it over to this version if you decide to use this. I'm not sure which ai version the track currently has right now because I was swapping out different versions.

Additions:

-- Seasonal changes.
-- Animated flags.
-- Animated CSP smoke in the fall and winter.

-- Slightly altered grass textures to fit my eye better. Three versions for this you can try if you want with a simple ext_config edit. Towards the bottom of the config is a section named Grass Look. There are two [SHADER_REPLACEMENT_...] sections for the GRASS_A_MUD material that you can set Active or Inactive to slightly change the look. If you set them both to ACTIVE=0, the grass will be much greener and more saturated. The two alternatives give a progressively more brown tint. I like having the second one set active, which is how it is by default. You can monkey around with the ambient and diffuse values to get a brightness you prefer.

-- Reworked sand areas to give them some character and eliminate the monotonous look. I took some creative liberties with this so it's not 100% accurate to the real track at that time. There are two ways you can have the sand areas look on the Mulsanne Straight. By default it has more green grass than it probably should, but it helps to break up the look. The second way has less grass and more of a brown tint. To enable the alternate version, open up the models.ini file and in the [MODEL_2] section, change the line that reads FILE=le_grand_circuit_1967_terrain.kn5 to FILE=le_grand_circuit_1967_terrain2.kn5.

-- New pine trees texture. This one has some faults because the trunks don't quite line up with the uv mapping correctly. The original pine tree texture had slightly curved trunks. Mine doesn't so you can see some double trunks in spots if you are really looking for them. It doesn't bother me, but if it does for you, just disable the Trees track skin.
-- The Misc track skin doesn't need to be enabled. It's a skin created by Instevs36 that I got from RD that I use at times. As mentioned, the Trees track skin can be disabled as well, but always leave the Terrain skin enabled.

View attachment 1248085
View attachment 1248086
Update to version 1.0. Final version for now. I may revisit it in the future. Everything is packaged together, including the 54 pit optional layouts.

-- New ext_config and replay cams created by @CrisT86 with improved track lighting for night races. He did other things as well, but I couldn't tell you what they are. I just know it looks good. Thank you @CrisT86.
-- Some minor tweaks to correct a few floating trees and very small adjustments to some material values. Nothing I think anyone will pick up on.
 
Last edited:
youve been warned, we know how to handle such cases. simply cause kunos doesnt care doesnt mean we wont care either. isnt like you worked your ass off testing physics to match irl counterparts. all you say is basically i could do this and that, in the end nothing happens. seems like there is no value behind your word besides "i hope nothing will happen" since you asked so often what we can do. the usage is strictly forbidden for anyone not granted permission, such as chem got and we dont care if its private or not, in the end the outcome is the same, you take something youre not allowed to. you also totally seem to ignore every fact stated as soon as you read encrypted, its his damn decission to encrypt model work on a car, the port or scratch parts. better think twice what you will say in the future and dont blame yourself again for half knowledge. cause thats quite embarrasing what you demonstrated here xD
You have admitted that the Bentley is from ACC including the physics, so the modder is on far more shaky ground including URD who are part of it via signing off on the tyres.
How you can moralise when you rip from ACC is laughable.
You just talk dribble, URD can't even stop sites giving their stuff away for free, this literal thread has ACC cars and track rips being shared, this is GTplanet as in Gran Turismo, which has people sharing out GT rips again of tracks and cars.
And nothing, happens.

To be clear then, the chap with the Bentley he ripped from ACC including its physics, he said "The rest of the physics is ACC based....." so then locks away the ripped model and ripped physic's...
And gets his gang involved in calling out others who might dare to go into the data file of the ripped mod.....
Actual wow. Just beyond anything before and I've seen a lot on here...

Whole thread devoted to messing with cars and tracks and somehow everyone is quiet and I'm the bad one.....
Everyone looks away, stays silent lets bonny who rips ACC models get on his high horse.

If people ripping ACC tracks and cars is acceptable how is fair that you think you can warn me about anything?
That whole Bentley is stolen off 505 games IP, real IP not some made up IP by some kid in his basement.

Might send them an email tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
You have admitted that the Bentley is from ACC including the physics, so the modder is on far more shaky ground including URD who are part of it via signing off on the tyres.
How you can moralise when you rip from ACC is laughable.
You just talk dribble, URD can't even stop sites giving their stuff away for free, this literal thread has ACC cars and track rips being shared, this is GTplanet as in Gran Turismo, which has people sharing out GT rips again of tracks and cars.
And nothing, happens.

To be clear then, the chap with the Bentley he ripped from ACC including its physics, he said "The rest of the physics is ACC based....." so then locks away the ripped model and ripped physic's...
And gets his gang involved in calling out others who might dare to go into the data file of the ripped mod.....
Actual wow. Just beyond anything before and I've seen a lot on here...

Whole thread devoted to messing with cars and tracks and somehow everyone is quiet and I'm the bad one.....

If people ripping ACC tracks and cars is acceptable how is fair that you think you can warn me about anything?
That whole Bentley is stolen off 505 games IP, real IP not some made up IP by some kid in his basement.

Might send them an email tomorrow.
I never said that you shouldn't look into the data files xD
You just ignore my sentences..
I showed my reason for the encryption multiple times and you still say that I want to lock them away..
I JUST want that the car has 1 version with all bug fixes in it, not 5 fixed addon files for the car all over the internet
Is that so hard to understand?
Feel free to look into the files and use them if you want to xD

And why do you want to send 505 games an email?
I mean GTP ripped the mod too as well as many others.
The only reason why AC is still alive are Mod conversions out of other games.
Without that you can close this thread😅
 
Hello every one, I need help, I tryed different PPF, and Im seeing that some instrument panels of the cars looks a bit dark, when the sun light is directly on this, even when the car is in the shadows, is there some CSP or Assetto Corsa video setting to avoid this effect? thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_renault__clio_v6_2001_glava-zete_16-3-123-23-22-22.jpg
    Screenshot_renault__clio_v6_2001_glava-zete_16-3-123-23-22-22.jpg
    105.3 KB · Views: 18
  • Screenshot_renault__clio_v6_2001_glava-zete_16-3-123-23-22-1.jpg
    Screenshot_renault__clio_v6_2001_glava-zete_16-3-123-23-22-1.jpg
    133 KB · Views: 18
I'm sorry to interrupt this (fair and old) debate on encryption but can you point me to the best visual version of Long Beach... I've taken a look on the Breathe list but I can't understand how does it work proper 😅. Also, he reported a version from a dude called "fn" which is maybe the most recent one but there isn't a download link...
Download links are present but as mentionned on my update posts :

PS : The icon for the track links disapeared but all the links are always presents. I am busy putting them back but it takes time
 
The only reason why AC is still alive are Mod conversions out of other games.
Without that you can close this thread😅
Without wanting to fuel this anymore, it was the other guy making threats to me about what URD will do to me for talking about possibly using their tyres.ini without asking them first.

All the while the car we are talking about is ripped from ACC.

In fairness you have been nothing be polite and courteous.
Lets draw a line.

I just hope you read the bit you wrote that i bolded, and see at least some irony in encryption though....
 
Last edited:
One night pass and the trainwreck is even better.
Gosh that is epic.
Stealers warning stealers how they will sue them for stealing their steal.

Judge Judy No GIF by Agent M Loves Gifs

as lost as your other friend, i stated that solely for the urd content used here. if you cant read that between the lines, shouldnt even comment in the first place. he got perms to use them and thats what matters, not where the car is, which origin it has or some other ass pulled bs you come up with. chem is doing his thing what and how he likes to, he helps me in my doing aswell, both on acc ports and urd mods. doesnt matter which circumstance, he got perms to use that stuff no matter what, or where beeing used.

You have admitted that the Bentley is from ACC including the physics, so the modder is on far more shaky ground including URD who are part of it via signing off on the tyres.
How you can moralise when you rip from ACC is laughable.
You just talk dribble, URD can't even stop sites giving their stuff away for free, this literal thread has ACC cars and track rips being shared, this is GTplanet as in Gran Turismo, which has people sharing out GT rips again of tracks and cars.
And nothing, happens.

To be clear then, the chap with the Bentley he ripped from ACC including its physics, he said "The rest of the physics is ACC based....." so then locks away the ripped model and ripped physic's...
And gets his gang involved in calling out others who might dare to go into the data file of the ripped mod.....
Actual wow. Just beyond anything before and I've seen a lot on here...

Whole thread devoted to messing with cars and tracks and somehow everyone is quiet and I'm the bad one.....
Everyone looks away, stays silent lets bonny who rips ACC models get on his high horse.

If people ripping ACC tracks and cars is acceptable how is fair that you think you can warn me about anything?
That whole Bentley is stolen off 505 games IP, real IP not some made up IP by some kid in his basement.

Might send them an email tomorrow.

lost case aswell, same thing said, only concerning urd assets. i dont even care about where acc ports are from, its obvious and accepted at this place. remember all those mods that came from the gtp modding team, which are all from acc, mind typing a mail for all those aswell? or mind you typing a mail to ferrari for using masterkeys acc port in their trailer, or dinamic for using crashs acc port for a livery showcase on their official socials? no. should we head out to sms to tell them what youre doing? guess they wouldnt be as happy to hear that. and putting yourself into a position trying to be a victim all of a sudden, but for certain haveing all of the cars and ports you listed on your ssd just shows crazy inconsistancy in every word youre telling. judgeing people for using models of a game, but doing the same aint beeing dumb is it? got better to do then looking at this burning place again, a 992 is waiting for a better fate...
 
90 percent of AC users won't go all detective like a modder can.
Same as when i went into Tommy 78's sierra RS500 mod recently to take some bits for my RS500 PCars conversion.....
Guess what...... Tommy's is PCars RS500.
OK so he did some stuff to it, but he claims scratch made I believe and charges money.
Tommy's mods are not worth any money anyway. That's just cements it even more. Hell, even for free they're not that great. Not to mention, that I always had a feeling that his mods are not 100% scratch made.
 
Last edited:
@CrisT86 i want to release the beta of Spa 83 by the end of the week. it is based off the 1988 version which in turn features your config etc.
Go ahead, no problem at all from my side, you're more than welcome to use my config. Hope it will be done well and it doesen't need my rework (i have too much tracks to update yet for another one in list :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:)
 
as lost as your other friend, i stated that solely for the urd content used here. if you cant read that between the lines, shouldnt even comment in the first place. he got perms to use them and thats what matters, not where the car is, which origin it has or some other ass pulled bs you come up with. chem is doing his thing what and how he likes to, he helps me in my doing aswell, both on acc ports and urd mods. doesnt matter which circumstance, he got perms to use that stuff no matter what, or where beeing used.



lost case aswell, same thing said, only concerning urd assets. i dont even care about where acc ports are from, its obvious and accepted at this place. remember all those mods that came from the gtp modding team, which are all from acc, mind typing a mail for all those aswell? or mind you typing a mail to ferrari for using masterkeys acc port in their trailer, or dinamic for using crashs acc port for a livery showcase on their official socials? no. should we head out to sms to tell them what youre doing? guess they wouldnt be as happy to hear that. and putting yourself into a position trying to be a victim all of a sudden, but for certain haveing all of the cars and ports you listed on your ssd just shows crazy inconsistancy in every word youre telling. judgeing people for using models of a game, but doing the same aint beeing dumb is it? got better to do then looking at this burning place again, a 992 is waiting for a better fate...
Pretty sure my dad is stronger than your's, at least mentally :gtpflag:
 
as lost as your other friend, i stated that solely for the urd content used here. if you cant read that between the lines, shouldnt even comment in the first place. he got perms to use them and thats what matters, not where the car is, which origin it has or some other ass pulled bs you come up with. chem is doing his thing what and how he likes to, he helps me in my doing aswell, both on acc ports and urd mods. doesnt matter which circumstance, he got perms to use that stuff no matter what, or where beeing used.
You didn't followed the subject, do you ?
Lets wrap it up quickly :
Modding (in general) = barely legal, for many different reasons. Has become more and more tolerated/accepted/endorsed by game companies for the gain in popularity and longevity of their products. Still on the line, many lawsuits, rarely in the modders favor.
Converting = definitely illegal, on a copyright property side especially, would be still tolerated on a private side, a little less on a public side.
Selling = without a permit for the sell and a licence for the copyright, absolutely illegal, straight to jail, not even a need for a lawsuit in 99% of the countries in the world. And it's the same for Patreon paywares, except a little more countries are not "on the page" on that (I'm looking at you, Ireland)
Encrypting = definitely illegal if the content (and I mean, ALL of it) is not your property in the first place, because it trigger the concept of ownership and copyrighting. Not in the legal form, but on the moral form. That's what is so "hated" about encryption, it's the nature of it, the meaning of the action. Defendable in the face of a jury, maybe, but that's all.

So, coming here, aggressively threatening someone on his action and defending yourself on a "he got perms to use that stuff" (good for him) while talking about a encrypted conversion... I mean... I cannot be the only one laughting.

I apologize if you felt attacked, that wasn't the point. The point was : will you start to understand how grotesque this is becoming ?

Just stop, take it easy, apologize to Safi for the aggressivity and keep on going. We, as a whole, have the right to desagree with each other on the use of a tool and explaining why. It's a debate. And if after that you and Chem keep on encrypting your content, good for you, get on with it, you're free. That wont stop us to enjoy your creations, and thanking you for it.
 
Sharing a mod? Host it on GTPlanet Downloads. Free, public hosting for files up to 10GB in size.
Back