- 9,058
- Murica
- BasedAckbar
Well my wishes were granted, don't need GT5 now.
It was actually bought by a designing company called bathing ape, who only done it for a publicity stunt.![]()
Any car can be used as a daily driver, practicality varies but you can use an Ariel Atom (tube frame with wheels and an engine) as a daily driver and some people do. To say the Veyron isn't impressive because other cars can go fast and be used daily is missing the point. Because the point of the Veyron is that it goes as fast as it does and it provides superior levels of comfort, luxury and presitge. At 250mph the Veyron is as smooth as a Bentley at 50, the Callaway is not. It's loud, vibrating like mad and skittish, now some people want that, fair enough but some prefer the comfort and the presige that owning a car like the Veyron provides. It's not everyones cup of tea but as a feat of engineerinng the Veyron is right up there. The reliability, the comfort, the power, speed, prestige, it has it all and not just to some degree, to a very high if not even benchmark setting degree. The Callaway doesn't.I'm not arguing the comfort differences Mclaren, as I know the Veyron is more comfortable than my own home, all I'm saying is the Sledgehammer can also be used for daily driving. Will it be as comfortable and luxurious as a Veyron? No way in hell, just like a Toyota Corolla to a Bentley Continental. A person can drive a Toyota to work, just as much as driving a Bentley, the same goes for the Sledgehammer and the Veyron.
Your really sad Famine.
I admire the veyron for its engineering, but i also detest it for its focus on top speed. Its already a cliche, but then cliches are often true. Its just faaaaaaaarr...faaaaaaar too heavy. Remember the top gear drag race? even in a straight line, its not actually as fast as it seems versus other hypercars. Beating out a mclaren F1 over an entire mile by a mere fraction of a second- what if it were the F1 LM, or the GT? the gap would be even smaller, or the mclaren would have won.
In short its deserving of its hypercar status, but i suspect that many many other hypercars are faster around a track and less compromised by weight. i dont hold it in such high regard as others for this reason.
Read earlier threads of mine and you will understand about that race.![]()
For the record the Veyron has caned a Saleen S7 TT in a drag race, it anhialted a Pagani Zonda F and in other tests it has obliterated the F1's times. It also beat the Ferrari Enzo on the only recorded competetive lap that I have seen and I've looked. If you bog downa powerful 4wd car at launch you really do hamper the early acceleration, personally I think TopGear did it on purpose to dramatise the race. They do it all the time. You can't take that race as gospel, the only tests they do properly are the ones they backup with numbers like the power laps. The rest is just entertainment. The Veyron really is as fast as it is made out to be. If you line he Veyron and McLaren F1 up and let the McLaren go first giving it a headstart until it reached 100mph then the Veyron went, it be in with a shout of reaching 200mph before the F1. That is not a close race.
I don't dissagree that it more than probably doesn't handle as well as an Atom, but I also think that it is a much faster car than the F1 despite it's weight. Probably faster on a track too but that's just my opinion.
![]()
Sorry to interrupt the argument, but that's what I hope a Veyron would look like in GT5 after plowing it.
Imagine the insurance claim on that!
I'd be so pissed...my brother would better leave the island if he did that.
I would've sold him to cover the insurance repairs