...What's this thing about Thor 3 teaser popping out on Civil War screenings? I certainly didn't see it. Anyone else saw it?
Do I need to youtube it now?
Speaking of Crossbones, slightly underused, but he seems able to survive a lot. How about that cauliflower ear though? Eesh.
There isn't one, unless they mean thewhat Ross said about Hulk
Got back a while ago, had some lunch, and now I'm ready. Right off the bat, I have to address the elephant in the room and ask:
Was that or was that not the Bleeding Edge armor? It looked a little too much like it (with freedoms taking here and there) but I was nerding out throughout wondering just whether or not it was supposed to be.
Moving on, this was certainly different and not in the bad way. The presentation and the location title cards made it feel like something out of Ocean's 11 for a good portion of the first act, hell throughout the entire movie really - and that's not a criticism on my part because I love O11. I had a real appreciation for how things ultimately came together only to fall apart soon after, but I never really chose a side because both had legitimate points being made.
Stark is conflicted and driven by the guilt he's been shouldering for the longest of time, these people with their unparalleled gifts are putting lives in danger all in the name of protecting them in the first place. When it's all said and done however they'll all just get up and walk away, more or less. Rogers feels it's their burden to bear and no one else; the good ol' Spock philosophy - the needs of many outweigh the needs of the few. It's a bit crass when uttered but it's the sad true because you won't be able to save everyone all the time, and the second you let that creep on you and let it waiver your judgment no one is saved.
More to my point, I never chose a side because I just wanted to see these guys fight it out. Daniel Bruhl played his role pretty damn well, but my criticism of his use is the same of Vision's in AoU: there just isn't enough of him. I get he's playing the role of puppeteer, but I wish things were a little more open to what was going on. I don't know. Maybe I'm saying because I went in completely forgetting that Zemo was in the movie, because I definitely did that. Either way I'm rambling because I'm still hyped up a bit, so let's get to the bullet points.
There was just a bit too much going on for a first viewing so I'll see it again and put things together a little bit better.
- Best portrayal of the Web-head to date. Really played up on his early teenage personality, hell, even his personality in his adult years (Peter honestly and truthfully doesn't mature very much under the mask ).
- Please have Bucky and Falcon talk more. Please?
- I love that they made light of the fact that Aunt May was attractive for someone you're expecting to be older.
- Paul Rudd. More of him, please.
- Vision wearing normal clothing and trying to fit in. Also the chemistry between him and Scarlet is there and I love it.
- When Bucky is initially found and the whole fight scene in the complex happens, it instantly reminded me of Daredevil.
- Black Panther. Another perfect casting choice in Boseman. The accent was on point too.
- The battle between Stark, Steve and Bucky was about as tense and personal as something like that can be. That's the kind of battle where you switch sides with every punch thrown.
@FoolKiller:
On your Sides point, true, but Vision did have a point. World ending catastrophes did increase significantly since Stark outed himself as Iron Man a little over eight years ago.
But only those caused by Stark himself or by aliens.
CAFA - Johann Schmidt/Red Skull - but predates Stark
IM1 - Obadiah Stane, using Stark's suit and arc reactor technology - but predates Stark's announcement
Hulk - Hulk, made by Bruce Banner.
IM2 - Ivan Vanko, using Stark's suit and arc reactor technology
Thor - The Destroyer (alien), made by Odin (alien), sent by Loki (alien)
IM3 - Aldrich Killian and Ten Rings, looking for personal revenge on Stark
AA - Loki (alien) and the Chitauri (alien) under the direction of Thanos (alien)
TDW - Laufey (alien) and the Aether (Infinity Stone - alien)
CAWS - Hydra, a centuries old organisation based around an Inhuman god created by the Kree (alien), predating Stark's announcement
AoU - Ultron, created by Stark, using an AI found in Loki's (alien) staff as given to him by Thanos (alien)
Ant Man - No threat to the world.
CACW - No threat to the world, but the first act of revenge against the Avengers themselves.
GotG - No threat to the world. Also aliens.
Given that the destruction in AA was caused by aliens as part of an alien feud and limited by the Avengers, while the destruction in AoU was caused by an alien AI unleashed by Stark, it seems a bit off that the incredibly overpowered Scarlet Witch (who was created by the alien-founded Hydra with the use of an alien artefact) can accidentally relocate a suicide bomber into a location that kills some different people than the ones he would have killed had he exploded in the marketplace and then become a focal point for 'control the Avengers'.
So Vision's point really is that Tony Stark needs to be controlled, as do aliens and maybe his girlfriend who can increase his density at a whim. But then Vision himself was created by Tony Stark and an Infinity Stone (alien)...
Then that brings into question who really led the Avengers up to that point.
Do keep in mind that Adam Warlock hasn't formally made his MCU appearance yet.@Famine when you look at it like that the whole movie falls apart LOL.
Too much paprika clouding Vision's senses maybe.
Which gems have yet to be discovered or introduced into the MCU? Soul and Time? I wonder whether one of these will be the Eye of Agamotto that Doctor Strange wears around his neck. But the advance publicity I've heard about that movie suggests that it's all about alternate dimensions which sounds like the Aethyr again.
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/How-Doctor-Strange-Completely-Change-Marvel-Universe-69001.html
Ew. Just ew. If that's what they were trying to do, then I think everyone is going to hope that they failed.I thought the film makers tried to inseminate the idea
Yep.Let's be honest about who, if anyone, is at fault.
Only Stark purposely became a hero out of arrogance and then publicly announced, "Come at me, bro," twice.
Thanos was coming either way. The Kree/Hydra issues are ancient and always been behind the scenes. If The Avengers had a role in any of their stuff, it was to bring it to light and expose the conspiracy.
Ross is doing what Ross always does, poke a fire too powerful to control for his own selfish ends.
Ultimately, if the Avengers weren't present and sitting in a compound waiting to be deployed, or just non-existent, what would the fallout truly be? We'd be enslaved by Thanos and New York would be a wasteland of smoldering ash. Anything that can be purely blamed on Avengers was Stark acting on his own, against the team's wishes, and often in secret.
Stark is the vigilante. It's the warning Fury has given him from the beginning.
Ew. Just ew. If that's what they were trying to do, then I think everyone is going to hope that they failed.
As far as I'm aware, Loki merely impersonated Odin in front of Thor. I'm sure we'll find out in Ragnarok.@Famine Does Odin have an Infinity stone? didn't Loki Kill him and take his place in Thor 2?
I know what you meant. You just used the word "inseminate", which was a pretty poor choice.I don't quite get what you mean here. What do you mean everyone??
Thanos is a known issue in the galaxy. He is attempting to stay behind the scenes to keep attention down. His goals would be far more difficult if he had Nova Corps, the Kree, and Asgard interfering with him.On the topic and beyond the remit of Civil War so not needing spoiler tags
Thanos has an Infinity Gauntlet and desires the Infinity Stones. Thus far we've seen four:
Power Stone - Stored on a planet at the start of Guardians in unknown circumstances, now in the possession of Nova Corps
Reality Stone - Aether, stored on Earth by Bor of Asgard, now in possession of the Tivan the Collector
Space Stone - Tesseract, stored on Earth by Odin of Asgard, now in possession of Odin
Mind Stone - Loki's staff, already in the possession of Thanos and given to Loki in Avengers Assemble, now in possession of Vision
Now... I don't get why, if Thanos is collecting the Infinity Stones, he happily surrenders one to Loki. Now you might say that he's given one to Loki without telling him what it is so that Loki can retrieve the Tesseract and bring him the Space Stone, to double his stone count but...
Loki activates the Space Stone to create a wormhole remotely.
He uses the Mind Stone to build himself a small human army with the ultimate goal of using the Space Stone to create another wormhole to bring the Chitauri army through to conquer Earth. As soon as the Tesseract is deactivated, the wormhole closes.
So how does Thanos expect to get either of his two Stones back again? He could come through with the Chitauri army, but then he'd be stuck on Earth. Unless he could use the Space Stone to make a wormhole back again that he could take the Tesseract through with him, but if he could, why did Loki not do that right at the start - and for that matter why does he even need Loki anyway? They knew where the Space Stone was and could activate it remotely at any time.
Since then he's not tried to get either Stone back, or get his hands on the other two - and though Tivan might be working for Thanos, it seems likely that Tivan is working for Tivan.
I know what you meant. You just used the word "inseminate", which was a pretty poor choice.
The “joke” about Civil War is that it’s implausible to think that the federal government would act to regulate deadly weapons in the wake of the deaths of school children. The allusion to events like the Sandy Hook shooting are obvious, and it perpetuates this reading of Civil War as an argument about gun control. The problem is that it ascribes a substance to the politics of Civil War that the text simply doesn’t substantiate. The book itself does beg this reading, but that’s a context that actually illuminates the comic’s fatal flaws.
Most people I know prefer the movie canon better than the comics because the political alignment on the character has their own reasons instead of being hamfisted, It has less number of characters involved than the comics but gain more focus, more wit than edgy, and overall its feels like a comic storyline patched by the movie directors by quite large.So the AV Club did a roundtable discussion on the Civil War comic, and right off the bat I got a good chuckle:
The comic that was so ham-fistedly obviously a parallel to the Bush Administration's policies and the likes of Guantanamo and War on Terror and etc. that people rolled their eyes at it was actually about gun control all along, because there are obvious allusions to an event that happened half a decade later. And unfortunately, it's just not a very good commentary on the gun control debate that it obviously is supposed to be.
Moving on, this was certainly different and not in the bad way. The presentation and the location title cards made it feel like something out of Ocean's 11 for a good portion of the first act, hell throughout the entire movie really - and that's not a criticism on my part because I love O11. I had a real appreciation for how things ultimately came together only to fall apart soon after, but I never really chose a side because both had legitimate points being made.
Giant Man was pretty awesome, but Lang wasn't thinking like Ant Man. He was stuck in a big mindset. He could have been much more effective if he would go normal the moment they tried tying him up. He'd just step out of the web and Stark and Rhodes would have collided. As Ant Man he went big and small as needed. He needs to think that way as Giant Man.
It also seems a massive waste to have such a huge fight primarily revolve around Bucky only to stick him in the ice cube tray all over again.