Alright, these soil tests have been done by a (biologist it was?), in America, who has been noticing a significant increase of the so called chemtrails and with them a significant increase of various metals and other substances in the soil. The really interesting part here is that he and others allegedly tested Aluminuim amounts of particles in the air (soil too?), which are 15.000, yes, 15.000 times higher than the "normal" amount of particles. Now if that is true, there is no way these numbers are the result of "natural or accidental" pollution, at least it does not make sence to me. Some also tested snow and water in mountain regions, where heavy spraying has been spotted and there these extreme numbers have also been found.
Hopefully we can find these test results in a properly documented fashion and replicate all of his results. However, I can make a wild guess at what else could be a cause of this. I wonder if he tested for mercury too because in many US states and countries around the world they have legislated that compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs) must be use in place of incandescent bulbs. An issue has come about this where there is a concern of the mercury in these bulbs causing pollution. It is currently not a verified real concern, but
it is out there. "But they aren't talking about mercury." Of course not, that can be directly linked to pollution very easily. It doesn't fit the theory. However, in those same bulbs you have:
Phosphor in a CFL is a phosphate mix that may contain manganese, rare elements such as lanthanum, and yttrium as either an oxide or a phosphate, along with a barium/aluminum oxide. Phosphor components may vary slightly depending on the color of the lamp.
.
You can read the full contents of that article
here (PDF). Now, if the mercury pollution is enough to raise some concerns and many places require
only CFL use, why would we not expect to see barium and aluminum as well? Or if mercury is in all kinds of places due to industrial pollution, including to the point where wild caught fish, like salmon, are considered a possible risk factor what industrial processes are also using barium and aluminum and causing similar pollution? That would even explain snow and water in mountain regions. Heck, since the fish in those same waters is supposedly laden with mercury it seems almost likely or expected in some cases.
Again though, this is all just speculation.
Now to the lungs, as far as I know, "chemtrail-believers" did not test anybody or themselfes concerning the lungs and barium but I read several times that the...ugh what was that...it was some American health center thing?lol, well it was a governmental health institution sth., which has all the statistics concerning health of Americans obviously and they stated that respiratory deseases in the last, I believe it were 15 years, increased by 3000%. Oh and yeah they concluded the source must come from the air the people breath, how they concluded it, don't know. I really find it hard to believe this could ONLY have been caused by industrial or traffic pollution. Also, this would fit in the "theory" or observation that siginificant spraying in America started around 1998 and in Europe in 2003.
1998? I graduated from high school and started college in 1997 and when I was a small child I though the contrails were exhaust from Buck Rogers style spaceships, and then when I was old enough to know they were planes I thought it was exhaust. I didn't realize it was contrails until I was old enough to understand the physics behind them. I see where comments of testing before were made, but was the testing as common as the actual spraying being done today? Or were they mostly contrails then and now suddenly all chemtrails. That just doesn't make any sense.
As for respiratory disease rates in the last 15 years:
From the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), quoting the Centers for Disease Control (CDC):
Decrease in bronchitis, and a fairly steady rate of emphysema.
Age-adjusted for all COPD:
Odd, from the dates this stuff supposedly started from there is a mostly across the board decrease. And COPD is the 4th greatest health killer in the US. [sarcasm]Maybe the spray is actually a cure? Evil Scum![/sarcasm]
Now, notice there is a note that a change in testing occurred in '98. So, maybe they are using some old form of statistical data that shows the similar increase as we see before the division line on the chart. But that is not the process being used by any medical group studying respiratory disease today. So we are left with either trusting these "scientists" whose best publications are You Tube videos without peer review, or the rest of the scientific community that specializes in respiratory disease. Anyway, of the governmental agencies that would have this information, there is no documented 3000% increase, unless they are nit picking out one bit of data, but the various forms of COPD are most commonly due to smoking and/or pollution.
Wait, I forgot lung cancer, the deadliest form of all cancers in all people.
According to the
CDC:
In the United States, incidence of lung cancer has—
* Decreased significantly by 1.8% per year from 1991 to 2006 among men.
* Increased significantly by 0.4% per year from 1991 to 2006 among women.
* Decreased significantly by 1.8% per year from 1997 to 2006 among white men.
* Increased significantly by 0.2% per year from 1997 to 2006 among white women.
* Decreased significantly by 2.7% per year from 1997 to 2006 among African American men.
* Remained level from 1997 to 2006 among African American women.
* Decreased significantly by 3.2% per year from 1997 to 2006 among American Indians/Alaska Native men.
* Remained level from 1997 to 2006 among American Indians/Alaska Native women.
* Decreased significantly by 2.0% per year from 1997 to 2006 among Asian/Pacific Islander men.
* Remained level from 1997 to 2006 among Asian/Pacific Islander women.
* Decreased significantly by 2.5% per year from 1997 to 2006 among Hispanic men.
* Decreased significantly by 0.7% per year from 1997 to 2006 among Hispanic women.
Hurm...
I know, Asthma. Back to the
CDC.:
Results: From 1980 to 1996, 12-month asthma prevalence increased both in counts and rates, but no discernable change was identified in asthma attack estimates since 1997 or in current asthma prevalence from 2001 to 2004. During the period of increasing prevalence, patient encounters (office visits, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, and hospitalizations) for asthma increased. However, rates for these encounters, when based on the population with asthma, did not increase. Although the rate of asthma deaths increased during 1980--1995, the rate of deaths has decreased each year since 2000.
OK, at this point I have no clue what respiratory disease you are referring to. I have listed the most common ones, some of which are also some of the most common diseases in general in the US, and it is all decreases in the time frame that this chemtrail spraying supposedly began. All I can tell you is that whoever told you that was lying. Why would they do that?
Better yet, why would you trust anything else they state after that?
But really, I deserve it. To my justification though: I admited somewhere earlier in this threat that it was stupid of me, because..well...it was stupid.
