Uhh... That version of the 3.8 has been around a LONG time. In '85 In was introduced into the new FWD Regency 98 and Electra/Park Ave. It offered Sequential fuel injection, and a distributor-less ignition. It wasnt a power house, with around 150-160 hp and around 200 ft lbs of torque. This was essentially the series one, which ran all the way until '94-'96. The S/C version came around '91-'92 and had 205hp. The Series II replaced it, with N/A versions having 200-205hp, and the S/C versions having 240hp. This was obviously different from the 3.8 that was used in the Grand National. That engine has old, old roots.Jmac279And what is the age difference ?
IIRC, the 3800 V6 was used in the Chevrolet Camaro starting in 1995 ... The current 2.2 liter, 240 hp S2000 engine came out this year (although the original 2 liter also made 240 hp in 1999) ...
Now also take into account that the 3800 V6 was the "ghetto" engine of the Camaro ... Then take into account that the S2000 is a SPORTS CAR and the vehicles in which the 3800 are currently found are definitely not (Monte Carlo, Impala, Grand Prix, Bonneville, LeSabre, LaCrosse) ... In these cars, GM isn't so much concerned about making the most power possible, but making a decently powerful, comfortable vehicle ...
ZardozThe NA car list contains, as best as I can tell after two counts, the following by-nation breakdown:
451 Japanese
90 German
62 American
40 British
29 Italian
29 French
5 Australian
5 Korean
2 Swedish
1 Dutch
1 Spanish
I am sorry, but this is one of the biggest loads of crap I have ever read online, and as we all know there is a lot of crap online.r8manAmerican cars are just fine. They are more reliable than alot of japanese cars and there is no way to compare japanese and american cars.
ZardozFrom the official Sony GT4 web site:
Just one from the great old Can-Am series, and they had to pick the freak: The Chaparral sucker car that entered (and failed to finish) just two races.
Jmac279No they didn't, they just placed it at the bottom of the list instead of with the rest of the Nissans for some odd reason ...
Cluns1414Some of you guys think the number of American cars justifies everything. The ratio of cars from different countries(in this case, American)to the Japanese cars is only half of it. The rest is simply about misrepresentation. Honestly, years from now what do you think is going to be a better representation of American ingenuity...a Pontiac Sunfire or Corvette C6 Z06? A Pontiac Vibe or Mustang Cobra GT? Its just not the numbers, its the dumb choices they made. Regardless this game is going to be the best simulator to date......but it could have been even better if they had made a few simple changes. As for the licensing red tape, i don't know anything about that, maybe that could have had something to do with it.
To be honest with you, i dont care if the American Car number was half that, aslong as they were the right ones.........
Ha, I wasn't really countering your argument, just trying to clarify. I even stated that there wasnt really a point to my post, other then an engines age or design shouldnt really matter.Jmac279So you counter my argument by basically saying everything I just said ?
Yeah, who gives a damn if they use leaf springs, as long as they work.Cluns1414It's tradition and who cares if the C6 Z06 uses leaf springs when it can pull the same numbers as a Ferrari F430. People can bash the leaf springs all they want, but it doesn't stop the fact that this car out handles and out preforms any car in its price range. Even Hammond of Top Gear known for his brute honesty says that leaf springs are out dated, but then he goes on to say that it "corners like a dream".
Jmac279Evidence ?
Because every major reliability database seems to disagree with you (Consumer Reports, Lemon-Aid, J.D. Power, etc.)
As far as I know, the C6 ZO6 isn't even out yet ...Cluns1414It's tradition and who cares if the C6 Z06 uses leaf springs when it can pull the same numbers as a Ferrari F430. People can bash the leaf springs all they want, but it doesn't stop the fact that this car out handles and out preforms any car in its price range. Even Hammond of Top Gear known for his brute honesty says that leaf springs are out dated, but then he goes on to say that it "corners like a dream".
Available fall 2005.
Jedi2016That wasn't my point. He listed the C6 as an example of "inginuity", when it clearly has components that are anything but new.
I just don't see why you guys are making such a fuss about ONE car. You guys seem so pissed about ONE car that you're completely forgetting the seven hundred and twenty-two cars that ARE in the game.
Cluns1414Are you really going to bother racing an s600 or a motorized carridge, or any other extremely underpowerd primitive cars for fun?
All in all, its just a game and im not going to get all emotional over it.
Jedi2016Hell, yeah, I will. I'll probably be driving these so-called "underpowered" cars more than I will the race cars. There's more to driving than brute power, you know. And not everyone is going to be driving only the fastest cars in the game. Fact is, of all the cars in my garage (my current "wish list" has around 150), maybe one or two will have ANY tuning done to them. I have very little interest in driving the Super-Ultra-Mega-Lightning version of an otherwise normal road car. I mean, what's the point? After dumping a hundred thousand credits into a car, it's not even the same car anymore. So you're not really driving a Skyline or a Mustang.. you're driving a souped-up race car that just happens to look like a Skyline or Mustang. What's the fun in that? Just give me the stock version, I'll be happy.
Jmac279How is a pushrod engine "older" technology ?
The first Rotary engine was made in 1893 ...
The first SOHC engine was made in 1898 ...
The first DOHC engine was made in 1906 ...
The first OHV Pushrod engine was made in 1902 ...
WOW ! The DOHC design is only 99 years old and while the OHV Pushrod design is MUCH MUCH older at 103 years old !
And did you ever once think that it might be related to cost and design philosophy ?
Also, Pushrods tend to be superior for low-RPM power, which is right in line with GM's design philosophy ...
Jedi2016As for American inginuity.. you might have picked some better examples... The 'Vette C6 with it's leaf-spring suspension... the Mustang GT with it's live rear axle. They're nice cars and all, but it would have been nice to at least use twentieth-century technology. They had leaf-springs and live axles a thousand years ago.
They had a 5.7 liter DOHC V8 in the ZR-1 that was widely praised ... But because of the high cost to produce the engine (thus lower profits), the C5 performance Corvette (Z06) went back to a more traditional Pushrod engine ...OnlyzoneOlder by the fact that GM hasn't changed all of their engines over to DOHC as apposed to the Japanese brands.
Yes the reason GM hasn't changed over is because of costs and the fact that its more complicated. OHV assemblies have less parts to break and weigh less.