There's enough wealth in the USA for them to ride it out without needing to risk people by opening up businesses and schools four months too early.
Ha! That isn't how successful capitalist nations work!
There's enough wealth in the USA for them to ride it out without needing to risk people by opening up businesses and schools four months too early.
Don't tell me that!A stainless steel table surface is like 7 days
As of yesterday..........USA might want to do the census next year or whenever the virus runs its course for the year. There's going to be less people for sure by then.
If it weren't for our Governors stepping in with the shutdowns we'd really be up sh creek. And thanks must go to Dr. Brix and Fauci and the team, even somewhat Pence. Without them Trump would be damned along with the rest of us. Trump believes nobody including the virus team, obviously. How could a President think people would be stealing masks? C'mon man WTF? Find your own facts (weed thru the mess) and don't rely on others for the truth, most others have their own agenda/spin, that's life. Help those in the health care field helping us if you can. #StayhomeStaysafe
The last time I checked, it was reported that 66 Italian doctors have died so far due to the novel coronavirus. I am assuming that this is a major change. In addition, there have been many more health care professionals who have become seriously sick but have survived.
Lengthy article on BBC website explaining - or trying to - the reason for widely differing mortality rates:
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200401-coronavirus-why-death-and-mortality-rates-differ
Well... businesses aren't people, and protecting people is the key reason for these temporary rules. There's enough wealth in the USA for them to ride it out without needing to risk people by opening up businesses and schools four months too early. Any other course of action looks like it's putting business wealth ahead of personal well-being, that's not a good situation.
US unemployment claims hit record high
A record 6.6 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits last week, official figures show.
It surpasses the previous week's record high of nearly 3.3 million.
For context, the previous record of 695,000 was set in 1982.
It comes as officials in states across the country have closed restaurants, bars, cinemas, hotels and gyms in an effort to slow the spread of the virus.
I’m not sure governments had any other option than the “kick the can down the road approach”. Imagine if they would have come out of the gate and said, “folks, we are going to issues a 3 month Stay at Home measure, enforceable by law.” I think people would have lost their minds, and society would have crumbled.Doctors have been dying to care for people since doctors were a thing. And lots of professions risk their lives. It's wonderful and great that they exist, and I'm inspired by the human heart, and it's not unique to healthcare.
See below. This can cause more deaths than COVID-19, and can do it globally as well.
Edit:
Also, to be clear, I'm complaining about the "kick the can down the road" process here. Not specifically any measures, but they way they're being rolled out.
Or they could have given a three month stay at home order and the world could just grow up a little, but that's asking too much right?I’m not sure governments had any other option than the “kick the can down the road approach”. Imagine if they would have come out of the gate and said, “folks, we are going to issues a 3 month Stay at Home measure, enforceable by law.” I think people would have lost their minds, and society would have crumbled.
I don’t like the “kick the can” approach, and yes it leaves officials open to criticism, but I honestly don’t think there was another option.
Are you familiar with the world we live in?Or they could have given a three month stay at home order and the world could just grow up a little, but that's asking too much right?
I’m not sure governments had any other option than the “kick the can down the road approach”. Imagine if they would have come out of the gate and said, “folks, we are going to issues a 3 month Stay at Home measure, enforceable by law.” I think people would have lost their minds, and society would have crumbled.
I don’t like the “kick the can” approach, and yes it leaves officials open to criticism, but I honestly don’t think there was another option.
There's enough wealth in the USA for them to ride it out without needing to risk people by opening up businesses and schools four months too early.
There is, but short of forcibly taking the money from them, most of which isn't liquid, there's not really much the government can do.
And also, the most recent bailout was what... $2T? So if we round up 2,000 billionaires and take $1B from each of them (and it exists... not having been destroyed in the market), causing them to fire sale stocks (like Amazon) and causing companies to get bought in hostile stock takeovers (like Amazon getting bought by Apple), and take that $2T and give it to everyone....
How long is that going to last?
It'd probably look something like this to the people who want forced wealth redistribution:
I agree with you, but I still believe that the US as a whole would not have tolerated a 3 month shut down announced at the beginning of March. It would have required police and/or military force to enforce (we may still get to that point), and I think it would have caused the US to devolve into a state of civil unrest, possibly even open conflict.I think there was, and I think there is, and I think this is not an excuse for them.
My schools, my city, my state, told me they were shut for 2 weeks, resuming in March... then they moved it to April 17, now it's April 30. So what confidence do I have in this number?
How about make a real estimate... say April 20. Or even say June whatever. And then announce "we'll lift it sooner if it goes well". Even that tiny bit would be a huge improvement. It would focus planning, reduce panic, reduce malinvestment...
If you tell me "look we're shut till June", I'd already have hired someone and have them working in my house, and I'd be back to full time, not losing vacation, not stringing along my job, and I'd spend the money (and employ someone). The kick the can thing is awful.
Yes. Sour, harsh medicines are administered in the smallest possible quantities!I agree with you, but I still believe that the US as a whole would not have tolerated a 3 month shut down announced at the beginning of March. It would have required police and/or military force to enforce (we may still get to that point), and I think it would have caused the US to devolve into a state of civil unrest, possibly even open conflict.
Governments announced a 2 week shutdown, and people have had a hard enough time accepting that. 3 months out of the gate would have sent people over be edge.
Personally I don't care so long as someone does something.I'm curious if any polls like this have been taking in other states and how they compare:
Utahns trust state government more than the feds to deal with coronavirus pandemic
Utahns, and more specifically Mormons, are notoriously anti-federal government since they went to war with Utah in the 1800s. So, it doesn't surprise me that the state government is getting more props for handling the situation than the federal government. But it would be interesting to see how other states were polling. My guess is that for the most part, people would trust their local government over the feds, but I have no idea.
Gravitas: Wuhan Coronavirus: Italians seek 'war damages' from China.
Yeah it’s ruining the uk at the moment... our biggest worry tbh.......It'd probably look something like this to the people who want forced wealth redistribution:
Reminds me of the news that Lady Gaga’s father is asking for $50k in donations to keep their restaurant employees paid for the next month, even though she’s part-owner and could easily cut that check.
I agree with you, but I still believe that the US as a whole would not have tolerated a 3 month shut down announced at the beginning of March. It would have required police and/or military force to enforce (we may still get to that point), and I think it would have caused the US to devolve into a state of civil unrest, possibly even open conflict.
Governments announced a 2 week shutdown, and people have had a hard enough time accepting that. 3 months out of the gate would have sent people over be edge.
Again, I don’t disagree that it’s a failure of leadership (but I’d argue no more a failure than what’s happening in Canada). But I do feel they were stuck between a rock and a hard place.You have a very small opinion of people. And I think you underestimate how much damage this causes, and just how much of a failure of leadership it is.
Really,do you think Westerners are stupid ? Yeah they had protests in "Ontario" that shut down the whole country. It was a Western problem? Alberta spent almost 4 billion on oil sands. How's that working out. How many jobs did that 4 billion make? Zero. Notta, Zilch. I can't stand the jackass Trudumb either but to think Westerners wouldn't comply. Make some common sense man.Again, I don’t disagree that it’s a failure of leadership (but I’d argue no more a failure than what’s happening in Canada). But I do feel they were stuck between a rock and a hard place.
I also don’t think it’s that I have a small opinion of people, it’s just that I think large potions of the American population don’t like listening to their government....especially when it comes to listening to orders given by Trump.
I’m trying to imagine Trump issuing a somewhat preemptive/preventative nation wide lockdown, say March 1 through May 31 (hot on the heals of his impeachment). What do you think the reaction of the likes of Rachel Maddow, Brian Stelter, AOC, Rashida “impeach the mother-🤬” Talib, etc would be? Do you think they would have had nothing to say? Do you think they would support Trump? Keep in mind that many democrats (eg de Blasio) were down playing this virus well into March.
Even if Trump had acted like a leader, I don’t think those who oppose him would have afforded him the opportunity to lead. If that makes me cynical, so be it.
I can tell you from the vibes I get in western Canada, if Trudeau had tried to issue a multi-month, nation wide lock down, enforceable by law (hot on the heals of failing to enforce the rule of law regarding pipeline protests), I think there would be many in western Canada who would not comply, simply because of who issued the order.