- 862
- Cincinnati, Ohi
- DA6righthand
freshseth83I might get on later, not sure when exactly.
I'll be off n on all evening
freshseth83I might get on later, not sure when exactly.
RodeRuner1967Thanks for having the practice room open.
Remember that I'm driving the 06 Nissan Z.
Don't worry, I remember this.
I'm trying to remember when/where I went off track to catch air...can't for some reason.
Well, at least Madrid doesn't have any spots for me to drive off course. It's going to be a tight-packed race this weekend.
I really like the last four tracks of the season pretty much my fav's.
Madrid is a track that never gets played but, is really fun to drive IMO. It's ultra tight and mistakes are not as costly as they are at other tracks because the walls tend to keep you moving. The corners are all pretty straight forward mid to late apexes for most cars. With the exception of the long arcing corners (which favor ultra late apexes) and chicanes (which depend on the car and its setup) the track drives pretty much as it seems.
From what I remember the standard NSX's rule this track but, I don't think the premiums will be as good here. This track should play to the strengths of the GTR and Lexus with a fair advantage over the NSX's.
That's how it looks 'on paper', but Nurb was supposed to be better for the Nissan and Lexus and we saw how that turned out.
I'm getting 1:19s currently, but there are two straights here that hp is needed for. The Supra and NSX will be fast here as well, so lets be realistic. They're the favorite at any track. Next season I might try a more powerful car if we keep the current track schedule.
You're joking, right? The GTRs are 1130kg for starters and just because the lap times are slightly faster doesn't mean they're better during the race. The balancing of these cars are ok, but off IMO. Why? Engine tuning. The Supra is allowed engine tuning and 1090kg. That's double trouble for acceleration and top speed. Under braking it's good too because the low weight. It's not just the Supra though. Other cars get engine tuning as well, and high hp. Any track with long straights they are going to fly. I got ate up on the straight and acceleration @Nurb, even though I had pole. You can't escape the draft with you guys having 15 more hp than me! It doesn't matter much to me, I know there's no way I could keep pace on most these tracks for long. Just hope next season there are more twisty tracks to equal the chances out for all the cars.
Interesting, I was quicker in my GTR's and Lexus' at Nurb GP (first flying laps were 52's where as the NSX had to be light on fuel to get there).
Either way I'm expecting the pace to be quite fast for Madrid. In a 502 hp GTR at 1100 kg, I get mid-high 17's IIRC. I think I'm in the high 16's with the standard NSX's (Takada and Raybrig) so I'll assume the premiums will be somewhere in the low 18's.
I chose the NSX because I felt the GTR's would be too big of an advantage. Equally so, I didn't want to really hamper myself though so I stayed away from the Lexus, even though it turned out to be a great car. I think the Supra is the car of choice under these specs, but I completely missed that previously. The Z seems to have been neutered-down in one of the pre-Spec 2 releases. I remember that car being dominent in the past but its not the case anymore.
BTW, does anyone know if there are PURE specs for the Castrol Supra?
WardezThis is why JGTS uses rolling starts, exactly why.
But the spec's are never going to be exactly right, it's impossible, there's give and take, you work with the cars by setting the right track schedule, which balance out results over a season. DA's done a great job with this.
Yeah, I forgot to shoot you guys the new compact spec. sheet, enjoy:
And a link to its published Gdoc: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0ApxiLS-TgIrqdHNLeklWNFFJeFJlbmZTWi14WFNqREE&output=html