For anyone who posts about garage 56, you are automatically right.
For the past couple of years, garage number 56 had been labeled either "test" or "non GT". The director of the GT Acedmy has been manager of this project for quite the time (sorry I can't post detailed info.. I'm on a mobile) and in my opinion been doing a good job until he asked Nissan to help sponsor. Basically Nissan took all credit just because of the white on black, and the fact they powered it.
Well now the deltawing is sponsored by donations from garage 56 and still operates as that name. This year was the last year for the delta wing, as garage 56 will be introducing the zeod as presented at Le mans this year.
In my thinking,I was pretty sure we'd get the delta wing but the Nissan version only.
There is still the possibility we can get the closed cockpit delta wing that ran in alms. Nissan however has gotten themselves into quite the web, and somehow should get the full blame, as they sponsor(ed) both of these prototypes.
So what I don't understand, is who is suing who over the patent infringement? Nissan sponsor(ed) both cars, so why are they suing their left and right arms?
And this whole Don Panoz stuff, why isn't he sued by Audi when he used the r8 in 2001 (I think) as the spirit of America? What's the difference?
In my mind, along with any other economists mind, this is purely to take the car(or any other product) out of the game, only to reintroduce it with a royalty or a pension I guess you could call it to Mr Panoz.
And another note, why isn't TopGear being sued, as they made almost a full replica of the car??
This is a ridiculous case that should be labeled as child play and greed. I'm probably never going to show sympathy ever to another Panoz project or show interest into another garage 56 project.