- 1,240
- Jounieh
- Georgeagea
Have you had a look at the free GT Sport demo? It shows how just poor the graphics are in PC2.
PC2 by comparison are grainy, seemingly lacking AA, very low fps and gets frequent slowdowns especially when you get the telemetry up you can visually see the drop in fps. They're glitchy, flickery, pixelated - pixelated close-up bonnets of your own car look like something out of the 90's. The particle effects for water/dust are of terrible low quality. Some of the cars even have borders around them like they are cut-outs by a 5yo. Really poor effort all round.
GT Sport is in a different league. The graphics seem really high res, very well shaded. There's no pixelation, no slowdown at all. Looks like 60fps at all times. Motion blur on everything in motion. Sun glinting really brightly off the shiny parts. The dust actually looks like dust - really fine detail.
Take a look at the tarmac on PC2 for e.g. it looks grainy and pixelated at all times. On GTS is looks smooth and well, like tarmac at speed, until you slow down, then you can see more of the surface detail. As you'd expect.
Don't forget about the drawing distance! It's horrendous! Watch replays and see a cube turns into a car gradually!
I have never been a graphics jerk! I always preferred gameplay over graphics! And for that reason, I still like PC2
But it's the first time I was shocked by graphics! Maybe due to the massive hype pre-release! Really disappointed!
@Sick Cylinder could it be that you are a bit confusing graphics with visuals or effects?!
Weather effects overall or visuals (like sunsets or sunrises) look awesome! Really poetic! But did you look on the AA, the pixelation, the rendering errors, the disgusting drawing distance, the flickering, etc...?