- 1,997
- United Kingdom
Can someone confirm for me how cannabis smoking is handled in Canada?
I've heard that they're pretty relaxed about it.
I've heard that they're pretty relaxed about it.
I'd like to say that it is your opinion that you never will take recreational drugs, not that you will never take drugs, fact.Drugs are bad. mmmkay?
I’d like to preface this thread by saying that I never have and never will take drugs for recreational reasons. I take medicine when I need it, pain killers after surgery - that kind of thing. But the drugs I’m talking about here are recreational.
I’m interested in hearing why (not whether) you guys think drugs should be made legal or stay illegal (or both and at what capacity).
Drugs are bad
There is currently a bill up in California to allow industrial hemp farming. I do not know how this is affected.
They might be now.Drugs are bad
I was not expecting those responses, honestly. I was just posting an uneducated generalization that all drugs are bad and used improperly for the sake of posting it.
Drugs are bad. mmmkay?
Id like to preface this thread by saying that I never have and never will take drugs for recreational reasons. I take medicine when I need it, pain killers after surgery - that kind of thing. But the drugs Im talking about here are recreational.
Im interested in hearing why (not whether) you guys think drugs should be made legal or stay illegal (or both and at what capacity).
is that last bit the definition of troll?
Then again, here is the very first post of the thread, seems it's received over 800 responses 👍
There is no reason industrial hemp should be illegal. It was only made so because of the government's tendency to overreach when banning marijuana. They took practically the entire cannabis family with them.There is currently a bill up in California to allow industrial hemp farming. I do not know how this is affected.
Fortunately, hops were left alone.
Yeah, I want to be riding on the same road that someone on ALCOHOL? is driving on. That way if he kills me he will double his prison sentence and my family will have the satisfaction that he is in jail for a long time. (good trade off huh?)Yeah..I want to be riding on the same road that someone on Acid is driving on. That way if he kills me he will double his prison sentence and my family will have the satisfaction that he is in jail for a long time. (good trade off huh?)
Keep them illegal. That's all we need is more legal mind altering drugs for people to be driving on the roads with.
👍
Sad day when the tobacco-driven imperialist Federal Government rules against a class of products that could usurp their nicotine-powered Hegemony.
-
Yay Nicotine!
DennischIf never met anyone who was to stoned to drive. And before you ask, I live in the Netherlands.
Why is it significant that you live in the Netherlands? I'm not saying it isn't, as I'm sure it is, I'm just asking why it is.
I have really bad asthma. Everytime I'm near a smoker, I can't breath. Thats why I personally think that they should make a designated smokers room.
If never met anyone who was to stoned to drive. And before you ask, I live in the Netherlands.
Why is it significant that you live in the Netherlands? I'm not saying it isn't, as I'm sure it is, I'm just asking why it is.
Marijuana is legal for sale here.
DennischMarijuana is legal for sale here.
Marijuana was only illegalized in the USA to improve the paper industry and cripple any chance for a hemp industry.
Bones BrigadeThere isn't any real reason marijuana is illegal other than select corporations lobbying to keep another competitor away. Pfizer, Anheuser Busch, etc.
Oh... I always think the Netherlands is Norway for some reason. Ok, now I understand what you mean. So being extremely stoned doesn't impact your driving enough to cause accidents? I guess it's a lot better than alchohol then. Marijuana was only illegalized in the USA to improve the paper industry and cripple any chance for a hemp industry.
Good idea Duke, considering the fact that millions of taxpayer dollars has been wasted trying to continuously stop the flow of drugs coming into the United States your idea seems like it could keep the druggies happy and result in less normal people being killed as a result of people illegally acquiring recreational drugs to get high.In a nutshell, I'll put it this way. Let me stipulate that I'm oversimplifying a bit.
Drugs should be pretty much legalized. They should be sold like cigarettes or liquor, with a clear and simple warning concerning the dangers and health risks, and only to those over 18 or 21 or some age.
BUT.
Any crime committed while testing positive for drug use should come with a mandatory doubling of penalty. So if you kill someone while driving blasted, or you mug someone to support your habit, you're doing double time.
If you can control your actions and your consumption, you're not a criminal.
I can forsee the outcry that this system punishes poor people, because obviously rich people won't have to steal to support a drug habit, but poor people will. Tough. Rich people can eat better food, drive nicer cars, and live in bigger houses, too. That's the reason to be rich.
Drugs and gun violence are not related to everywhere as they are in the US. Here in the UK both are illegal and although we do have an element of gun violence it's usually gang or revenge related rather than drug related.DanoffPhenomenal article on gun control and how it relates to drug violence. I had never thought to completely link the gun violence statistics and the need for drug legalization quite as directly as is done here. In retrospect, how can one talk about legalizing drugs and not talk about gun violence? How can one talk about gun violence and not talk about legalization of drugs?
http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202587764936&Reflections_on_gun_control_by_a_Second_Amendment_advocate&slreturn=20130112104315
That said it was an interesting article to read, my stance on the matter though is that no recreational drugs that don't pass strict tests should be made legal. Some drugs already are legal for personal use here but not distribution but there are cases where these drugs have caused psychotic episodes which have led to them doing something horrific. Why we would want more of this legalised is beyond me but then I suppose it's easier for me to see my point of view and harder to see the opposing view having felt the effects of what someone high having a psychotic episode can do. It's a tricky argument but I'm definitely against legalisation.