Fanatec CSW/CSR Elite Modders Thread *UPDATE February 2014*

  • Thread starter eKretz
  • 3,608 comments
  • 608,364 views
I went through a 1 pound roll in 5 months. :D lol

edit: I will soon be moving to surface mount and an oven though. Except for connectors, etc.
 
Oh, but you have production going on, I'm only doing mostly repairs. Only a few projects from new here and there. I have been doing some hot air work recently, RXX gave me a suggestion to make some nozzles for my Milwaukee heat gun to try it out and it works great, that hot air actually works really nice and easy.

image.jpg:original


milheat.jpg:original
 
Yep, that's a pretty common thing. A lot of people use cheap heat guns for quick and dirty rework stuff. However, that Milwaukee is nice though as it is adjustable, something most don't have.

Anyhow, I didn't mean to seem condescending on the soldering iron tip stuff. MANY people just toss the thing in the holder when done and then wonder why they can't solder well with their $100+ iron... Well, you treated it like crap, what do you expect? :)
 
Yup, I saw a guy on an electronics forum who bitched up a storm about his new soldering iron when he couldn't solder with it and the tip wouldn't tin. Ended up returning the "defective" iron. Well he finally posted a video that showed his attempt and the tip looked like a piece of coal. Never tinned it immediately after it heated up the first time and by the time he tried it was already oxidized to hell.
 
ersaIcon.jpg:original


Sorry, but they ripped you off!! That thing must be from the dark ages with that ancient (Maya? Inca?) unit of measurement!!

Just jibes, but I laugh a little when I see fahrenheit, pounds, and ounces on here. You crazy people.
 
Last edited:
Getting back to drag for the moment…think about it. If a CSW has .45 lb-ft of drag torque…and a maximum FFB torque of about 4 lb-ft, then:

Drag is 11.2% of the maximum output. Holy cow!

And Max FFB over Drag gives us a ratio of 4 lbft / .45 lbft or less than 9:1

I'm @ 1.x % drag with a ratio of around 60 off the top of my head. Massively better.

See why I'm liking solving this issue? You wind up feeling more information, and can react earlier due to this fact. And when you do react, countersteer is faster since there is less holding you back. And during the brief countersteer you continue to feel what you need to know for better correction inputs.

I am assuming that you will ultimately settle on a drag sweet spot once you have tested your mutant machine to death. I suppose it is somewhat dependent on what you wrote about previously in regards to immersion vs lap times, but I would personally look for a point where the effects that hinder the suspension of disbelief are largely covered.

Also: hehe, MissJoan....
 
Yes the T500 is lower than a CSW/Elite. In the chart below, the CSW and T500 friction torques were taken from a review, while mine was measured on my modified CSR-Elite.

Huge difference, eh? Both of the stock wheels have too much drag to fully exploit their other virtues. Or to permit maximal car control. With mods, I wound up at 1/5 the drag of a T500 and 1/7 of a stock CSW/Elite. And no the T500 cannot be modded to as low as what I did, since it already uses lo-drag belts.

LoDrag_zps05779bb2.png

That's awesome, well done!!!! 👍
 

Awesome graph Racer,👍
What might be helpful for the mass, (like me), would be a recap of what gets someone wheel from 0.45 to 0.07 (the name is Bond) with what is most efficient at lowering the drag.
You have a great point when you mention that not only is the wheel better, more responsive, it is also less demanding on the motor, so better reliability as well. All good.
 
Thank you for sharing, I realize that a lot of it is in the thread and that since it came from your mind it looks perfectly clear through your eyes, and it might be clear to most.
I have to admit that I am sometime, although very interested, challenged in following what you are trying to explain.
I will keep on reading, keep up the good work.👍
 
Thank you for sharing, I realize that a lot of it is in the thread and that since it came from your mind it looks perfectly clear through your eyes, and it might be clear to most.
I have to admit that I am sometime, although very interested, challenged in following what you are trying to explain.
I will keep on reading, keep up the good work.👍

I am sure you are not alone, quite sure in fact because I am often in the same boat. It might be helpful to approach it in stages, rather than being daunted by a multitude of happenings. I don't have a CSW yet, or a lot of time on my hands, but am trying to keep up as much as possible for the future. I would gather that the first two things to do would be to adjust the fans, and shift that belt closer to the motor as they are very basic adjustments. Sometimes each change understood and implemented helps the next as well, in both confidence and knowledge garnered.

.... but yes, you are not alone in... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz-TemWooa4
 
Hey alright, one of my ideas helped out! Idea for the next video:

Show your start-up routine with the low-drag so people can compare the high-drag version that they see every time they start their wheels.
 
Hey alright, one of my ideas helped out! Idea for the next video:

Show your start-up routine with the low-drag so people can compare the high-drag version that they see every time they start their wheels.

looking forward to this.👍
 
Just had a thought...

If you guys are increasing the torque of the wheel by whatever means, then you can afford to increase the size of the motor pulleys slightly achieving better belt wrap (and grip) at lower belt tension, therefore reducing drag.
 
Just had a thought...

If you guys are increasing the torque of the wheel by whatever means, then you can afford to increase the size of the motor pulleys slightly achieving better belt wrap (and grip) at lower belt tension, therefore reducing drag.

Yes, how you are thinking is how you mod! You do not have to be locked into the "way it's always been done".
 
Last edited:
Hmm, I just did a quick check on stock drag torque on my wheel. I wonder if there are variances. The graph you posted earlier shows .45 lb./ft. and I am only getting .36 lb./ft. at my heaviest reading Though it's not much difference, maybe 12 vs. 13 oz. at the wheel rim). That is a pretty significant difference, on the order of 25%. I wonder how they checked the CSW in the graph?
 
Back