More than welcome to join as both a tuner and a tester 👍Hi, I would like to know, is it too late for me to join in? If possible I would like to take part in Group 1, as both a tuner and tester if possible.
Is that time done with 90% maximum Power Limiter or over ?, because I doing this test on 90%.
Ya know thinking about it I may over torquing my tires maybe I should reduce my torque level. Going to 90% generally means higher torque so.,.Is that time done with 90% maximum Power Limiter or over ?, because I doing this test on 90%.
Maybe 98% or something in that range, I prefer not to run too much limiter, only use it if I can't find the right parts to make PP exactlyIs that time done with 90% maximum Power Limiter or over ?, because I doing this test on 90%.
Hatchback.damn, I was hoping you'd say no
Saloon or hatchback?
I'd say 100kg either side of 1000kg is the butter zone, too heavy and you'll get catastrophic understeer on entry, too light and you won't be able to generate grip and the car will skate aroundMy earlier 3'33 and recent 3'31.xxx was done with an NB Roadster, probably gonna test some other cars later on now that I'm done with the tunes on this one.
4WD sounds promising but isn't it too heavy for the downhill?
There are some relatively light 4WDs there, but I'm not so sure if they'll have enough power for the flat sections. I think I'll take my chances with an FR, I'm not so good with FF so I don't think I'll be touching those until I learn more.I'd say 100kg either side of 1000kg is the butter zone, too heavy and you'll get catastrophic understeer on entry, too light and you won't be able to generate grip and the car will skate around
I'm having a similar feeling about my current ride, I still need to build a few cars and check how it compares but as long as its within an acceptable range then I might just run it because it makes me laughI just took a front drive family grocery getter and made it into a curb hopping, four wheel drifting monster. This may be my entry, merely for entertainment value.
90's?Hatchback.
I'm having a similar feeling about my current ride, I still need to build a few cars and check how it compares but as long as its within an acceptable range then I might just run it because it makes me laugh
90's?
80's but this car not easy to drive consistently fast as I said earlier. The best I could manage is 3:36.xx with this car. Still searching a good sleeper ...90's?
You're growing a mustache?!Everything on my short list is late 90's, except for one. I am even going to test something that Burt Reynolds would be familiar with.
Tested car #2 and it is soooooooo gooooooood in the corners, but cannot get out of its own way on the straights.
You're growing a mustache?!
I am even going to test something that Burt Reynolds would be familiar with.
Isuzu Piazza?80's but this car not easy to drive consistently fast as I said earlier. The best I could manage is 3:36.xx with this car. Still searching a good sleeper ...
Nope. Answer is Levin. But just found a 4WD that easily whacking fast lap times consistently (+ silly mistakes) although not really familiar with this track for every tester. This time I will purposely tune it for auto trans. user to love it. Target for every testers: Point to point 3:29 - 3:32.Isuzu Piazza?
Its a feature, not a faultI am in the low 3:33 now but there is a problem with the Blackfoot Shear ft Point-To-Point track, the red arrow in the picture below shows a little dip in the track which unsettles the car and it should be fix now, because I am not going to do anymore tests until it get fixed thank you .View attachment 481423