Did some tinkering last night and got down to flat 2:03's
I'll post it up tonight.
ONe thing I've found is that I'm much faster with more camber in this car (3.0\1.0), IF you hit the specific grooves in the track from Murrays corner through to Forest Elbow.
But if you miss by a centimetre, it's straight into the wall and your lap is toast
WIthout the camber, those missed lines are easier to recover from and salvage some form of lap
Analyse reason why it is going straight on camber, suspension stiffness? Suspension geometry? Lock?
My car is on ground to keep dynamic changes on geometry smallest possible on edge of soft and hard suspension, this car needs wings for grip gaining, but little too much wing and it starts pushing, my wings are keeping just small force on springs all-time.. Maybe you have too much wing, on either end or both?
Edit: i.e. My car has load ratio on springs without wings is 42.5%/57.5% and after wings it's 55%/45%, this ratio change allows spool to have slight slippage on slower speeds and make turning easier, when speed rises wings balance car more neutral spring load weight balance. That variation gives decent rotation on spool on slow speeds and even on higher speeds there is still left minor front lead allowing rear to slip needed amounts.
Edit2: don't think at car is actually ever on 42.5%/57.5 balance(or it's, when parked), wing are doing their job and balance goes pretty linear towards that 55/45% when speed is rising, this dynamic weight balance is "timed" to have nice weight balance on slow and mid speed turns, and even on high speed it's not making it straight going rocket. And this is not direct weight balance, this is spring load balance, or stiffness balance, this would be much easier to write in my own language
percentages are showing amounts of static weight load differences, i.e. If front and rear springs have just exact tension to carry that end static load, not stiffer or softer then load balance would be 50:50, If front is having 5% stiffer than needed springs and rear 5% softer than needed for carrying static load balance would be 55%/45%. Maybe this helps to understand above. This car is running above 4Hz springs, probably somewhere 4.5 to 5.5Hz, depending tuner, that makes static load carrying springs 3-4.5 stiffer than just carrying load. Balance difference is the thing.
About timing, if I want more grip on mid speed corner, I need more wing on both ends (on my setup means adding equal amount on both wings), but also I have to rise spring tension carry that added amount of weight, then comes testing is it linear 10 more wing equal 1% more spring? Or what's ratio between them, probably just needs bit testing, after you read this you will understand at my setup is pretty easy to do better grip, but when added grip on mid speed makes springs too stiff for low speed cornering, again finding balance...
Above has small brainer regarding my load balance.. Should look on notes before writing.. Lol will fix later...fixed..
I.e. 234.. My car with added 15 wings, 388/555 and springs 17.52/15.84 will have more grip, without losing characteristics of handling.
. I sure hope there will be massive improvements from the settings generated from all of the hard work being done by the impressive line-up of tuners. 👍
My setup is extreme, not sure what testers will get out of it, hope not frustration 
Still thinking about my camber/toe 
