- 9,401
- Western Sydney
- mustafur
I'm on the floor at this point lol.Got 15 Likes too.
I'm on the floor at this point lol.Got 15 Likes too.
Make that 16.Got 15 Likes too.
Spent the day? He said it in one interview, on Thursday I believe. It was the press that kept bringing it up.Sorry could you show me where I said they couldn't?
Of course any driver could crash. Point is proven race winners and WDC means they in right car could be winning etc etc. He also wasn't moaning, just stating they weren't for him.
Fact is any other driver had of spent the day moaning about track walks and sims and had put it into the wall the internet would be taking the rip.. with Lewis..nothing.
Maybe. But Famine's post was both criticism and well-timed wit.I think he means criticism, not well-timed wit.
Predicting todays top ten finishers:
1. Nico Rosberg
2. Sebastian Vettel
3. Valtteri Bottas
4. Sergio Perez
5. Kimi Raikkonen
6. Daniel Ricciardo
7. Romain Grosjean
8. Fernando Alonso
9. Felipe Massa
10. Rio Haryanto
Not quite; the technical delegate has allowed him to replace the front left from Q2 with a front left from another set.
What the hell, stewards?
Because it was a mistake. It wasn't the team ignoring what they were told.What the hell, stewards?
A few years ago, Red Bull deliberately ran camber settings outside Pirelli's advice at Spa. It caused blistering on the inside of the tyre, and the team were concerned about failures during the race. They applied to the FIA for permission to use a replacement set, but the FIA said no because Red Bull had ignored Pirelli's advice, and the problem was essentially of their own making; if they were worried about losing positions at the start of the race with an unplanned stop, they were just going to have to grin and bear it. The whole incident - along with the exploding tyres at Silverstone a few years later - was key in setting up the rule that Pirelli's recommendations are mandatory.
But now, Hamilton makes a mistake, damages his tyres, and he gets permission to change? What on earth are the FIA playing at? It was a driver error, pure and simple, and other drivers had bigger lock-ups. So why does he get permission to change?
I'm pretty sure that the rules state that you can only change tyres if there is a critical fault in them - something that makes a failure not only plausible, but likely. The cars came out of FP1 with the tyres cut up from the kerbs without a problem, so a flat-spot shouldn't be an issue.Because it was a mistake.
How many drivers have flat-spotted their tyres this weekend? And how many of them went on to have a catastrophic tyre failure at the end of the straight?Plus the huge straight. With a flatspot it would just be Kimi at the Nurburgring in 2005 again.
Kimi had suspension failure not tyre failure. It would still send someone in the wall at high speed.I'm pretty sure that the rules state that you can only change tyres if there is a critical fault in them - something that makes a failure not only plausible, but likely. The cars came out of FP1 with the tyres cut up from the kerbs without a problem, so a flat-spot shouldn't be an issue.
How many drivers have flat-spotted their tyres this weekend? And how many of them went on to have a catastrophic tyre failure at the end of the straight?
I'm pretty sure that the rules state that you can only change tyres if there is a critical fault in them - something that makes a failure not only plausible, but likely. The cars came out of FP1 with the tyres cut up from the kerbs without a problem, so a flat-spot shouldn't be an issue.
SR 24-4gAt the start of the race each car which qualified for Q3 must be fitted with the tyres with which the driver set his fastest time during Q2. This will only be necessary for these cars if dry-weather tyres were used to set the fastest time in Q2 and if dry-weather tyres are used at the start of the race. Any such tyres damaged during Q2 will be inspected by the FIA technical delegate who will decide, at his absolute discretion, whether any may be replaced and, if so, which tyres they should be replaced with.
A penalty under Article 38.3(d) will be imposed on any driver whose car is not fitted with the tyres with which he set his fastest time in Q2 (except if damaged tyres have been replaced with the approval of the FIA technical delegate).
How many drivers have flat-spotted their tyres this weekend?
Then that makes your point invalid, because Hamilton is replacing a tyre, not a suspension upright. He's been given permission to replace the left front, which he locked up going into Turn 7 during Q2.Kimi had suspension failure not tyre failure. It would still send someone in the wall at high speed.
Almost all of them. We saw frequent lock-ups in free practice, and drivers continued on regardless. They couldn't rightly pit because of one misshapen tyre, because it would mean writing an entire set off.Besides how many drivers have continued to do many laps with flatspots?
I'm aware of that, but the technical director can exercise his discretion, and Hamilton's lock-up wasn't that bad. I'm just struggling to see why a simple lock-up merits the replacement of a tyre.The process isn't instigated by the TD.
What the hell, stewards?
A few years ago, Red Bull deliberately ran camber settings outside Pirelli's advice at Spa. It caused blistering on the inside of the tyre, and the team were concerned about failures during the race. They applied to the FIA for permission to use a replacement set, but the FIA said no because Red Bull had ignored Pirelli's advice, and the problem was essentially of their own making; if they were worried about losing positions at the start of the race with an unplanned stop, they were just going to have to grin and bear it. The whole incident - along with the exploding tyres at Silverstone a few years later - was key in setting up the rule that Pirelli's recommendations are mandatory.
But now, Hamilton makes a mistake, damages his tyres, and he gets permission to change? What on earth are the FIA playing at? It was a driver error, pure and simple, and other drivers had bigger lock-ups. So why does he get permission to change?
Do you even remember the European GP in 2005? Kimi had a flat spot that caused extreme vibrations. Vibrations that ripped apart the suspension with one lap to go. It was one of the main events (The other being the US GP farce) that caused the FIA to abandon the 1 tyre rule in 2006.Then that makes your point invalid, because Hamilton is replacing a tyre, not a suspension upright. He's been given permission to replace the left front, which he locked up going into Turn 7 during Q2.
Yep, just a poor AutoSport article. This is why I also linked to the Sky article which mentions this.Not quite; the technical delegate has allowed him to replace the front left from Q2 with a front left from another set.
In the past, the FIA has sent a pretty clear message: no changes unless it's down to something beyond your control. Case in point, Red Bull at Spa. But now, it's apparently okay.Yes, guess what he made a mistake, not his team trying to bend rules or anything, he simply made a mistake and pretty much everyone else would have been allowed to change their tire in these circumstances, I'm pretty sure it happened a few times in last couple of years, it's a totally normal procedure and is indeed about safety and I'm also pretty sure Pirelli and the stewards know what they're doing cases like this.
Alright who else here just after from Le Mans thread?Good timing 24 hour Le man finishes just before the f1