- 3,600
- Middelburg
LeClerc 3 place grid penalty next race for causing the accident this race.
Fair.LeClerc 3 place grid penalty next race for causing the accident this race.
That would be absolutely heartbreaking, but would just further show how poorly Mercedes managed this race.According to David Croft on Sky, Russell could be disqualified for using 14 sets of tyres in a weekend, because the front tyres fitted in the botched pitstop were from one of Bottas' sets, and no driver is allowed to use more that 13 in a weekend.
Apart from the fact that they always mention just how unlucky Bottas has been this season. None so blind as those who don't want to see
He's driving a car that he's not got a lot of experience with, against a race-winning team mate that does have experience with that car, and is clearly better.They mention it sure, but nowhere near as much as how sorry they sounded for GR today. Leading me to believe they are very meh towards it. For what its worth my eyes are quite good still
Also, am i missing something with all the love for George? He's stepped into the best race car possibly ever made and put it on the front row then led the race. I'd expect 99% of the drivers on the grid to be able to do that. It's not like he is a rookie or never driven a Merc before.
Also regarding
Can someone explain it please?
The guy doesn't physically fit into the car, yet in a car he's never driven manages to set the fastest lap ever recording in the sport in his first 90 minutes driving it, beating a guy who's been driving it for four years. Then he does it again. Then manages to be only 0.025s slower than him. Then destroys him, and everyone else, in the race, only to get stuffed by a bizarre logistical error... and then destroys everyone again. And is finally done in by freak bad luck.Also, am i missing something with all the love for George? He's stepped into the best race car possibly ever made and put it on the front row then led the race. I'd expect 99% of the drivers on the grid to be able to do that. It's not like he is a rookie or never driven a Merc before.
Can someone explain it please?
I noticed that when he was interviewed by DC. He sounded like he should have got the win and not Checo.Stroll giving serious "Dude, I almost had you"-vibes in the post race interview.
Yikes.Although obviously no-one should hope for anyone to become unwell or to continue to be unwell, but if Hamilton fancies having a little cough in the next couple of days I wouldn't be unhappy.
In what way?Yikes.
Absolutely tasteless take.
How is that not wishing harm on a driver? Its a really roundabout way of saying it, but that just comes across as "boy I sure hope Lewis still has covid next week!"In what way?
At no point did I wish harm on anyone.How is that not wishing harm on a driver?
Something I didn't say and very clearly pointed out earlier in the sentence how obvious it was that I wasn't saying it - even though I thought it would be so obvious that I didn't need to point out how obvious it would be, but pointed it out anyway because I figured there's always someone who can't see the obvious...Its a really roundabout way of saying it, but that just comes across as "boy I sure hope Lewis still has covid next week!"
Given that I didn't say what you think I said, and pointed out that I wasn't saying it before I didn't say it, perhaps have another crack at it and come back.Really poor taste.
Just because you say you say "nobody should hope for anyone to continue to be unwell" before saying you wouldnt mind someone continue being unwell in no way means you did not just wish for him to continue being unwell.At no point did I wish harm on anyone.
Something I didn't say and very clearly pointed out earlier in the sentence how obvious it was that I wasn't saying it - even though I thought it would be so obvious that I didn't need to point out how obvious it would be, but pointed it out anyway because I figured there's always someone who can't see the obvious...
Given that I didn't say what you think I said, and pointed out that I wasn't saying it before I didn't say it, perhaps have another crack at it and come back.
The guy doesn't physically fit into the car, yet in a car he's never driven manages to set the fastest lap ever recording in the sport in his first 90 minutes driving it, beating a guy who's been driving it for four years. Then he does it again. Then manages to be only 0.025s slower than him. Then destroys him, and everyone else, in the race, only to get stuffed by a bizarre logistical error... and then destroys everyone again. And is finally done in by freak bad luck.
I mean, you could make the point that the Mercedes is the fastest car out there and should be fighting for wins, but I can't think of many drivers who'd drop into the seat with zero prep and immediately blow Bottas away. Verstappen springs to mind, though how he'd deal with the switch from the high-rake design strategy of the Red Bull to the Mercedes is a question. Leclerc and probably Ricciardo too. Handily, these are also three names often plonked on the "future world champion" pile.
Oh and he won GP3 and F2 at his first attempts.
At no point did I say I wouldn't mind if he continued to be unwell. This should be patently obvious from the fact that I literally just pointed out that nobody would say that and pointed out how obvious that is while saying it.Just because you say you say "nobody should hope for anyone to continue to be unwell" before saying you wouldnt mind someone continue being unwell in no way means you did not just wish for him to continue being unwell.
Oh gosh, look at that. A way of reading it that doesn't require you to pretend I said a thing I didn't say literally right after saying nobody would say it.The only alternative I can think of is if you are suggesting he pretends to be sick
Yes, the reading in which you say I said a thing I didn't say in a sentence right after saying I wouldn't say it, is obviously more correct than the one in which I didn't actually say that thing in a sentence right after saying I wouldn't say it...but that is definitely not how it comes across at all.
Given who it is, not surprised at all. Par for the course, sadly.Yikes.
Absolutely tasteless take.
Why even play the verbal gymnastics at that point? It was horrible wording in my opinion. As long as we are on the same page now then its all good, but I am surely not the only one who took the initial statement in the other direction. But maybe I'm just an idiot.At no point did I say I wouldn't mind if he continued to be unwell. This should be patently obvious from the fact that I literally just pointed out that nobody would say that and pointed out how obvious that is while saying it.
Oh gosh, look at that. A way of reading it that doesn't require you to pretend I said a thing I didn't say literally right after saying nobody would say it.
If it helps this reading in any way, people have been saying Hamilton will quit at the end of this season anyway. Perhaps rather than coming back into the office (by flying to Abu Dhabi) he might chuck a sickie (you know, by calling up Toto Wolff and say "boss, I'm still not feeling great", and having a little cough) so that George can paste Valtteri again.
I wouldn't be unhappy. How tasteless.
Yes, the reading in which you say I said a thing I didn't say in a sentence right after saying I wouldn't say it, is obviously more correct than the one in which I didn't actually say that thing in a sentence right after saying I wouldn't say it...
As I said, I thought the obvious thing was so obvious it didn't need to be said, but said it anyway because there's always someone for whom it isn't obvious.
Why even play the verbal gymnastics at that point? It was horrible wording in my opinion.
Again, if you think it's "tasteless" you're not only reading something that isn't there, you're deliberately not reading something that actually is there as well.Given who it is, not surprised at all. Par for the course, sadly.
There's more tasteful ways of saying it.I think he is only saying that he would like for Russell to participate in the next race as well.
It was harmless. A little cough is not tasteful at all. A little cough means just that, a little cough which actually means that Hamilton is okay.There's more tasteful ways of saying it.
You keep pulling up that you said "nobody should wish this" as excusing you from saying effectively the same thing given that context.Again, if you think it's "tasteless" you're not only reading something that isn't there, you're deliberately not reading something that actually is there as well.
Why does "who it is" have anything to do with anything, apart from being the guy who is out of contract at the end of this year, might be retiring (I think it's unlikely this year; but maybe next), and who could leave an empty seat for Russell to win next week if he can't be bothered jetting to Abu Dhabi and chucks a sickie?
How is that not wishing harm on a driver? Its a really roundabout way of saying it, but that just comes across as "boy I sure hope Lewis still has covid next week!"