- 3,894
- Somewhere
- Roflwaffle16
1:43.2 is my personal best at Matterhorn so far.
EDIT: 42.3 on used tyresdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c2c1/5c2c1fa828f6fba155832154778626a4674b668b" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
EDIT: 42.3 on used tyres
Last edited:
1:43.2 is my personal best at Matterhorn so far.
EDIT: 42.3 on used tyres![]()
Much so.So ummmm....... I feel in a good enough mood to reveal one of the future of GT-O both in this series and as a standalone. Anyone interested?
Shoot.So ummmm....... I feel in a good enough mood to reveal one of the future of GT-O both in this series and as a standalone. Anyone interested?
Shoot.
Much so.
Never realized the flames in GT6 look so good. 👍
Some pictures from Sunday's race…
Early fight with Yera…View attachment 199360
Airborne…
View attachment 199362
Downshifting…
View attachment 199363
Sunrise…
View attachment 199364
Need a carwash…
View attachment 199370
Eww.
Some pictures from Sunday's race…
Sunrise…
41's, I did a few laps earlier and was in the 47's. Looks like Nurburgring was a 1 off
Yeah, the Jag could possibly suffer at Matterhorn's tight turns. As it also needs a certain rev range, it might be not the best fit for this track. Maybe I'll try it tomorrow.
Sweet!However: @rustyMercedes @LancerEvo7 Ferrari 330P4 granted a 10hp boost to 440hp
Give that Lotus a proper racing number, anything but 68... a bad year for racing
I think it's the year.Just picked 68 as that was the car name / year (can't remember now.)
General or your opinion?Give that Lotus a proper racing number, anything but 68... a bad year for racing
I think it's the year.
General or your opinion?
41.0.![]()