The provision of a loving home environment with ample opportunity to develop and lead a productive life is something that MANY, MANY children of heterosexual unions DO NOT GET.
The existence of a mother and a father is FAR from a guarantee of a healthy upbringing and does not preclude the possibility of abuse/abject poverty/crap life.
Heterosexual couples can have sex, birth a child, rinse and repeat. Social workers can become involved if things are bad enough/reported. Or it could work out great and you get a 'normal' development.
Homosexual couples would obviously have to adopt. Adoption services have painfully detailed screening processes. It is not a GUARANTEE, but it is a LOT better a shot at a safe upbringing than the ZERO screening processes necessary for the creation of a baby in the heterosexual instance.
Homosexual couples who pass such screenings would do so because they would have been found capable of providing the healthy and safe environment useful in development.
Homosexual couples who fail such screenings cannot have a child.
Ergo, if we're going for normal development, the adoption route does seem at least as safe.
Ergo, children adopted by homosexual parents are not doomed. I have shown that they have an equal or better chance than do non-adopted children of heterosexual couples of gaining a healthy environment.
The sex of the parents does not determine the environment they can provide. In our world, one's financial state and their internal motivation of wanting to be a good parent are what determines the environment that they can provide.
Stop quibbling about what you'll tell Timmy so he'll fit in with the brats at school and realize that Timmy's already won by having lived in an environment that has allowed him to live long enough to get to school, supported him through the journey so that he'll get something out of it [and thus make arguments based on fact and not what 'feels wrong to me'], and nurtured him so that he will end up having his shoes cleaned by the children who were dumb enough to make fun of him for having two daddies when he was little.
Nobody's retorted anything I've posted in this whole thread (because I'm correct, I assume).
Show me how I'm wrong.
Edit for pre-emptive responces: If anyone's going to rehash the 'raised by homosexual parents will hurt the child's brain' argument I expect them to provide evidence or at least a coherent theoretical backing (preferably based in actual psychological science). Otherwise, STFU because your words are empty guesses.