- 1,335
- WA
- TEAM-SWD-daus26
Yeah he got slammed for it, but it still begs the question, why OTHER than he was not favorable of GT? I mean he wasn't impressed, he gave his reasons why, and they were all legit (except the dying off part, and while dying off is certainly not accurate, he may well have been alluding to stagnation which is more reasonable).
Perhaps, but to me, his reasons are far from legit. Controllers? Wheel Set-ups? Collisions?.. and whatever else he mentioned. Regarding collisions, he judged it as if it was the final build. Other than that, really, there are hundreds of journalists out there who are well alert about GT5's current damage modeling, but in the end, the negativity towards the game was nothing like this guy's. If he really wanted to feel negativity towards something, then he better have better reasonings than that. If he's not bias, then I would certaintly say he's one of the worst journalists ever.
Then he either was unaware of this or I have no idea what he could have meant as he basically said "these wheel setups are neat, but most people will be using controllers, I didn't get to test with controllers because they dont' support it". He obviously can't think GT5 just doesn't support controllers since he says he would be playing it with a controller at home so what else is left?
Yeah, I don't think there is any other fair reasons why he would mention something that specific to one racing game. Again, this is one of the things that I thought was shallow, and I'm guessing this is one of the reasons why it fustrated some. There is absolutely no need to need to mention such things really, even if TGS had no support for controllers.
Here's an editorial from gamespot where it mentions controller setups being there:
http://tgs.gamespot.com/story/6229128/gran-turismo-5-updated-hands-on?tag=topslot;title;1
Last edited: