- 813
- United Kingdom
Gran Turismo 7 Daytona Speedway Gameplay Revealed
- Thread starter Famine
- 466 comments
- 46,518 views
That was not the work of PD, it clearly says so in the quote. It was also not just coded up to work in any version of the game in real time, it was simulated using a lot of hardware and resulted only in speed of a solo car, they didn't work on the racecraft aspect.
You'd hope PD took it on board and looked at the results but it's not something we've been told PD themselves are actively pursuing yet.
EDIT: Tree'd by the author.
You'd hope PD took it on board and looked at the results but it's not something we've been told PD themselves are actively pursuing yet.
EDIT: Tree'd by the author.
Last edited:
- 87,281
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Not really, no - that's not how corporate megastructures work. And even if it did, what is it supposed to do with these training methods for making faster AI? And even if it could do something with them, how does that translate to better AI?
AI that can go faster than you isn't AI that can share a race track with you (or 14 of itself). Training AI to go superhuman speeds doesn't generate racecraft.
And that all diverts from the point that you flagged this up as "They have already created an AI that can beat the best drivers", when in fact "they" haven't. Someone else, flimsily linked through several tiers of a corporate entity, has. It's the latest example of you asserting something untrue with sources that don't support it.
Last edited:
- 491
- 1,940
- Germany
- GlamFM
- GlamFM
This really doesn´t have that much to do with difficulty settings IMO. You can clearly see that the AI does not race. Not with each other and not with you. They build a line, spread out, don´t fight for position with each other and just become roadblocks.
Even the easiest settings in ACC will provide interesting and dynamic races - especially when the aggressiveness is set to 90+
AI is definitely the area where I wanted to see the biggest improvement, but unfortunately it seems largely untouched.
I really hope to be wrong.
Everything else looks stellar! Even the sound seems vastly improved (even though ACC still has the edge here for sure)
- 491
In fact, not only to "games"
ML can be used in various fields.
But if sony's in-house studios need any data to apply ML to their products, I don't think sony is stopping them.
It is a study made on purpose to study the applications of ML that touches many branches of the company including the videogame one.
- 87,281
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Again, no. You really haven't even come close to reading it.
Aside from that, there's no application for filming a screen and feeding that back to an array of devices to train game AI. The project, run out of the separate "Sony AI" company, is actually aimed at training vehicle AI.
But you go off.
- 1,605
- Greece
- Giorgos_Ferrari
Not at all, PD set a new standard with GTS (albeit low) with mixed results if im honest. All i did was google the name of the car to show the difference thats something everyone can do.
Doubtful considering they didn't bother to fix the 'amazing' sound of the RSR since the GT Sport beta. And the didn't bother to record cars like the 2008 GT500s .
I bet it was amazing.
True.
I don't know but im worried.
That could be because of the wind effect.
.
Silver Arrows
(Banned)
- 4,715
- Brandon, MB
- Silver-Arrows21
Amazing how some teams manage to make competitive AI, either through one man or a small team, and literally the best example people have for GT is 'b-b-but machine learning.'
If you seriously think that machine learning will bring better AI then what these smaller teams have been doing by their own hands, then you're an absolute mark.
If you seriously think that machine learning will bring better AI then what these smaller teams have been doing by their own hands, then you're an absolute mark.
- 328
- Australia
- Shakengandulf
- 87,281
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
It means "keep on banging on about it", generally used as ironic speech.
Basically this:
- 813
- United Kingdom
Calm down, it was just simple discussion. I never claimed to be an expert on AI, I just thought it would be a cool idea.
Your tone is so unnecessarily hostile sometimes. I get that some people on here get on your nerves, but is it always needed? Feels like I'm reading through a YouTube comment section sometimes, minus the swearing.
Last edited:
- 328
- Australia
- Shakengandulf
Well, it's more the issue that we've no evidence PD are even using machine learning themselves, never mind how effective it would be if they did.
- 3,199
- Connecticut.
- mwoodski
- mwoodski
- 963
- United Kingdom
Scaff
Moderator
- 29,601
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
All lightweights!
Thruxton is an airfield!
The circuit infield is the aerodrome.
Last edited:
- 4,167
- Ottawa
Since a lot of comments are expressing interest in this title, I would like to share the enthusiasm.
To those who will purchase this title, what are you expecting this title will bring you that you do not have already in GT6 or GT sport?
To those who will purchase this title, what are you expecting this title will bring you that you do not have already in GT6 or GT sport?
- 105
- United Kingdom
- Jack-17AB
About 90 cars and a music rally.
Last edited:
- 17,223
- United Kingdom
- 1,925
- United States
I never bought GT 6 because it was for an obsolete console and Sport was obviously focused on online racing which doesn't interest me. So I expect it will bring a modern take on the series with instant loading, top tier graphics and oodles of customization. Add to that a similar amount of post release content as Sport to keep things fresh and I'll be a happy player. I'm not looking for them to reinvent the series I will be happy with a series of improvements across the board.
Last edited:
Similar threads
