- 1,278
- England
- NS_Zokeo_9
If they flattened the jump at Eiger Nordwand, they'd probably do the same to the jump at Cape Ring, if it came back
PD could make Cape Ring into "circuit version" of japanese togue montain roads....Cape Ring I think has a lot more potential.
My lucky shot will be a Motegi in around NovemberReally hope the next track will be a real race track. We got 3 made up courses in a row now now. One of them being a snow track….
I’m good.
Yeah, licensing and all. Look at what happened to the Top Gear Test Track.But after PD did break "american tracks" cycle. I could expect everything now. I wonder is Silverstone a possibility since it was made for GT6... would PD scrap that track after one entry?
Yes it is one possibility. Especially that GRID 2019 going to GRID Legends also lost Silverstone. Something happened. But on the other hand newest Forza has it. Maybe PD could relicense it some day.Yeah, licensing and all. Look at what happened to the Top Gear Test Track.
If they give us Motegi hopefully they’ll give us ALL the layouts 🙄My lucky shot will be a Motegi in around November
And Circuit Gilles Villeneuve isn't out of the window only because it wasn't shown on Montreal GTWS event
But after PD did break "american tracks" cycle. I could expect everything now. I wonder is Silverstone a possibility since it was made for GT6... would PD scrap that track after one entry?
No new track until 2025My lucky shot will be a Motegi in around November
And Circuit Gilles Villeneuve isn't out of the window only because it wasn't shown on Montreal GTWS event
But after PD did break "american tracks" cycle. I could expect everything now. I wonder is Silverstone a possibility since it was made for GT6... would PD scrap that track after one entry?
What if?What if Gilles Villeneuve was just the internal name PD gave Eiger in the files as they worked on it for its release at the Montreal event
Correct, it was found in 2 different places.What if?
I think that's a stretch given there were image files found too, weren't there?
In 2022 we did get 2 tracks. Watkins Glen amd Road AtlantaNo new track until 2025
What if Gilles Villeneuve was just the internal name PD gave Eiger in the files as they worked on it for its release at the Montreal event
Maybe in that case they'd call it "track_montreal_gtws" or something like that? Think maybe Gilles Villeneuve would be too specific to the circuit to not be that, imo.What if Gilles Villeneuve was just the internal name PD gave Eiger in the files as they worked on it for its release at the Montreal event
There was a generic test_snow_oval that likely became Lake Louise.I always thought Gilles Villeneuve might have been Lake Luise since they are both in Canada.
EDIT: or not.
Image files? If you mean scapes then I don’t think they’re related, scapes and tracks are completely differentWhat if?
I think that's a stretch given there were image files found too, weren't there?
I believe Eiger was in one of the old datamines, yes.Does anyone recall if that had Eiger in it as well?
Maybe one they will make or something. He sometimes change his mindI believe Eiger was in one of the old datamines, yes.
Along with Tokyo R246, but that might have been scrapped 'cause of Kaz saying city tracks taking too long to make.
See you in 2025, when PD doesn't adds a new track in 2024In 2022 we did get 2 tracks. Watkins Glen amd Road Atlanta
In 2023 we did get 2 tracks. Grand Valley and Lake Louise
Why would 2024 be so special? Some people thought we won’t get any new track at all and here we are
Matterhorn was the track that made GT6 stand out for me. Now that there’s precedent for Swiss tracks with mountainous backdrops making a comeback on current gen, I would be over the moon to see it returnNearly screamed when I saw the new RUF thinking it was an 992 Turbo S, but a new RUF is always welcome. Never though I'd see the Gallardo and Scuderia in a Gran Turismo game ever again, hopefully we can also get the pre-facelift version with that glorious 5.0 V10 sound
I'm happy to see Eiger again, always had a soft spot for montainous circuits. Here's hoping they can bring back Matterhorn and Cape Ring too.
View attachment 1370895
"Unless some kind of technical innovation happens." Those are his words from that interview.Maybe one they will make or something. He sometimes change his mind
Perhaps high quality generative AI trained on their Tokyo Expressway building assets? With reference images they took from the real Route 246 for textures? And manual adjustments afterwards if needed. Only way I can see accurate city tracks coming with their level of detail. I know they have procedural city building in the works, but unless they can tune it to produce at least decently location-accurate buildings, I don’t think they’d brother since they are high on making the locations accurate. Which I do appreciate but obviously it does increase dev time."Unless some kind of technical innovation happens." Those are his words from that interview.
So unless said tech innovation does indeed happen that'll speed up dev times, we shouldn't expect any.
According with some spanish youtubers that I follow and are closer friends to some GTWS spanish competitors:So how’s the new physics?
AI could help. But seeing that it's so controversial right now (especially in the art/fanart space), it's probably not worth the negative PR. =/Perhaps high quality generative AI trained on their Tokyo Expressway building assets? With reference images they took from the real Route 246 for textures? And manual adjustments afterwards if needed. Only way I can see accurate city tracks coming with their level of detail. I know they have procedural city building in the works, but unless they can tune it to produce at least decently location-accurate buildings, I don’t think they’d brother since they are high on making the locations accurate. Which I do appreciate but obviously it does increase dev time.
That said, just did some research, seems AI tools (public ones at least) aren’t great at complex 3D models. Buildings are at least somewhat among the more “basic” shapes for the most part, so maybe their own AI tailored for cities could do the job. I’m sure they could get some great programmers given their budget, and if it’s not doable yet, maybe in 5 years or so? AI is improving at a crazy rate after all.
If they train it on their own data, the ethical debate should be more kind, no? I totally support the artists who are upset with AI being trained on their works when they didn’t consent, but if they train it on studio assets, since they are owned by PD, that side shouldn’t be an issue.AI could help. But seeing that it's so controversial right now (especially in the art/fanart space), it's probably not worth the negative PR. =/
"Various other issues have been addressed"What about any bug fixes? and other minor things we should be seeing in the update?