Gran Turismo 7: Latest news and discussion thread

  • Thread starter sems4arsenal
  • 43,453 comments
  • 5,017,710 views
tbh that 1000 garage limit isnt that noticable, i've played gtsport since launch and had over 700 logged in days, and i had about 800 cars in the span of 4 years, so its safe to say that the garage limit wont be much of a problem.
 
They were focusing on graphics and graphical performance/stability. Not AI. AI is irelevant to graphics discussions.
Well it's certainly relevant for a tech review.

If I listen carefully the guy says "We'll explore the visuals and presentation of GT7 on PS5, looking closely at its cars, tracks and technical features, in addition to blablabla Ray tracing questions while also testing performance".

Does not seem like they will review IA in a second video. The second video will be the usual PS5 vs PS4 video.

Usually they laugh at dumb NPC in their reviews no?.. I remember them talking about it in Far Cry 6 or Cyberpunk reviews.

I understand this is not exactly the forum to criticize the game this close to launch day, but it seems that Digital Foundy is not adressing on purpose the huge elephant in the room. One sentence could have said it all, but it's not there in a 30minute video.
 
Great to have an AE86 without the digital dash!
Yeah, it looks like the dash from the anime counterpart.
Yeah, same here, from the south of the country! looks like they went to south america because I also saw for the first time scapes from Chile and Bolivia.
Nice! It's just a shame though the scapes in mine looks low quality lol

Found this on FB.
IMG-20220302-WA0015.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hi, any news about the total events overall? After playing GT4 with mind-boggling 150+ events, I want this to at least feels like GT5, with 60 something and endurance. And endurance! Is it here too? Thank you.
 
What people on here need to realise is that just because the majority of this forum and die-hard fans want better AI, doesn't mean the wider audience in it's whoever many millions is going to be too concerned with the AI racing like Lewis-Alain Verstappenmacher.

That wider audience doesn't typically tie difficulty with quality, and will lose interest in a game if they're continually being stomped by bots.

I want better AI too, but at the same time I realise that the better AI might driver the larger audience away.
Well this is complete BS, excuse me. Is it too much asking in 2022 , on systems that cost a fortune and can deliver huge power ? This is mass market , so kids or grandmas can enjoy beginner level if they want but grown-ups needs a challenge.

When I was a kid early 90's some games were incredibly hard, and I finished them after long training, we all finished them by training I'm no exceptional talent. Maybe you're not from the generation who trained hard to finish games. I personally need a challenge to commit to play games , otherwise I lose interest in a matter of hours. The majority of players needs that as well. Would you say the most played games at the moment are easy games ? No, they are so successfull because they are mainly online and people can find people that match their skills.

By the way I'm very casual gamer, between work/kids and so on . But I'm still good at this stuff.
 
Last edited:
Well it's certainly relevant for a tech review.

If I listen carefully the guy says "We'll explore the visuals and presentation of GT7 on PS5, looking closely at its cars, tracks and technical features, in addition to blablabla Ray tracing questions while also testing performance".

Does not seem like they will review IA in a second video. The second video will be the usual PS5 vs PS4 video.

Usually they laugh at dumb NPC in their reviews no?.. I remember them talking about it in Far Cry 6 or Cyberpunk reviews.

I understand this is not exactly the forum to criticize the game this close to launch day, but it seems that Digital Foundy is not adressing on purpose the huge elephant in the room. One sentence could have said it all, but it's not there in a 30minute video.
Ok. Stop saying NPC. Its clear where you sit politically so as such you deserve none of my advice towards actually becoming a decent human being. Or learning from your fallacies.

Wallow in your shame. Ignored. Moving on with my life.
 
Any word on lobby voice chat?
Not for sport mode I completely agree it should not be a thing there.
But for open/private player created lobbies? As that's how I, on GT5, and I'm sure many others here met the friends I/they still race with to this day.
It's also immensely useful for recruiting new drivers for championships/groups etc.
 
Last edited:
snc
apparently big improvements in physics (SuperGT and VVV reviews), great to hear and surprising for me as thought it will be very similar
Yes, very positive review from SuperGT which has got me very excited. I was a bit bummed, however, when he mentioned the snap oversteer in the R8 LMS. It appears the MR car Group 3 cars may still be a handful, unlike their real life counterparts. Other than that, it sounds like we may have some great improvements to the physics, I’m not expecting iRacing or ACC, just something “believable” and GT7 should be a positive step.
 
Last edited:
I'm just waiting for the usual suspects on here to vehemently disagree with the positive reviews, then argue and demand that everyone else agrees with them that the game is terrible, and will be on discount.

...oh wait, they're already here.

Somehow your attitude comes across far more toxic than those who stop by to justify their own unpopular opinion. Don’t like it? Consider not reading it instead of tackling them as if your opinion is superior to theirs. :rolleyes:
 
The tuning and physics improvements have me stoked. I bet we are going to see a lot of whining about tuning around here.
 
Last edited:
Ok. Stop saying NPC. Its clear where you sit politically so as such you deserve none of my advice towards actually becoming a decent human being. Or learning from your fallacies.

Wallow in your shame. Ignored. Moving on with my life.
Somebody translate this for me...
 
Well this is complete BS, excuse me. Is it too much asking in 2022 , on systems that cost a fortune and can deliver huge power ? This is mass market , so kids or grandmas can enjoy beginner level if they want but grown-ups needs a challenge.

When I was a kid early 90's some games were incredibly hard, and I finished them after long training, we all finished them by training I'm no exceptional talent. Maybe you're not from the generation who trained hard to finish games. I personally need a challenge to commit to play games , otherwise I lose interest in a matter of hours. The majority of players needs that as well. Would you say the most played games at the moment are easy games ? No, they are so successfull because they are mainly online and people can find people that match their skills.

By the way I'm very casual gamer, between work/kids and so on . But I'm still good at this stuff.
There's is only one reasonably response to this: LOL
 

Latest Posts

Back