It's not the fact that it's not greater than Pcars2. I think its more about the fact that this is the outcome of 4+ years of development for a game that seems lackluster on paper when you look at Pcars2. I for one preferred GT and Forza over Pcars, greatly. However, this time around, I'm not sure how I feel about GTS just yet.
And the issue is what? We had issues with these features on in the past, and now it still seems like an issue even with the removal of dynamic situations. What does that have to do with Pcars, though? We have no idea if it'll play as nicely as we hope, and even taking the past into consideration, many many people are worried it'll play out the same.
It's not in comparison to Pcars, it's in comparison to itself. There have been updates to it, and they look like they're trying to improve it, but I feel they're a bit sterile still.
People hoped that with the inclusion of the FIA, there would be more "real" content, I suppose. Is that to far-fetched?
I haven't seen this said, at all. I've seen
@Scaff talk about things that actually do sound broken, rather than just saying its simple so its broken.
At this point I'm not going to reply to the rest. It's obvious you're overexaggerating everything that has been said about the game just to try to undermine people's valid complaints about things. You're making it an obviously extreme example and not even being reasonable about it. A lot of these things have very valid reasons to be bothered about by different people.
I'm surprised you don't see the irony in the post you just made. You're introducing a slug fest to everyone by coming around making posts like these. Please do distance yourself, because the last few posts you've made have been following the same trend. That is coming in to threads to complain about people's issues with the game.
My top personal issues are the lack of customization, and offline-campaign mode. Is that unreasonable?