- 2,976
- Sweden
Very good. I think he's spot on.Great article here written by a fellow racer.
http://blackflag.jalopnik.com/what-the-hell-is-going-on-at-the-nurburgring-1695492434
Very good. I think he's spot on.Great article here written by a fellow racer.
http://blackflag.jalopnik.com/what-the-hell-is-going-on-at-the-nurburgring-1695492434
Its a shame about that second fence being a private property line, that basically meant all those poor spectators were sitting ducks. Hopefully the track and property owner can work something out to make that area safer for future races.
*sigh*And a Ferrari takes out a Ginetta.
http://www.speedcafe.com/2015/04/05/carnage-hits-final-day-of-bathurst-motor-festival/
Blancpain sprint series today, anyone know what time?
They are already slower then GT3 though.I think cross ply tires for GTE
It's not clear from the wording whether they mean cut slicks (like F1), or full treaded tyres....Wait as in those tires on F1 cars back in the 2000's?
Yeah because while cut slicks may do nothing...treaded tires might cause more accidents. Maybe GT3 should use the power and weight regs from GTE. Have to be careful though as GT3 has about twice as many manufacturers in it for a reason.It'd slow the cars down, which for pretty much everyone is a key problem with GT3 racing at the minute. The crash itself was a combination of things, mostly aero related, but slowing the car down would've meant a less violent impact with the tyres and possibly the chance of the car not vaulting the fence.
It's not clear from the wording whether they mean cut slicks (like F1), or full treaded tyres.
I don't personally think that's the right move, at all, though. If we want to slow the cars down, focus on actual power output and aerodynamic aids. They're the two key areas that need addressing, for me at least.
Make them nice and simple again:Yeah because while cut slicks may do nothing...treaded tires might cause more accidents. Maybe GT3 should use the power and weight regs from GTE.
Ah one of my favorite GT3 cars...the Ascari. Yeah, maybe its time for a slight dialing back of the aero craze in GT3. GTE aero regs could work well...plus it might attract even more manufacturers.Make them nice and simple again:
[...]possibly the chance of the car not vaulting the fence.
The crash and the result was due to many, many factors, and nobody really knows to what degree they played, but cars hitting the barrier at less deadly speeds is something that can only be good.But then again the fence vault was the result of the angle/how the car hit the barrier.
They are already slower then GT3 though.
Make the tyres from recycled plastic bags, the FIA can market it as an eco series then.Put GT3 cars on tank tracks
Mmmmm.
Super GT this morning, in an interview with Bandoh, it was stated that grooved tyres are being discussed for GT3 and GTE cars in Europe only. This is in response to the Nurburgring crash.
Unfortunately not, it was in the JSports roundtable quite a bit after the race, in Japanese too.Where is this interview? Online anywhere?
No...motorsport...should...EVER...use...those...sorry *** excuses of spoilers for legit reasons ANYMORE.Why can't GT3 just have rear spoilers like NASCAR?
Sometimes, I feel GT4 would be better. The cars are fast enough. Less expensive. Could still have a big field . I enjoy the category as is. It's just, cars keep going faster and faster, get expensive and plugs start getting pulled. GT1, Super Touring, Group B rally, etc.
Then there would be no point in gt3No...motorsport...should...EVER...use...those...sorry *** excuses of spoilers for legit reasons ANYMORE.
At any rate GT3 should just go to GTE aero regs.
True. Should maybe try drawing a line somewhere with how radical the aero can be possibly though. Course I want GT3 to stay like it is now though honestly, cars haven't gotten more expensive since it really took off in 2012 have they?Then there would be no point in gt3