That’s an odd stance to have considering you posted a bunch of pics of highly-detailed headlights when the majority of the game is spent behind them. Seems the logic would apply to those as well.about this
the reason why rims are a little downgraded on track is because them rotate... so you can't see them... full rendering the rims ingame for PD is only a waste of resources
if you want to see rims you have an apposite section of the game
Someone has to degrade GT in order to recover from the shake of the level of details created by PD which defeats Forza 7 in every aspect.Cherry picking master level
on very few cars in GTS the tessellation in photomode looks bugged.... and you take photos just of one of that cars... what a coincidence!
the only part of the cars that ingame looks different from scapemode are rims (probably because ingame rims rotate and are not visible) all the rest of the car is almost the same of scapemode...
some cars has perfect rims also ingame
It better given all the time and priority PD put in that department.
Don't get mad because people know how to enjoy games, and not act like we're married to one.
It's funny because no one is degrading GT. However, if that's your logic with how people degrade things, than that bill fits you exactly as all you do is go around and degrade other games
How foolish for someone to go on like this.
While scapes gives the highest LOD in the game it is only a HD background with some spatial element in it to select the car(s) you want.Im not disappointed...
But taking pictures is what "Scapes" is for.
What are you talking about? Standard car quality??
Any part of the game is for taking photos. You may not be disappointed, but it would only serve you and I better, and everyone else too, if they used a higher LOD during gameplay as well. While I do appreciate the scapes, I also do like doing some live shooting during a race and whatnot.
Not one person called him out for calling out those shots. You should go back and actually read what is happening, because going off what you said, it makes it seem like you haven't been paying attention.
He got called out for being ironic, because he claimed cherry picking, then went on to do exactly that, not just because he said cherry picking. Hence the pointing out of irony.
The point is that you complaining about the discussions going on is ridiculous, as this thread was set up for exactly that. So if you want to see pictures without discussion go do that, as this isn't the place for it. It wasn't a hard concept to grasp.
I also thought the WRX shots where fine, I actually even said that. Him replying cherrypicking is exactly the issue, because Forza not looking as bad, and then continuing to do the thing that he just called someone out for is the issue.
That you oh so hate.
That's just it, you aren't comparing anything. You're complaining about discussions happening within a discussion thread, and labeling it as bickering. News flash, people discuss in threads that are specifically set up for discussion, or "bickering" as ou call it. That you feel the need to complain about discussions happening in a discussion thread is indeed, ridiculous. If you want comparisons, make them, otherwise I have no idea what you're trying to get through here.
I think they're fine if the represent the sole vehicle, not the whole game, like someone is trying to portray. I also think it woul be a fine comparison if it was acknowledged that while GTS is better in aspects of modeling, they also have they're very own issues, the same ones that are only being pointed against Forza by that person.
I'm talking about your posts. You labeled it as bickering, yet its just been discussions about the game and the context of this thread. So what were you talking about, if not what people are talking about? I agree, this does deserve a complaint, so if you such an issue with it, I'm confused as to why you brought it up and continued down that exact path while adding nothing more to the thread than more "bickering".
Slow your roll.
I'm sorry, I got that mixed up with the with the MX-5 comparison. So looking over what you just quoted, no I don't think it was fair. He purposely went to find the worst looking tree he can find, yet failed to do the same with GTS? That is literally the definition of the term. @turk1993 cleared that up right after by showing what the vast majority of the game looks like when playing.
I'm not the one complaining about the discussions though, I'm perfectly content with how it goes through, and I'll reply as I see fit without having to come in to post something absolutely unnecessary that has nothing to do with the context of the thread, nor the discussion going on. You yourself have turned this into what you have complained about.
How is it untrue when you yourself said that adaptive tesselation wasn't working correctly? You literally pointed that it with the WRX. How can you straight out lie so much?Totally untrue combo x2
GT6
GTS
The truth that GTS looks so much better than Forza made some ppl furious and unacceptable lolIn those screens GTS destroys Forza7 in track details and realism and the only thing you are able to notice is the contrast? (whithout considering that GTS have the best HDR sistem on the market that in those SDR photos is not visible)... LOL
It's funny how the T10 and FM players began to fabricate rumors such as GT used 2D paper tree model whereas Forza had 3D threes since GT5, it turns out that this is a big lie and just recently been debunked by Digital Foundry. The result? the furious FM players gets even more mad lolTotally untrue combo x2
GT6
GTS
